Are there any advantages running Tomcat with Apache
versus running Tomcat standalone and listening on port
80. I am running only *.jsp files on my webserver.
Thanks in advance.
-- Chad Wray
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low
:
Subject: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/
Apache
07/30/2001
05:04 PM
At 02:04 PM 7/30/2001, you wrote:
Are there any advantages running Tomcat with Apache
versus running Tomcat standalone and listening on port
80. I am running only *.jsp files on my webserver.
Added security if you use Apache.
Also there is an increase in performance for static files like .html and
static images.
-srini
- Original Message -
From: Tim O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Apache
At 02:04 PM 7/30/2001
tomcat doesn't support apache mods yet does it?
- Original Message -
From: Chad Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 5:04 PM
Subject: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Apache
Are there any advantages running Tomcat with Apache
versus running Tomcat
O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Apache
At 02:04 PM 7/30/2001, you wrote:
Are there any advantages running Tomcat with Apache
versus running Tomcat standalone and listening on port
80. I am
: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Apache
What? using Apache with Tomcat will increase the performance for static
pages? Well, my admin told me the opposite, she said the browser hesitated
for a fraction of a second and then the static pages got load up when using
Apache + Tomcat. So she wanted to use
there is an increase in performance for static files like .html and
static images.
-srini
- Original Message -
From: Tim O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Apache
At 02:04 PM 7/30/2001, you wrote
- Original Message -
From: Tim O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Apache
At 02:04 PM 7/30/2001, you wrote:
Are there any advantages running Tomcat with
Apache
versus running Tomcat
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Richard Draucker wrote:
The following is a cut'n paste from tomcat/doc/uguide/tomcat_ug.html.
If you have tomcat installed, look for this doc and provide this text to your
sys admin.
Setting Tomcat to Cooperate with the Apache Web Server
Tomcat is not as fast as
Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Richard Draucker wrote:
The following is a cut'n paste from tomcat/doc/uguide/tomcat_ug.html.
If you have tomcat installed, look for this doc and provide this text to your
sys admin.
Setting Tomcat to Cooperate with
Pier,
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Well, to be completely honest, and being the author of 2 out of 3 apache
connectors to Tomcat, I am a _BIG_ fan of using Tomcat in stand-alone mode.
Unless you don't specifically require some of the Apache functionalities,
run it stand
Dmitri Colebatch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier,
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
Well, to be completely honest, and being the author of 2 out of 3 apache
connectors to Tomcat, I am a _BIG_ fan of using Tomcat in stand-alone mode.
Unless you don't specifically require some
At 05:19 PM 7/30/2001, you wrote:
Of course, there are many non-performance-related reasons you might be
required to use Apache in conjunction with Tomcat (if you need the other
functionality that it provides). But, if you don't, you owe it to
yourself to see if Tomcat stand-alone runs fast
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Tim O'Neil wrote:
At 05:19 PM 7/30/2001, you wrote:
Of course, there are many non-performance-related reasons you might be
required to use Apache in conjunction with Tomcat (if you need the other
functionality that it provides). But, if you don't, you owe it to
15 matches
Mail list logo
