a 'one-click' j_securty_check question

2002-09-05 Thread jfc
Hi, I would like to structure my application so that the user can choose to login instead of being enexpectedly prompted to be logged in. It seems declarative form-based security comes with the philosophy that your URL has to explicilty request a resource which is secured under the role you

Re: a 'one-click' j_securty_check question

2002-09-05 Thread David Cassidy
i think that unless Im completly missing your point your missing the Realm's point. (Or I am) When you log in using the realm it takes from the database all your associated roles. ie if you have admin, editor and journo roles but you only need 'editor' role for the area you want to go into TC

Re: a 'one-click' j_securty_check question

2002-09-05 Thread Eddie Bush
Suggestion: Search the archive. This is a very frequently asked question. What you want to do is the same as everyone else using FORM-based CMA. The fact is that it doesn't work on a let basis; rather a make basis. One hint I will give you: the container is going to load all of a user's

Re: a 'one-click' j_securty_check question

2002-09-05 Thread jfc
Eddie Bush wrote: Suggestion: Search the archive. This is a very frequently asked question. What you want to do is the same as everyone else using FORM-based CMA. The fact is that it doesn't work on a let basis; rather a make basis. One hint I will give you: the container is going

Re: a 'one-click' j_securty_check question

2002-09-05 Thread jfc
David Cassidy wrote: i think that unless Im completly missing your point your missing the Realm's point. (Or I am) When you log in using the realm it takes from the database all your associated roles. ie if you have admin, editor and journo roles but you only need 'editor' role for the