else can I get a thread dump?
I have Debian Linux 2.4.24 for what it's worth.
Malcolm Warren
Wade Chandler wrote:
--- David Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) We have only a moderately busy site with about
500 new visitors
entering from outside every day, so it would have
P.S. I've found the stack trace in catalina.out.
I thought I could pipe it to a file, but never mind.
Anyway thankyou for your help, I think I can get to the bottom of it all
now.
Wade Chandler wrote:
--- David Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) We have only a moderately busy site with
here.
Thanks for any help on this.
Regards,
Malcolm Warren
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
The tomcat session manager is the default one, in fact there is no session
manager visibly enabled in server.xml, so everything is default.
Has anybody got any ideas what is going on and what I should do?
Regards,
Malcolm Warren
-
From: Malcolm Warren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jsessionid parameter not being accepted
I have done my own url re-writing manually to cater for those
browsers who have turned off cookies.
i.e. I have manually added ?jsessionid
OK, I think I'll have to re-write, at least that way I eliminate
incompatibility across servlet containers.
Thanks everyone for your advice.
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:46:53 +0400, Veniamin Fichin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Malcolm Warren wrote:
I wish it was as easy as you say...
I know that I
ideas?
Thanks for your time,
Malcolm Warren
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm switching from Basic (with SSL) to Form authentication (also with SSL
of course).
This has caused a problem with one particular application, which opens a
socket on a .jsp page, collects the html code and saves it disk. The html
code is then later used by a fax application to send a fax.
, and I'd
like to continue using this programme, but I have to tell the new FORM
version that I've already signed in, and I don't know how.
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:10:18 -0600, QM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 04:38:49PM +0200, Malcolm Warren wrote:
: With BASIC authorization, which
That's not quite what I meant, but I shan't want to bother people any more
with this question.
I can get along with what you told me in another email.
Thanks for you time.
Malcolm Warren
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:06:51 -0600, QM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: The automatically generated .class files
Message-
From: Malcolm Warren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 10:12 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: How does Tomcat manage Form-based authentication?
I'm using an old nuts and bolts programme that actually
programmatically sent the Authorization header string
I'd be very interested to hear how one can allocate memory without it
being de-referenced.
It's obviously something to avoid. Can you give a bit of detail?
Thanks.
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:28:22 -0600, John Thompson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been fighting a similar symptom. I downloaded the
there in
the file system, if you see what I mean. It would have been nice if the
package logic had been followed through.
Regards,
Malcolm Warren
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:50:41 -0600, QM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 02:55:16PM +0200, Malcolm Warren wrote:
: Now when I transfer
With BASIC authorization, which I used to use, the browser was sent an
Authorization header.
This doesn't happen with FORM-based authorization.
I believe Tomcat deals with it all, but how? Anybody know?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
features with Tomcat 4.1, than I did
with Jrun 3.1, but this particular possibility seems to me to be a good
one. I have tried creating .jar files of the Tomcat's /work directory but
without any success.
Can anybody enlighten me? Thanks for any help.
Regards,
Malcolm Warren
helpful.
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 06:00:22 -0600, QM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 12:02:40PM +0200, Malcolm Warren wrote:
: Jrun gave an additional security possibility that I am unable to
extend to
: Tomcat. In Jrun you do not need to place your .jsp files, nor the
: automatically
Ok, thanks. That looks like what I'm looking for.
Sorry I didn't catch on after your first missive.
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:50:41 -0600, QM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 02:55:16PM +0200, Malcolm Warren wrote:
: Now when I transfer everything to my production server I would like
, like the Apache option includeNoExec?
Thanks.
Malcolm Warren
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be appreciated.
Regards,
Malcolm Warren
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
know why this happens in the Java web Services
Development Pack unlike the normal Tomcat distribution, which I have read
in several places does not have the same problem? There must be a reason,
which is worrying me
Thanks.
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:55:13 +0100, Malcolm Warren
[EMAIL
Thanks to anyone who read this email.
But I've found a hack - or anyway I may just abandon JavaWebServices and
go for Tomcat on its own.
So don't worry about replying to this problem any more.
Malcolm Warren
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:55:13 +0100, Malcolm Warren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have
21 matches
Mail list logo
