Yes, CoyoteConnector fully supports JK. Its what I use in production. I
would avoid Ajp13Connector, unless you need it.
I would use the actual source for the connectors:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/
If you want ot post your JK problems to the list, we can help.
thanks!
Jamey
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:23 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk and Coyote connector
Yes, CoyoteConnector fully supports JK. Its what I use in production. I
would avoid Ajp13Connector
: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:23 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk and Coyote connector
Yes, CoyoteConnector fully supports JK. Its what I use in production. I
would avoid Ajp13Connector, unless you need it.
I would use the actual source for the connectors:
http://jakarta.apache.org
=lb:balanced
# Status URI mapping (should not be publicly accessible!!!)
[uri:/jkstatus]
group=status:status
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 9:31 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk and Coyote connector
Development
Not that I've had any luck getting mod_jk to work with either the legacy
Ajp13Connector or the CoyoteConnector but which one should be used? I know that the
CoyoteConnector is required for mod_jk2 and I've had that working (mostly, occasional
lapses in communication, see other messages to user
