Jon Eaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi again Bill,
Aha. I was hoping this wasn't going to be the answer. Oh well.
[ snip ]
If this is the case, why does the code for the Valve recommend
implementing the Lifecycle interface ?
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Jon Eaves wrote:
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 13:17:53 +1100
From: Jon Eaves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Custom Valves and Administration Tool
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
First
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Jon Eaves wrote:
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:38:48 +1100
From: Jon Eaves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Custom Valves and Administration Tool
Hi all,
Thanks to Bill Barker, my custom
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
First of all as there's been so much beating on the Tomcat developers
I'd like to offer my whole-hearted congratulations to each and every
one of you. You've done a great job, and what's more, in spite of
the (unwarranted) vitriol that is spewed in your direction,
Jon Eaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
First of all as there's been so much beating on the Tomcat developers
I'd like to offer my whole-hearted congratulations to each and every
one of you. You've done a great
Hi again Bill,
Aha. I was hoping this wasn't going to be the answer. Oh well.
[ snip ]
If this is the case, why does the code for the Valve recommend
implementing the Lifecycle interface ? What was the design reason for
that ?h
By implementing Lifecycle, you get well-defined states to
