Hello,
I have a tomcat server which serves some webapps for different purposes.
I now would like to have another instance of the the manager webapp just
for one of the webapps on this server, that another person can use the
manager webapp to administer this one special webapp and not
all the
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:00:24PM +0200, Marcus Franke wrote:
Hello,
I have a tomcat server which serves some webapps for different purposes.
I now would like to have another instance of the the manager webapp just
for one of the webapps on this server, that another person can use
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 05:13:33PM +0200, Marcus Franke wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:00:24PM +0200, Marcus Franke wrote:
Can this be done? And if yes, what do I have to do?
Hmm, I guess I can answer that question by myself. If I use
vhosts in tomcat and I have just the manager
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 05:47:00PM +0200, Marcus Franke wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 05:13:33PM +0200, Marcus Franke wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:00:24PM +0200, Marcus Franke wrote:
Can this be done? And if yes, what do I have to do?
Hmm, I guess I can answer
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:28:23PM -0700, Bill Barker wrote:
James Rome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Most of the installed Tomcat classes have something like
container.isDebugEnabled() {...}
How do I enable these debug statements in Tomcat 5.5?
I'll
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 04:41:32PM +0200, Marcus Franke wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:28:23PM -0700, Bill Barker wrote:
# Default global logging level.
# This specifies which kinds of events are logged across
# all loggers. For any given facility this global level
# can be overriden
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 05:20:07PM +0200, Marcus Franke wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 04:41:32PM +0200, Marcus Franke wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:28:23PM -0700, Bill Barker wrote:
# Default global logging level.
# This specifies which kinds of events are logged across
# all
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:36:55AM -0700, krux mania wrote:
Hi,
I need to install tomcat 5.0.28 silently for my application. Can this be done.
If this issue has been previously discussed please send me a pointer to the
message.
What do you mean with silent installation?
Marcus
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:11:30AM -0700, krux mania wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Silent installation also referred to as batch installation is the process
where the install takes place without presenting any dialogs to the user. The
user input is put into a properties file and the installation takes
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:53:36AM -0700, Rick wrote:
Jean-Marc,
Actually, without the connectionTimeout set, jk seems to hold on to its
connections indefinitely and after a while, the apache to tomcat connection
hangs (pages quit serving). Could you tell me which combo of versions you
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:40:38AM -0700, Rick wrote:
Thanks Jean-Marc,
After checking over my workers.properties, orginally configured by someone
else, it appears to be missing some of the connection timeout handling
properties you have listed in yours. I'm guessing this is the root of my
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:24:27PM +0100, Allistair Crossley wrote:
Hi,
looks like jk is using commons logging, you'll have better success using a
log4j or commons-logging properties configuration to set the threshold to
ERROR. you may be able to do that in jk's config files too, i am sure
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:14:58AM -0700, Mark Eggers wrote:
https is port 443. You need to to uncomment the HTTP
1.1 connector for 8443 and change the port to 443.
Uncomment the following connector in server.xml:
!-- Define a SSL HTTP/1.1 Connector on port 8443 --
!--
Connector
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 04:24:08PM -0700, Rick wrote:
We had an issue where it seemed like it would crash using mod_jk, the
trouble was the connections were not letting go. By default, I think the
timeout is infinite, so after setting the property: connectionTimeout, in
the server.xml's
Hello,
when I look in the manager/status page I sometimes see threads in status
keep-alive that are
very old, have atm some which are 70700177ms old, which is over 19 hours.
These threads have no longer any connection to the apache server, which invoked
them, as
I restarted the responsible
15 matches
Mail list logo
