Re: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer

2005-10-11 Thread Glen Mazza
What happens if you deploy using the Tomcat manager application? Same error or doesn't occur then? This may help zero in on the problem. Glen Allistair Crossley wrote: Hi List, Honestly, I wish Tomcat web application deployment would be easier/smarter. To pre-empt certain list members

RE: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer [255790:132313]

2005-10-07 Thread RTE - Meridian Club
Many thanks for your email. This is an automated response acknowledging receipt. Please be advised that Badge mailing commences beginning of October 2005. Should your message require a response we will respond shortly. Regards Meridian Club -Original Message- From: Allistair

RE: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer

2005-10-07 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer deploy: [deploy] OK - Deployed application at context path /ROOT So it's deployed OK. I suspect all that means is that it was successfully copied to webapps, but I'm not

RE: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer [255802:132327]

2005-10-07 Thread RTE - Meridian Club
, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: 10/7/2005 5:01 PM To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: RE: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer deploy

RE: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer

2005-10-07 Thread Allistair Crossley
Subject: RE: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer deploy: [deploy] OK - Deployed application at context path /ROOT So it's deployed OK. I suspect all that means

RE: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer [255805:132330]

2005-10-07 Thread RTE - Meridian Club
Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: 10/7/2005 5:11 PM To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: RE: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer Hi, Thanks for your thoughts. I agree, deployed OK certainly does not mean a valid deployment ;) The docs say of docBase

RE: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer

2005-10-07 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer The thing is, I do not wish to execute directly from the WAR as that would be inefficient. If you only have classes (as opposed to resource files) I don't think it will make

RE: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer [255810:132337]

2005-10-07 Thread RTE - Meridian Club
, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: 10/7/2005 5:21 PM To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: RE: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer The thing

RE: Continuing Frustration and Misery with Deployer

2005-10-07 Thread Allistair Crossley
Hi, The thing is, I do not wish to execute directly from the WAR as that would be inefficient. If you only have classes (as opposed to resource files) I don't think it will make a difference. If you do have other resources in there, then yes, expanding the war would probably be