Antonio,
In fact, cap it at 10 and watch the app dring to a halt before it even
gets going. This is a pretty compelling example. If the pool is drying
up, they're definately screwing up.
It is. But developers may reply: You are using less connections than
those specified in (the contract) /
of the developers responding his thread and get the issues fixed for
the project.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 9:49 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat
Kannan,
Being yourself as SYSADMIN
On Monday March 01 2004 06:42 pm, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Tried that. Capped it at 35 and the webserver stopped servicing any
DB request as soon as the pool reached 35. This is why I believe the
pool management is faulty and/or something is hogging all the
connections.
I share
PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat
Sysadmins are sysadmins AND developers are developers. No one
cannot cross the borderline or even compare.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Stephen,
In fact, cap it at 10 and watch the app dring to a halt before it even
gets going. This is a pretty compelling example. If the pool is drying
up, they're definately screwing up.
Whoa there pardner: I am not going to deliberately cripple a production box.
The problem has been
Yes, But that doesn't mean that we can put and point on developers for any
problem.
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Einfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 10:59 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat
No that's not true,
My
Kennan,
I can agree partially to yours. But if you see him, he doesn't know about
the impact of JVM and tuning parameters, as he mentioned in his email. Do
you expect him to take a lead in fixing that? I have seen the projects
losing its focus by the nature of peoples deviating to get their
omcast.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
03/02/2004 10:42 AM Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts
Here is some more information on the problem. From a developer:
According to the document that the link below refers to, a single
instance of Tomcat will have multiple JVMs, where each JVM represents a
virtual host. The following link clearly states this virtual host concept
as it applies to
... You are using
4.1.x and they are quoting 3.x docs. They should know better!
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Carville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 9:18 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat
Here is some more
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:18 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat
Here is some more information on the problem. From a developer:
According to the document that the link below refers to, a single
instance of Tomcat will have multiple JVMs, where
Antonio,
And bad. Every time I restart, Tomcat loses the state information for
established login sessions. Customer don't like that.
That (with a high probability) is because some objects they store in
sessions are not Serializable. IOW, they violate the Servlet Specification.
I'm just
Kannan,
Being yourself as SYSADMIN for UNIX and Network, it would be nice that
developers or professional should take a lead into get into this problem.
Easy for you to say.
Let's face it: these guys have a connection leak. Plain and simple. Your
devs need to find their leak. It is
That (with a high probability) is because some objects they store in
sessions are not Serializable. IOW, they violate the Servlet
Specification.
I'm just curious: is this actually a violation of the servlet spec?
The API seems to indicate that you can put anything in the session
that you
I am having a problem with tomcat opening up up a number of connections to an
oracle server that never get closed. This causes the number of open
connections to build up over time and, eventually, causes the oracle server
to use all of its swap. Restarting tomcat clers this up.
I think there
Stephen,
I am having a problem with tomcat opening up up a number of connections to an
oracle server that never get closed. This causes the number of open
connections to build up over time and, eventually, causes the oracle server
to use all of its swap.
That's not good :(
Restarting tomcat
On Sunday February 29 2004 11:58 am, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Stephen,
I am having a problem with tomcat opening up up a number of connections
to an oracle server that never get closed. This causes the number of
open connections to build up over time and, eventually, causes the oracle
Message-
From: Stephen Carville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 5:48 PM
To: Tomcat Users
Subject: Virtual Hosts with Apache and Tomcat
The increase in number of connections beyond the
CACHE_MAX_SIZE setting in
the app1.properties file is due to the private
Stephen Carville wrote:
Restarting tomcat clers this up.
That's good! :)
And bad. Every time I restart, Tomcat loses the state information for
established login sessions. Customer don't like that.
That (with a high probability) is because some objects they store in
sessions are
PM
Subject: Virtual hosts with Apache 2.0.43 Tomcat 4.1.12 mod_jk2 on Linux
I can't seem to figure out why my setup behaves differently when I access
the same host with and without 'www.'. I used to run Apache 1.3.x and
Tomcat
4.0.x, where my setup included aliases in Apache config file
I can't seem to figure out why my setup behaves differently when I access
the same host with and without 'www.'. I used to run Apache 1.3.x and Tomcat
4.0.x, where my setup included aliases in Apache config file as well as two
virtual hosts in Tomcat (with 'www.' and without) for each domain. Not
What is the difference between specifying VirtualHost in apache conf
file vs. Host element in Tomcat server.xml file?
Does this depend on the connector used? Would using Host elements in
server.xml remove dependency on what connector is used?
Thanks,
d.
--
David Mossakowski
Can anyone please provide a working configuration for Apache 2.0.40 virtual
hosts with Tomcat 4.1.10 (running in-process) and mod_jk2?
Defining a virtual host in Apache, redirecting to Tomcat (via
workers.properties), defining a virtual host and context in the server.xml
file isn't working
?
(I don't have any trouble with the same configuration but mod_jk instead of
mod_jk2)
Dom
- Original Message -
From: Short, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 7:30 PM
Subject: Virtual hosts using Apache 2.0.40, Tomcat 4.1.10
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Virtual hosts using Apache 2.0.40, Tomcat 4.1.10 and
mod_jk2
Hi
I'm having the same trouble using Apache 2.0.40, Tomcat
4.1.10 and mod_jk2
with virtual hosts
It works without problem
25 matches
Mail list logo
