David Whitehurst wrote:
Chuck:
Could you elaborate on what those parameters would be? A port is just
a number. I'm trying to understand the history, but I would appreciate
your comments on the other things required to make Tomcat production
ready on top of just changing the Coyote connector
to 443?
Thanks,
David L. Whitehurst
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Parsons Technical Services
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why 8080 and 8443 ..?
So there are two of the possible reasons that an upper port
was chosen.
Also, Tomcat is distributed
On 4/26/05, David Whitehurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you elaborate on what those parameters would be? A port is just a
number. I'm trying to understand the history, but I would appreciate
your comments on the other things required to make Tomcat production
ready on top of just changing
required to make Tomcat production
ready on top of just changing the Coyote connector from 8080 to 80 and
8443 to 443?
Thanks,
David L. Whitehurst
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Parsons Technical Services
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why 8080
From: Michael Mehrle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why 8080 and 8443 ..?
Which are ??? Please feel free to elaborate ;-)
As Jason mentioned, running Tomcat in production requires configuring
the desired connectors and the various internal and external resources,
and also
I'm curious about the historical reasons behind the choice of 8080 and
8443 as the default ports for Coyote connectors? Can someone answer
this question? Knowing that the general ports are 80 and 443, would the
need for translation of the ports, running Tomcat as a non-root user, be
a reason
Whitehurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 6:23 PM
Subject: Why 8080 and 8443 ..?
I'm curious about the historical reasons behind the choice of 8080 and
8443 as the default ports for Coyote connectors? Can someone answer
this question? Knowing
-Original Message-
From: Parsons Technical Services
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why 8080 and 8443 ..?
So there are two of the possible reasons that an upper port
was chosen.
Also, Tomcat is distributed in a more-or-less development configuration,
rather than
Which are ??? Please feel free to elaborate ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 8:00 PM
Subject: RE: Why 8080 and 8443 ..?
-Original Message-
From: Parsons
