I don't speek C and I don't know how to build mod_jk2.dll - sorry.
--
Oliver Lauer
Stadtsparkasse Köln
512 / BK / Anwendungsentwicklung
Telefon: (0221) 226 - 5562
Fax: (0221) 226 - 5100
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sk-koeln.de
Milt Epstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 19.09.2002
+ Tomcat4.1.10 + coyote + jk2 +
cookies + winNT
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Milt,
yes, both values are distinct and both are true as well. It seems to
be a bug in the brand new jk2!?
Do you know how I can find out what jk2 sends back to Apache2
private final static
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Milt,
I've filed a bug and found an old one concerning the same problem.
Yes I know some of these debugging parameters but I couldn't bring the
jk2-connecting to be a bit more chattily...
Did somebody here bring AP2,TC4.1,JK2,WINNT/2000 to
Hi,
even if try the workaround
res.setHeader(Set-Cookie,KIB=a03056; Domain=.sk-koeln.de; Path=/);
res.setHeader(Set-Cookie,FStatus=a03056; Domain=.sk-koeln.de; Path=/);
only the last one (cookie) will be set ?
Does anybody know any workaround for that situation ?
Thanx
Oliver
Oliver Lauer
Hi Milt,
yes, both values are distinct and both are true as well. It seems to be a
bug in the brand new jk2!?
Do you know how I can find out what jk2 sends back to Apache2
private final static String COOKIE_KEY_FS = FStatus;
private final static String COOKIE_KEY_KIB = KIB;
Oliver
Hi,
it seems to be a bug - see bug 10891 - bugzilla (07.17.2002)
Oliver
--
Oliver Lauer
Stadtsparkasse Köln
512 / BK / Anwendungsentwicklung
Telefon: (0221) 226 - 5562
Fax: (0221) 226 - 5100
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sk-koeln.de
Milt Epstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 16.09.2002
-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Montag, 16. September 2002 17:52
An: Tomcat Users List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Antwort: Re: Apache2 + Tomcat4.1.10 + coyote + jk2 +
cookies + winNT
res.setHeader(Set-Cookie,KIB=a03056; Domain=.sk-koeln.de; Path
are cleared and replaced
with the new value...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Montag, 16. September 2002 17:52
An: Tomcat Users List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Antwort: Re: Apache2 + Tomcat4.1.10 + coyote + jk2 +
cookies
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Milt,
yes, both values are distinct and both are true as well. It seems to
be a bug in the brand new jk2!?
Do you know how I can find out what jk2 sends back to Apache2
private final static String COOKIE_KEY_FS = FStatus;
private
PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Antwort: Re: Apache2 + Tomcat4.1.10 + coyote + jk2 +
cookies + winNT
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Milt,
yes, both values are distinct and both are true as well. It seems to
be a bug in the brand new jk2!?
Do you know
Hi Milt,
I've filed a bug and found an old one concerning the same problem.
Yes I know some of these debugging parameters but I couldn't bring the
jk2-connecting to be a bit more chattily...
Did somebody here bring AP2,TC4.1,JK2,WINNT/2000 to respond with more than
cookie within one response ?
11 matches
Mail list logo
