Very interesting. Thanks for making the effort and sharing your results.
--
***
* Rick Roberts*
* Advanced Information Technologies, Inc. *
* http://www.ait-web.com *
***
Nice. I'm bookmarking this post for the future. 'Nuf said. Thanks, Yoav!
John
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
Of course not. I'm only regergitating stuff I have read. But I have
seen
it from several different sources, so I took it as truth. Do you have
benchmarks to prove otherwise?
It
It probably bears repeating the link to Craig's analysis of Apache vs
Tomcat standalone and the procedure for determining what is best FOR
YOUR APPLICATION:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-userm=104874913017036w=2
BTW - as somebody alluded to earlier, this link was found through the
FAQ,
Howdy,
Of course not. I'm only regergitating stuff I have read. But I have
seen
it from several different sources, so I took it as truth. Do you have
benchmarks to prove otherwise?
It could be the sources you read are outdated. I don't question their
accuracy at the time they came out,
-
From: Venkat Reddy Valluri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 7:46 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat and Apache | Performance
There is a option in httpd.conf as well as server.xml(Ajp13Processor max
processors) to set max clients to be served
Hi All,
I am using tomcat 3.3.1 and apache 1.3.27 with mod_jk (ajp12
protocol). We are running it in Solaris 2.8 ( 4 CPU 4GB RAM ). At times
when the system is under heavy load, apache simply stops processessing
requests. And the hits/sec goes down. The system idle state is around
99%. At
Message-
From: Rajesh B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 12/24/2002 8:57 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Cc:
Subject:Tomcat and Apache | Performance
Hi All,
I am using tomcat 3.3.1 and apache 1.3.27 with mod_jk (ajp12
protocol). We are running it in Solaris 2.8 ( 4 CPU 4GB
