With this amount of users I wouldn't think about caching the html output for dynamic elements.
What we do is to cache essential data from the database and generate the pages on the fly. That design works with several 1000 hits an hour. (Not with tomcat but with jserv and gnujsp, but I don't have doubts that tomcat will perform equal) > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jacob Hookom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Montag, 24. Juni 2002 19:34 > An: Tomcat Users List > Betreff: Design Question: Static vs. Dynamic > > Is it traditional practice to write long term data to static html like > large scale sites such as cnet, or zdnet (links such as > 1109200304,43904043A,44032.html)? If so, how do they bring in dynamic > elements? Or, in your own experience, have you found benefits from > transferring bits of page content to static hmtl (OSCache for > example)? > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
