On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 16:46:44 +0100 Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don_t understand; If you want jars from the war-specific WEB-INF/lib > to be used BEFORE the common/lib version, then the default classloading > order (child-first) is exactly what you want, isn_t it? yes, in my example, it's exactly this. > > It_s the other order I_m puzzled about: why someone would want > common/lib to come before WEB-INF/lib (parent-first). > Sorry, I have no example for this use; Perhaps for better performances (when you know that classes are in the parent classloader) ... or perhaps this feature is mandatory ?... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
