Hi all,
What people here think about this article.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
The Apache lists modifies reply-to field and put in the list
address. Is this acceptable ?
rgds
Antony Paul
-
To
Werks fer me.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:59:03 +0530, Antony Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
What people here think about this article.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
The Apache lists modifies reply-to field and put in the list
address. Is this acceptable ?
@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 11:29 PM
Subject: [OT] Modifying Reply-To header in list messages
Hi all,
What people here think about this article.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
The Apache lists modifies reply-to field and put in the list
address
On Jan 20, 2005, at 05:29, Antony Paul wrote:
What people here think about this article.
Chip Rosenthal Considered Harmful?!?
Regarding Munging... well... in short... the entire email chain is
very much about munging in the first place...
Is this acceptable ?
Oh, my... a question as old as
