<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 10:11 PM
Subject: RE: tomcat_4.0.4 + apache_2.0.39 + mod_jk2 (linux): a failed
attempt
> Of course!
>
> I did read somewhere that you can use mod_jk, but I must admit after so
> many frustrating hours trying to make mod_jk
---
> From: Andrew Conrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 07 July 2002 00:00
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: tomcat_4.0.4 + apache_2.0.39 + mod_jk2 (linux):
> a failed attempt
>
>
> You know that you could use mod_jk with Apache 2
ocumentation regarding this
> kind of setup, can
> anyone offer any useful pointers?
>
> Andrew, thanks again for the tip.
>
> Dan
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andrew Conrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 07 July 2002 00:00
> > To: &
Sent: 07 July 2002 00:00
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: tomcat_4.0.4 + apache_2.0.39 + mod_jk2 (linux):
> a failed attempt
>
>
> You know that you could use mod_jk with Apache 2, correct?
>
> - Andrew
--
To unsubscribe, e-m
You know that you could use mod_jk with Apache 2, correct?
- Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Farinha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 5:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tomcat_4.0.4 + apache_2.0.39 + mod_jk2 (linux): a failed
atte
