controller pattern and security
John Gregg wrote:
Hi all.
I've been thinking about how the j2ee front controller
pattern (used by
Struts et al.) does/does not take advantage of url-based
authorization
constraints in web.xml. I want to avoid having to check
roles in my own
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Les Hughes wrote:
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 08:32:53 +0100
From: Les Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: front controller pattern and security
And of course, static role based
John Gregg wrote:
Hi all.
I've been thinking about how the j2ee front controller pattern (used by
Struts et al.) does/does not take advantage of url-based authorization
constraints in web.xml. I want to avoid having to check roles in my own
code as much as possible. At first I thought I
Hi all.
I've been thinking about how the j2ee front controller pattern (used by
Struts et al.) does/does not take advantage of url-based authorization
constraints in web.xml. I want to avoid having to check roles in my own
code as much as possible. At first I thought I could declare a URL like
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, John Gregg wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:44:15 -0500
From: John Gregg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: front controller pattern and security
Hi all.
I've been thinking about
