RE: Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2

2004-02-08 Thread David Short
Not sure what you're asking ... -Original Message- From: Enrique Herrera Noya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 9:12 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2 Filip Hanik (lists) wrote: downgrade to 4.1.27that should

Re: Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2

2004-02-08 Thread Terry Gregory
If you have Apache/Tomcat running as a single instance or context, but not Apache as a stand alone, can you still use httpd.conf and .htaccess to tweak settings. The problem I am having is that I have a servlet that will not run on Netscape (doesn't matter what version). It's just treating it

Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2

2004-02-07 Thread David Short
Does anyone have Tomcat 4.1.29 running in-process with Apache 2.0.48 and mod_jk2 on W2K? I keep getting the following error when I start Apache: [Sat Feb 07 17:30:16 2004] [notice] Parent: Created child process 3192 [Sat Feb 07 17:30:16 2004] [notice] Child 3192: Child process is running

RE: Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2

2004-02-07 Thread Filip Hanik \(lists\)
downgrade to 4.1.27that should solve it :) Filip -Original Message- From: David Short [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 5:37 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2 Does anyone have Tomcat 4.1.29 running in-process

Re: Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2

2004-02-07 Thread Enrique Herrera Noya
PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2 Does anyone have Tomcat 4.1.29 running in-process with Apache 2.0.48 and mod_jk2 on W2K? I keep getting the following error when I start Apache: [Sat Feb 07 17:30:16 2004] [notice] Parent: Created child process 3192 [Sat

It's Working !!!!! - Need Help - JDBC MySQL Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2 + Windows 2000 Server ( No IIS)

2003-12-29 Thread Lenny Sorey
Please disregard my last 12/28/2003 request for help. I now have Windows 2000 Server ( No IIS), Tomcat 4.1.29, Apache 2.0.48, Mod_jk2 and MySQL 4.1.0 working together in concert. Man, it's pretty cool when everything works together. I'd like to thanks everyone who answered my requests and

Fwd: Need Help - JDBC MySQL + Velocity - Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2 + Windows 2000 Server ( No IIS)

2003-12-28 Thread Lenny Sorey
+ Velocity - Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2 + Windows 2000 Server ( No IIS) I currently have Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2 + Windows 2000 Server ( No IIS) partially working. I get the static content served via http://mysite. This displays the index.jsp which has not database

Need Help - JDBC MySQL + Velocity - Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2 + Windows 2000 Server ( No IIS)

2003-12-27 Thread Lenny Sorey
I currently have Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2 + Windows 2000 Server ( No IIS) partially working. I get the static content served via http://mysite. This displays the index.jsp which has not database connection. First of all, I will have to share two web sites with one IP address

Need Help - Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2 + Windows 2000 Server ( No IIS)

2003-12-26 Thread Lenny Sorey
. http.conf 4. server.xml Items 3 4 if there is anything different from mod_jk set up. I've tried all the examples I can find regarding Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2 + Windows 2000 Server and I cannot get anything working. Reading on the Tomcat User List regarding mod_jk2, for those who have

Re: Need Help - Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2 + Windows 2000 Server ( No IIS)

2003-12-26 Thread Mark Eggers
Check http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?TomcatWeb and see if that information helps. /mde/ just my two cents . . . . __ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/