There is an excellent article at The ServerSide about adding in-memory
session sharing across Tomcat engines :
http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=Tomcat
Using an RDBMS as the session store would add a high degree of
resiliency at the cost of performance. The approach above
I bet you're not setting the MIME type of the response correctly (can't
remember the API call off the top of my head). But the default is not
text/html, and Mozilla correctly asks the user what to do. Internet
Explorer treis to guess the content type from the stream, so you can
often get away
You may have already tried this, but you could always download a different
servlet engine such as JRun and try out your servlets with the new engine.
If you see the same problems then the problem probably isn't with tomcat.
Jon.
On Thursday 12 April 2001 08:34, you wrote:
- Original
Hi Shravan,
I've recently had the same situation and we solved it thus :
Encapsulate the lengthy process in an object that implements Runnable,
complete with an isFinished() call. Start a seperate thread to execute this
and place the object in the httpsession. Send a page back to the user
On Monday 23 April 2001 09:05, Endre Stølsvik wrote:
Basically different threads, differnt stacks.. Each thread is executing
the function with it's own little memory-space, and thus each users have
their own rendering of the servlet. But if you use class fields
(variables) you'll get that
Not that I don't believe you, but double check your classpath by creating a
simple servlet in the same web application that does:
log(Classpath is + System.getProperty(java.class.path))
On Monday 11 June 2001 18:30, Jim Michael wrote:
Does *anyone* in the known universe know how to get
Well, funnily enough I've just done some stress testing with our web app
against Apache Tomcat and Apache Resin.
With 100 concurrent connections Resin locked up the server (a Solaris 8
Ultra 10) because the mod_caucho uses precess forking which ran out of
space.
mod_jk, on the other hand,
Hi Joel,
Are you using Win95 or similar ? These tend to have small environment
spaces command line lengths, which is what you are seeing. You can get
around these (a bit) by setting more environment space in your DOS box.
However, a better solution is to use a generic solution where a Win32
-Original Message-
From: Jon Barber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 4:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Super Newbie...
Hi Joel,
Are you using Win95 or similar ? These tend to have small environment
spaces command line lengths, which is what you are seeing. You
This is probably going off the topic somewhat, but seeing how critical this
seems to be (replication etc) are you sure about using MySQL ? I understand
it doesn't support transactions (or didn't until recently). Are you happy
that you data integrity is assured ?
Jon.
On Wednesday 10
samckins wrote:
Thanks for all the help.
I will have access to a writ able drive and will direct outputs accordingly.
Well, maybe not Have a look at the Knoppix Linux project. This is a
Linux distro that runs from CD, and sets up RAM disk for write
operations. I've always wanted to set
11 matches
Mail list logo
