> That's also what I referred to when mentioning "SSL Session" - see, the
> SSL layer in effect creates a session with the client, and one can thus
> use this to do sessioning/sticking with - AT LEAST this works when you use
> client certificates, but I'm not totally sure how this goes when there
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 06:26, QM wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 05:33:00AM -0700, Cott Lang wrote:
> : One problem with that is you can still have the session hop servers
> : since the Local Director can't match up cookie based mappings to SSL
> : session mappings, since it can't read the cookies
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, QM wrote:
| On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 05:33:00AM -0700, Cott Lang wrote:
| : One problem with that is you can still have the session hop servers
| : since the Local Director can't match up cookie based mappings to SSL
| : session mappings, since it can't read the cookies from SS
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 05:33:00AM -0700, Cott Lang wrote:
: One problem with that is you can still have the session hop servers
: since the Local Director can't match up cookie based mappings to SSL
: session mappings, since it can't read the cookies from SSL connections,
: and can't read non-exis
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 02:59, Endre StÃlsvik wrote:
> No, I can't seem to imagine! ;) You should let LocalDirector do the
> SLL'ing - and then you can use the "SSL Session" as stickyness too.
One problem with that is you can still have the session hop servers
since the Local Director can't match u
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Mitchell Teixeira wrote:
| Thanks for the responses so far on this topic. Seems like I need to
| elaborate a little
|
| We are looking towards Tomcat clustering to solve a problem caused by
| so-called Megaproxy ISPs such as AOL, etc. These ISPs make it look as if
| the s
(lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 August 2004 17:31
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat clustering without Apache
session replication is supported in tomcat without apache
in tomcat 5, just uncomment the cluster section in server.xml, also, there
are online docs
http
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tomcat clustering without Apache
Thanks for the responses so far on this topic. Seems like I need to
elaborate a little
We are looking towards Tomcat clustering to solve a problem caused by
so-called Megaproxy ISPs
Thanks for the responses so far on this topic. Seems like I need to
elaborate a little
We are looking towards Tomcat clustering to solve a problem caused by
so-called Megaproxy ISPs such as AOL, etc. These ISPs make it look as if
the same client is coming from multiple IP addresses. This bre
You can also use any kind of hardware or software load balancer or DNS round robin.
Ta
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 August 2004 14:12
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat clustering without Apache
Hi,
The Balancer webapp is meant
s for when a server goes down.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Mitchell Teixeira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 9:05 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Tomcat clustering without Apache
>
>Hello - I am stil
Hello - I am still fairly new to Tomcat but I have the need to put up a
Tomcat cluster. Most of the reading I've done about Tomcat clusters shows
using Apache someplace in the environment. Is it possible to cluster two
Tomcat servers without Apache, IIS, etc. in the picture?
Any ideas, links, etc.
12 matches
Mail list logo
