Re: Tomcat 5.5.12 and user-agent header

2005-10-12 Thread Jess Holle
Does this only occur when connecting directly to Tomcat or is it also an issue when going through Apache and mod_jk? Richard Mixon wrote: OK - yes, it was lack of sleep that was causing the problem to not appear, I was starting Tomcat 5.5.9 instead of 5.5.12, sorry :( The problem is still

Re: Tomcat 5.5.12 and user-agent header

2005-10-12 Thread Jess Holle
work with Tomcat standalone? I'm wondering whether any issue that exists is Tomcat-wide or specific to the HTTP connector (or to the new AJP-based connectors for that matter). -- Jess Holle - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Generic Types support in Tomcat?

2005-09-27 Thread Jess Holle
Dumb question: How does one enable 1.5 source features in post 5.5.9 Tomcats? I know how you can do it with the latest 5.0 sources (i.e. with Ant JSP compilation) but I'm still at 5.5.9 and wondering how this is controlled in 5.5.12. -- Jess Holle Nikola Milutinovic wrote: Seak, Teng

Re: .asp and tomcat 5.5.9

2005-05-12 Thread Jess Holle
requests to *.jsp counterparts. That seems cleanest in that you don't have to retrain IDE's or anything else to treate .asp as .jsp. -- Jess Holle - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: FW: Tomcat 5.5 and IIS 6.0 connecter problem.

2005-05-03 Thread Jess Holle
Don't use isapi_redirector2 -- development on it has ceased and it is unsupported. Instead use the latest isapi_redirect. charles doweary wrote: From: charles doweary [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 5.5 and IIS 6.0 connecter problem.

Re: Clustering application scope replication

2005-04-22 Thread Jess Holle
The servlet spec says this data is local to a given JVM. I suppose a servlet engine could expand beyond the spec, but I'd be surprised if Tomcat did here. Joakim Ahlén wrote: Hi! We have a cluster of two tomcat 5.5.9-machines using session replication. However, we also have data in application

Re: Can't do logout in basic authentication

2005-04-20 Thread Jess Holle
really good case for a logout is where you have a shared computer with many different users coming and going -- and all using a single guest account on the client itself rather than separate logins. In this case a logoff button that closed down the browser would not be a half bad idea :-) -- Jess

Re: Can't do logout in basic authentication

2005-04-20 Thread Jess Holle
P.S. Freeing one's *session* on leaving works with any type of authentication and makes sense in many cases -- it's just harder to communicate this concept to the user... Jess Holle wrote: In most applications this is one of those *perceived* problems that corporate users get uptight about

Re: PersistentManager

2005-04-19 Thread Jess Holle
Considering there are a number of issues with it (that I provided patches for a while back that were not accepted) I'd say it should be. Also session passivation and activation listeners are not called... Ron Crayton wrote: The documentation for the PersistentManager has contained the following

Re: Performance monitoring

2005-04-05 Thread Jess Holle
Somewhere one does cross the hazy Heisenberg uncertainty principal line, i.e. noticeably impacting performance by trying to hard to measure performance... -- Jess Holle e wrote: http://mc4j.sourceforge.net/ScreenShots.html On Apr 5, 2005 2:20 PM, Tony Tomcat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I started writing

Re: CERT Vulnerability Note VU#204710 on Tomcat 3.x

2005-03-23 Thread Jess Holle
-Original Message- From: Jess Holle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 7:42 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: CERT Vulnerability Note VU#204710 on Tomcat 3.x This vulnerability note has to be amongst the most vague and least informative I've ever seen. It says

Re: RE : tomcat-user Digest 20 Mar 2005 16:09:13 -0000 Issue 5487

2005-03-21 Thread Jess Holle
Isn't a firewall what you really want/need, i.e. to disallow connections to port 8009 except when they come from your IIS server? VAN DER MARLIERE FREDERIC wrote: In fact, what I really want is to prevent any other IIS or Apache to connect to my 8009 connector port, for my IIS machine is used

Re: CERT Vulnerability Note VU#204710 on Tomcat 3.x

2005-03-21 Thread Jess Holle
of these variations. On the other hand, any production installation should block communication on the AJP 12 or AJP13 port except where it is coming from Apache. This completely addresses the vulnerability irrespective of version. -- Jess Holle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, CERT released a vulnerability note

Re: CERT Vulnerability Note VU#204710 on Tomcat 3.x

2005-03-21 Thread Jess Holle
Bill Barker wrote: Jess Holle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This vulnerability note has to be amongst the most vague and least informative I've ever seen. It says that Tomcat 3.x and AJP12 has an issue and that the issue is not present in Tomcat 5. What about

Re: Logging in Tomcat 5.5

2005-03-18 Thread Jess Holle
static/classloader-based LoggerRepository, and this keeps Tomcat's logs using their own LoggerRepository and a separate logging configuration. I'm still not to where I want to be with this, but it's a far cry from the out-of-the-box mess that occurs with log4j and commons-logging. -- Jess Holle

Web apps vs. Logging vs. Tomcat

2005-03-17 Thread Jess Holle
LoggerRepository -- which would be fine if these loggers were not shared with other web apps. What's the solution here? Do I have to put log4j into Tomcat's lib directories to force it to use its own centralized log4j? Is that the best solution? -- Jess Holle

Tomcat 3.3 Release Date?

2001-08-22 Thread Jess Holle and Wendy Vidlak
Can anyone shed any light as to when Tomcat 3.3 will actually be released (i.e. as a non-beta release)? What are the open/known issues? [I checked CVS, dev-mailing list, and Bugzilla to no avail.] -- Jess Holle

RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3

2001-08-01 Thread Jess Holle and Wendy Vidlak
A better question is why Tomcat 3.3 which has the critical classloader separation feature as well as performance improvements over 3.2.1 has not yet been released. As the previous message said, many of us have to use released software *period*. Jess Holle -Original Message- From: Craig

RE: Beyond Tomcat 4..?

2001-08-01 Thread Jess Holle and Wendy Vidlak
a purely text-based configuration capability, and that doesn't mean 'regedit', like Apache to simplify automated configuration.] Jess Holle -Original Message- From: Curtis Dougherty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 1:31 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED

ETA for 3.3???

2001-04-11 Thread Jess Holle and Wendy Vidlak
What is the expected time of arrival / release of Tomcat 3.3??? It's been at the same milestone seemingly for aeons while Tomcat 4.0 continues to show more obvious (to those not doing lots of CVS snooping) signs of progress. Problem is we need 3.3 ASAP whereas 4.0 is "out there". -- Jess Holle

RE: Xalan2 in server environment (was Xalan2 Stree Module spans sec ondthread to do transform?)

2001-01-10 Thread Jess Holle and Wendy Vidlak
Still, there *are* algorithms which should be threaded and EJB shouldn't make it a supreme pain to do this! -- Jess Holle -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 2:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject