Performance implications of running direct from WAR?

2004-08-20 Thread Allistair Crossley
Hi Guys,

Are there any performance implications of running straight from a WAR for Tomcat? Does 
it uncompress the WAR each time .. how is this handled?

Cheers, Allistair


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Performance implications of running direct from WAR?

2004-08-20 Thread John Villar
The only performance hit is the first thime when the war is deployed on 
the context path, from there on your app runs from the deployed files.

Allistair Crossley escribió:
Hi Guys,
Are there any performance implications of running straight from a WAR for Tomcat? Does 
it uncompress the WAR each time .. how is this handled?
Cheers, Allistair
FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Performance implications of running direct from WAR?

2004-08-20 Thread Allistair Crossley
So are you saying Host unpackWAR=false ..  still means the files are deployed 
somewhere?

Allistair Crossley

 -Original Message-
 From: John Villar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 20 August 2004 15:40
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Performance implications of running direct from WAR?
 
 
 The only performance hit is the first thime when the war is 
 deployed on 
 the context path, from there on your app runs from the 
 deployed files.
 
 Allistair Crossley escribió:
 
 Hi Guys,
 
 Are there any performance implications of running straight 
 from a WAR for Tomcat? Does it uncompress the WAR each time 
 .. how is this handled?
 
 Cheers, Allistair
 
 
 FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
 ---
 QAS Ltd.
 Developers of QuickAddress Software
 a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
 Registered in England: No 2582055
 Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
 ---
 /FONT
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Performance implications of running direct from WAR?

2004-08-20 Thread John Villar
another fact that really matters is your hardware specially if what 
you say about you traffic is true.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Performance implications of running direct from WAR?

2004-08-20 Thread John Villar

So are you saying Host unpackWAR=false ..  still means the files are deployed somewhere?
 

in that case it probably represents an unnecesary performance hit, 
because what i said before is for the default tomcat configuration, 
which i assumed was yours why would you want tomcat to not unpack 
the war files?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Performance implications of running direct from WAR?

2004-08-20 Thread Allistair Crossley
I'm struggling with the TC manager app/docs etc... and thought if just one file sat 
there I could deloy a new one easily and quickly. My Ant DIST target generates me a 
WAR. In an ideal world I would like to be able to either use a web UI to upload, or 
drop this WAR on top of the existing one in webapps and have Tomcat undeploy the old 
and deploy the new. I am just not getting how to do this. Everytime I deploy I stop 
Tomcat, delete the old war and expanded files and put the new WAR in webapps and 
restart tomcat where it then expands all the files. of course, it still does not work, 
and I have to restart tomcat to get it to to actually start seeing the files as it 
were to serve requests.

Allistair Crossley

 -Original Message-
 From: John Villar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 20 August 2004 15:48
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Performance implications of running direct from WAR?
 
 
 
 So are you saying Host unpackWAR=false ..  still means 
 the files are deployed somewhere?
   
 
 in that case it probably represents an unnecesary performance hit, 
 because what i said before is for the default tomcat configuration, 
 which i assumed was yours why would you want tomcat to not unpack 
 the war files?
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE 
---
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
---
/FONT


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Performance implications of running direct from WAR?

2004-08-20 Thread Shapira, Yoav

Hi,
There's no significant performance difference.  But like all such
questions, spend time benchmarking instead of asking on the list and
waiting for responses ;)  This is the type of question that's easily
settled with a five minute JMeter test ;)  Who knows, you might even
find something surprising like a three-fold increase when running with a
packed WAR ;)  (This is in good spirit, joking ;))


Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics


-Original Message-
From: John Villar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 10:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Performance implications of running direct from WAR?

another fact that really matters is your hardware specially if what
you say about you traffic is true.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and 
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This 
e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be 
saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) 
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system 
and notify the sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[OF] Re: Performance implications of running direct from WAR?

2004-08-20 Thread John Villar

 Who knows, you might even
find something surprising like a three-fold increase when running with a
packed WAR ;)  (This is in good spirit, joking ;))
 

LOL
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]