RE: Documentation ... : Your Advices please

2005-06-22 Thread Sue Roe
I think most people would probably use later versions of both Java and
Tomcat if they were going to set an environment up from scratch now. So I
would suggest it better for you to upgrade now and document for later
releases.

Rgds

-Original Message-
From: Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: 22 June 2005 09:14
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: Documentation ... : Your Advices please 

Hello All,
I am thinking of writing a document of how to set up. Apache +
tomcat + mod_jk with Apache using SSL. for free.
I am using Apache 1.3.* and Tomcat 4.1 and this works very nicely
 I have this running on my linux box for 2 years + now. 

I need your advice if I create a document of how to setup this will
it be use full. I am thinking that tomcat now being 5.5.* and 
apache 2.0.* will it be worth my time for the peoplpe or do you
think I should upgrade as well 

Regards
Guru 

Gurumoorthy Raghupathy
EMFS - Fidelity Investments International
* Tel: +44 1737 836798
* Internal: 8-724 6798
* Tel (R): +442086423806
* Mail-Zone : XTB2B
* E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Regret for the things we did can be tempered by time; it is regret for the
things we did not do that is inconsolable

Important: Fidelity Investments International, Fidelity Investment Services
Limited, Fidelity Pensions Management and Financial Administration Services
Limited (a Fidelity Group company) are all authorised and regulated in the
UK by the Financial Services Authority and have their registered offices at
Oakhill House, 130 Tonbridge Road, Hildenborough, Tonbridge, Kent TN11 9DZ.
Tel 01732 361144. Fidelity only gives information on products and does not
give investment advice to private clients based on individual circumstances.
Any comments or statements made are not necessarily those of Fidelity. The
information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from any computer. All e-mails sent from or to Fidelity may be
subject to our monitoring procedures. 'Direct link to Fidelitys website.
http://www.fidelity-international.com/world/index.html
http://www.fidelity-international.com/world/index.html 




***Disclaimer***

The contents of this Email may be privileged and are confidential. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action 
taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be 
unlawful.

Should you wish to use Email as a mode of communication, CMi plc and its 
subsidiaries are unable to guarantee the security of Email content outside of 
our own computer systems.

This footnote also confirms that this Email message has been checked by 
MIMESweeper for the presence of computer viruses. Whilst we run anti-virus 
software, you are solely responsible for ensuring that any Email or attachment 
you receive is virus free. We disclaim any liability for any damage you suffer 
as a consequence of receiving any virus.

Checkmate International plc (CMi)
Registered in England No: 1899857
Registered Office 4th Floor, 35 New Bridge Street, London, EC4V 6BW


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Documentation

2004-12-07 Thread Shapira, Yoav

Hi,

Where can I find documentation about Tomcat looger, and debug 
verbosity
params?


I change the debug and verbosity values, and the log is always the
same.

Different Tomcat versions have different ways to configure logging.
Make sure you're looking at the documentation for your Tomcat version.

The verbosity attribute is mostly for Tomcat 3.x.

The debug attribute, if allowed (the docs will list it if it's allowed),
goes from 0 (the default, no logging) to 99 (the highest, max logging).
But it's mostly used in Tomcat 4.x, and less in 5.x.

The more recent versions of Tomcat use Commons-Logging increasingly.  To
configure their logging, you need to pick an implementation (e.g. log4j
or JDK 1.4 logging) and configure Tomcat to use that logging
implementation with your chosen logging levels.  This is explained in
the FAQ and documentation (the latter only for Tomcat 5.5).

For Tomcat 5.5, there's no Logger, and no debug attributes, at all.
It's all Commons-Logging.

Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business 
communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary 
and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom 
it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by 
anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately 
delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Documentation

2004-12-07 Thread Pablo Carretero
Thanks Yoav, 

Maybe, I don't explain very well my case. For example, If I active the debug
in the database pool connection, can I see the active connection, free
connection, the queries, etc... 

Other example, I'm configuring a cluster in memory, I would like activate
the debug option, in order to know if the machines of the cluster is working
good or not. 

I mean, I looking for this documentation, but I find nothing about that. Do
you know if are there any documentation about this issues??



Thank a lot. 





-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: martes, 07 de diciembre de 2004 19:40
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Documentation


Hi,

Where can I find documentation about Tomcat looger, and debug 
verbosity
params?


I change the debug and verbosity values, and the log is always the
same.

Different Tomcat versions have different ways to configure logging.
Make sure you're looking at the documentation for your Tomcat version.

The verbosity attribute is mostly for Tomcat 3.x.

The debug attribute, if allowed (the docs will list it if it's allowed),
goes from 0 (the default, no logging) to 99 (the highest, max logging).
But it's mostly used in Tomcat 4.x, and less in 5.x.

The more recent versions of Tomcat use Commons-Logging increasingly.  To
configure their logging, you need to pick an implementation (e.g. log4j
or JDK 1.4 logging) and configure Tomcat to use that logging
implementation with your chosen logging levels.  This is explained in
the FAQ and documentation (the latter only for Tomcat 5.5).

For Tomcat 5.5, there's no Logger, and no debug attributes, at all.
It's all Commons-Logging.

Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary
and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to
whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or
used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please
immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the
sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Documentation

2004-12-07 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev
if you want to see cluster output, just configure debug for 
org.apache.catalina.cluster
using log4j for example

to setup log4j all I did was to add log4j.xml into common/classes and log4j.jar 
into common/lib

Filip

- Original Message - 
From: Pablo Carretero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 1:34 PM
Subject: RE: Documentation


Thanks Yoav, 

Maybe, I don't explain very well my case. For example, If I active the debug
in the database pool connection, can I see the active connection, free
connection, the queries, etc... 

Other example, I'm configuring a cluster in memory, I would like activate
the debug option, in order to know if the machines of the cluster is working
good or not. 

I mean, I looking for this documentation, but I find nothing about that. Do
you know if are there any documentation about this issues??



Thank a lot. 





-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: martes, 07 de diciembre de 2004 19:40
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Documentation


Hi,

Where can I find documentation about Tomcat looger, and debug 
verbosity
params?


I change the debug and verbosity values, and the log is always the
same.

Different Tomcat versions have different ways to configure logging.
Make sure you're looking at the documentation for your Tomcat version.

The verbosity attribute is mostly for Tomcat 3.x.

The debug attribute, if allowed (the docs will list it if it's allowed),
goes from 0 (the default, no logging) to 99 (the highest, max logging).
But it's mostly used in Tomcat 4.x, and less in 5.x.

The more recent versions of Tomcat use Commons-Logging increasingly.  To
configure their logging, you need to pick an implementation (e.g. log4j
or JDK 1.4 logging) and configure Tomcat to use that logging
implementation with your chosen logging levels.  This is explained in
the FAQ and documentation (the latter only for Tomcat 5.5).

For Tomcat 5.5, there's no Logger, and no debug attributes, at all.
It's all Commons-Logging.

Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary
and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to
whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or
used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please
immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the
sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Documentation

2004-12-07 Thread Shapira, Yoav

Hi,

Maybe, I don't explain very well my case. For example, If I active the
debug
in the database pool connection, can I see the active connection, free
connection, the queries, etc...

There are two ways to determine what logging output you will see if you
enable debug-level logging for a given Tomcat component.  One way to is
try it.  The other way is to look at the source code, which of course is
freely available for you to download and examine.

If you look at the source, you will see that some components do more
logging than others.  So even setting debug-level logging for them might
not yield much information.

As to the specific question above about database pooling: because that's
not implemented by Tomcat, but by a pluggable implementation (DBCP by
default), it's up to the implementation's logging.  Again, you can try
it, or you can consult the DBCP source code.  Alternatively you can plug
in your own connection pooling implementation.

I mean, I looking for this documentation, but I find nothing about
that. Do
you know if are there any documentation about this issues??

What are you asking is generic.  Documentation for Tomcat's own logging
is covered under the Logger configuration reference and, for Tomcat 5.5,
in the logging-howto section of the docs.  There is also a FAQ entry
showing how to configure Tomcat 5.0.x with log4j.  For parts of the code
that are not Tomcat's own, e.g. DBCP, you need to consult that
component's documentation.

Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business 
communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary 
and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom 
it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by 
anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately 
delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Documentation

2004-12-07 Thread Pablo Carretero
Yoav and Filip, thanks a lot. 

I'm very new in the Open Source software, I good like the idea, and under my
point of view, is the best solution event the big companies. But for
beginner, is very difficult. 

Thank you very much I try continue with your indication. 

Best regards. 



-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: martes, 07 de diciembre de 2004 20:37
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Documentation


Hi,

Maybe, I don't explain very well my case. For example, If I active the
debug
in the database pool connection, can I see the active connection, free
connection, the queries, etc...

There are two ways to determine what logging output you will see if you
enable debug-level logging for a given Tomcat component.  One way to is
try it.  The other way is to look at the source code, which of course is
freely available for you to download and examine.

If you look at the source, you will see that some components do more
logging than others.  So even setting debug-level logging for them might
not yield much information.

As to the specific question above about database pooling: because that's
not implemented by Tomcat, but by a pluggable implementation (DBCP by
default), it's up to the implementation's logging.  Again, you can try
it, or you can consult the DBCP source code.  Alternatively you can plug
in your own connection pooling implementation.

I mean, I looking for this documentation, but I find nothing about
that. Do
you know if are there any documentation about this issues??

What are you asking is generic.  Documentation for Tomcat's own logging
is covered under the Logger configuration reference and, for Tomcat 5.5,
in the logging-howto section of the docs.  There is also a FAQ entry
showing how to configure Tomcat 5.0.x with log4j.  For parts of the code
that are not Tomcat's own, e.g. DBCP, you need to consult that
component's documentation.

Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary
and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to
whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or
used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please
immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the
sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Documentation

2004-12-07 Thread Shapira, Yoav

Hi,
No problem.  We're glad to help, and you should feel free to ask
questions.  That's why these mailing lists are here, and I think these
lists and forums are one of the better assets of open-source software.
Many paid support organizations have neither the expertise nor the
enthusiasm found on this list.

Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com


-Original Message-
From: Pablo Carretero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 3:01 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Documentation

Yoav and Filip, thanks a lot.

I'm very new in the Open Source software, I good like the idea, and
under
my
point of view, is the best solution event the big companies. But for
beginner, is very difficult.

Thank you very much I try continue with your indication.

Best regards.



-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: martes, 07 de diciembre de 2004 20:37
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Documentation


Hi,

Maybe, I don't explain very well my case. For example, If I active the
debug
in the database pool connection, can I see the active connection, free
connection, the queries, etc...

There are two ways to determine what logging output you will see if you
enable debug-level logging for a given Tomcat component.  One way to is
try it.  The other way is to look at the source code, which of course
is
freely available for you to download and examine.

If you look at the source, you will see that some components do more
logging than others.  So even setting debug-level logging for them
might
not yield much information.

As to the specific question above about database pooling: because
that's
not implemented by Tomcat, but by a pluggable implementation (DBCP by
default), it's up to the implementation's logging.  Again, you can try
it, or you can consult the DBCP source code.  Alternatively you can
plug
in your own connection pooling implementation.

I mean, I looking for this documentation, but I find nothing about
that. Do
you know if are there any documentation about this issues??

What are you asking is generic.  Documentation for Tomcat's own logging
is covered under the Logger configuration reference and, for Tomcat
5.5,
in the logging-howto section of the docs.  There is also a FAQ entry
showing how to configure Tomcat 5.0.x with log4j.  For parts of the
code
that are not Tomcat's own, e.g. DBCP, you need to consult that
component's documentation.

Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
communication, and may contain information that is confidential,
proprietary
and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s)
to
whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed
or
used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please
immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the
sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business 
communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary 
and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom 
it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by 
anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately 
delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Documentation

2004-12-07 Thread QM
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:01:07PM +0100, Pablo Carretero wrote:
: I'm very new in the Open Source software, I good like the idea, and under my
: point of view, is the best solution event the big companies. But for
: beginner, is very difficult. 

I'd argue that just about any software -- commercial or otherwise -- can
be difficult to grasp in the early days.  J2EE?  Systems administration?
Oracle?  The list goes on and on...

-QM

-- 

software  -- http://www.brandxdev.net
tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: documentation for ant tasks

2004-08-23 Thread Shapira, Yoav

Hi,
The Manager How-To has some ant details.  It has a lot of detail on the
actual Manager tasks (the same whether invoked from Ant or from the web
browser), which is probably what you want.  The actual Ant tasks don't
have any logic, they're just convenience wrappers for invocation via
Ant.


Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics


-Original Message-
From: Jeff Ousley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 6:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: documentation for ant tasks

hello!

is there anyplace where the catalina ant functions/tasks are
documented? i've searched but obviously i'm not looking in the proper
place.

thanks!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and 
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This 
e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be 
saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) 
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system 
and notify the sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: documentation on installing two instances of tomcat

2004-07-21 Thread Shapira, Yoav

Hi,
Here's some:
- Download tomcat .zip
- Unpack first installation to a directory of your choice, ports will be
8080 and 8005 by default
- Unpack second installation to a different directory of your choice
- Edit conf/server.xml of the second installation to something other
than 8005 and 8080, say 8006 and 8081.
- That's it.

Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics


-Original Message-
From: Yoo, Joon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 10:55 AM
To: ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: documentation on installing two instances of tomcat

Is there any documentation on running two instances of tomcat on the
same
Win2000 server and same IP but different ports?


Joon Yoo
Systems Administrator
Ladas  Parry LLC
26 West 61st Street
New York, NY 10023
tel:  (212) 708-1854
fax: (212) 246-8959





This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and 
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This 
e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be 
saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) 
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system 
and notify the sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: documentation on installing two instances of tomcat

2004-07-21 Thread Benjamin Armintor
You could also check out item (4) in RUNNING.txt under your Tomcat
install: Advanced Configuration - Multiple Tomcat 5 Instances.


Benjamin J. Armintor
Operations Systems Specialist
ITS-Systems: Mainframe Group
University of Texas - Austin
tele: (512) 232-6562
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 10:03 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: documentation on installing two instances of tomcat



Hi,
Here's some: 
- Download tomcat .zip
- Unpack first installation to a directory of your choice, ports will be
8080 and 8005 by default
- Unpack second installation to a different directory of your choice
- Edit conf/server.xml of the second installation to something other
than 8005 and 8080, say 8006 and 8081.
- That's it.

Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics


-Original Message-
From: Yoo, Joon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 10:55 AM
To: ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: documentation on installing two instances of tomcat

Is there any documentation on running two instances of tomcat on the
same
Win2000 server and same IP but different ports?


Joon Yoo
Systems Administrator
Ladas  Parry LLC
26 West 61st Street
New York, NY 10023
tel:  (212) 708-1854
fax: (212) 246-8959





This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
communication, and may contain information that is confidential,
proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the
individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied,
printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an)
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your
computer system and notify the sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: documentation to implement the Realm interface aside from javadoc s

2004-01-28 Thread Philipp von dem Bussche
Why not downloading the sources from jakarta.apache.org ??

Doyle, Daniel C wrote:
I am looking for examples, tutorials, or documentation for implementing the
org.apache.catalina.Realm ineterface. Can the Realm implementation point to
a servlet? I need to authenticate using a cgi script (don't laugh) on a
different web server on a different machine. The cgi will redirect its fail
or success response to a URL. Currently, we have the cgi redirect the fail
or success response to a JSP. Anyone have design suggestions when
implementing a Realm for this architecture. I would look at the code in the
CVS repository that currently implement the Realm interface, but I can't get
the code as the proxy(which I don't administrate) will not allow CVS
traffic(i.e. port not available).
 

Thank you for your time and consideration,

 

Dan Doyle




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: documentation to implement the Realm interface aside from javadocs

2004-01-27 Thread Shapira, Yoav

Howdy,

I am looking for examples, tutorials, or documentation for implementing
the

Examples:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/s
hare/org/apache/catalina/realm/.  Also search the list archives for past
discussions on this topic.  And as evidenced from the link above, you
can use ViewCVS over HTTP if your proxy/firewall doesn't like normal CVS
(port 2401) traffic.

Yoav Shapira




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and 
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This 
e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be 
saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) 
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system 
and notify the sender.  Thank you.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Documentation

2004-01-20 Thread Pete Stokes
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/

Gaurav Kadyan wrote:

Hi All,
Could some body tell me where to find documentation for -
1.Realm
2.Filter
3.Valve
4.Container
5.Connector
6.MBean
7.Pipeline
8.LifeCycle
9.Jasper
Thanks in advance,
Gaurav Kadyan
 



***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received 
this email in error please notify the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for 
the presence of computer viruses.
***
For any information on the Quinn Group of Companies please visit :-
http://www.quinn-group.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Documentation

2002-10-03 Thread Robert L Sowders

Thanks for that Mr. McClanahan,

I've already been over those pages with a fine tooth comb and managed to 
squeeze out what I was after.  The problem is just that, I had search for 
it, and I've looked at it before for other things.  There is no direct 
reference anywhere on it for submitting anything to the documentation, 
much less how to work with and compile the documentation locally, how to 
get it out of CVS, nothing. 

At the very least the how to contribute page needs to be redone to make 
it easier for everyone who has something to contribute to do it easily.  I 
guess that's where I'll start.

Once again I'll say it.  Tomcat would really benefit from a documentation 
project.  It's not rocket science, the wheel doesn't have to be invented. 
There are already good examples of documentation projects to emulate if 
not down right clone. 
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/
http://apache-server.com/tutorials/ATdocs-project.html

thanks again,

rls




Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/02/2002 09:03 AM
Please respond to Tomcat Users List

 
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:RE: Documentation



On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Robert L Sowders wrote:

 Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 22:18:48 -0700
 From: Robert L Sowders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Documentation

 I feel your pain John, frustration with poor documentation is always a 
big
 sore spot.  But let's not line them all up and shoot them just yet, ok.
 They still need to get Tomcat 5 out the door.  ,-)

 We can only hope that Tomcat-dev (who is reading this list, I hope) will
 set up some sort of method where people can at least submit changes or
 updates or something better than what we have now.

 I've received at least 10 emails off-line and around 5 or so from the
 list, of people who have things to contribute.  We want to help, the
 question is, can something be done to move to a coordinated effort and 
who
 will do it.  I submit that it must be controlled and reviewed by the
 developers themselves.  They have access to the resources, we don't, 
and,
 they are the authorities on tomcat, they have to be the reviewing
 authority.

 I know it will take no small effort to set this up but allot could be
 cloned from the good example of the Apache Documentation Project.

 So, are there any developer types lurking out there.  We got some
 documentation help for you, do ya want it?


Sure!

From the perspective of the developers, suggested changes to the
documentation (or proposed new documents) are treated exactly the same as
proposed bug fixes or enhancements to the code itself.  Therefore, the
best way to submit proposed changes is to create a bug report (or
enhancement request) in the bug tracking system:

  http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/

and then create a patch to the existing documentation files that reflects
the change you propose.  Details for how to create the diff files for
patches is available online starting at:

  http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html

The existing Tomcat documentation can be found in the
webapps/tomcat-docs subdirectory of the jakarta-tomcat-4.0 CVS
repository.  Nearly all of it is in the form of XML files that are
post-processed through an XSLT stylesheet to produce the HTML that is
ultimately included in the tomcat-docs webapp, as well as posted online:

  http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/

Changes to the menu bar on the left hand side would be made to the
webapps/tomcat-docs/project.html file.

General whines about how the documentation sucks will go to /dev/null.
Specific patches to add to (or fix) the existing documentation pages are
MUCH more likely to be effective :-).

 rls


Craig


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation

2002-10-02 Thread Kenny G. Dubuisson, Jr.

I would also like to help on the docs.  Tomcat is a technology that we are
betting our software engineering future on right now so I'll be in it for
the long haul.  I've already written a step-by-step document on how to get
Apache, Tomcat, SSL for Apache, JDBC for Oracle, Oracle 9i client, and the
Java charting library JFreeChart all installed and working on Red Hat Linux
7.3.  Though the document is extremely informal (more like me taking notes
during the install), I would not mind turning it into a HOW-TO or something.

Just let me know if I can help,
Kenny

- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:03 AM
Subject: RE: Documentation




 On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Robert L Sowders wrote:

  Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 22:18:48 -0700
  From: Robert L Sowders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: Documentation
 
  I feel your pain John, frustration with poor documentation is always a
big
  sore spot.  But let's not line them all up and shoot them just yet, ok.
  They still need to get Tomcat 5 out the door.  ,-)
 
  We can only hope that Tomcat-dev (who is reading this list, I hope) will
  set up some sort of method where people can at least submit changes or
  updates or something better than what we have now.
 
  I've received at least 10 emails off-line and around 5 or so from the
  list, of people who have things to contribute.  We want to help, the
  question is, can something be done to move to a coordinated effort and
who
  will do it.  I submit that it must be controlled and reviewed by the
  developers themselves.  They have access to the resources, we don't,
and,
  they are the authorities on tomcat, they have to be the reviewing
  authority.
 
  I know it will take no small effort to set this up but allot could be
  cloned from the good example of the Apache Documentation Project.
 
  So, are there any developer types lurking out there.  We got some
  documentation help for you, do ya want it?
 

 Sure!

 From the perspective of the developers, suggested changes to the
 documentation (or proposed new documents) are treated exactly the same as
 proposed bug fixes or enhancements to the code itself.  Therefore, the
 best way to submit proposed changes is to create a bug report (or
 enhancement request) in the bug tracking system:

   http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/

 and then create a patch to the existing documentation files that reflects
 the change you propose.  Details for how to create the diff files for
 patches is available online starting at:

   http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html

 The existing Tomcat documentation can be found in the
 webapps/tomcat-docs subdirectory of the jakarta-tomcat-4.0 CVS
 repository.  Nearly all of it is in the form of XML files that are
 post-processed through an XSLT stylesheet to produce the HTML that is
 ultimately included in the tomcat-docs webapp, as well as posted online:

   http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/

 Changes to the menu bar on the left hand side would be made to the
 webapps/tomcat-docs/project.html file.

 General whines about how the documentation sucks will go to /dev/null.
 Specific patches to add to (or fix) the existing documentation pages are
 MUCH more likely to be effective :-).

  rls
 

 Craig


 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Documentation

2002-10-02 Thread Turner, John


We're looking for a Java charting solution.  I'd be very interested in
seeing a doc on how to use JFreeChart, I've never heard of it before.

John


 -Original Message-
 From: Kenny G. Dubuisson, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:08 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Documentation
 
 
 I would also like to help on the docs.  Tomcat is a 
 technology that we are
 betting our software engineering future on right now so I'll 
 be in it for
 the long haul.  I've already written a step-by-step document 
 on how to get
 Apache, Tomcat, SSL for Apache, JDBC for Oracle, Oracle 9i 
 client, and the
 Java charting library JFreeChart all installed and working on 
 Red Hat Linux
 7.3.  Though the document is extremely informal (more like me 
 taking notes
 during the install), I would not mind turning it into a 
 HOW-TO or something.
 
 Just let me know if I can help,
 Kenny
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:03 AM
 Subject: RE: Documentation
 
 
 
 
  On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Robert L Sowders wrote:
 
   Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 22:18:48 -0700
   From: Robert L Sowders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: Documentation
  
   I feel your pain John, frustration with poor 
 documentation is always a
 big
   sore spot.  But let's not line them all up and shoot them 
 just yet, ok.
   They still need to get Tomcat 5 out the door.  ,-)
  
   We can only hope that Tomcat-dev (who is reading this 
 list, I hope) will
   set up some sort of method where people can at least 
 submit changes or
   updates or something better than what we have now.
  
   I've received at least 10 emails off-line and around 5 or 
 so from the
   list, of people who have things to contribute.  We want 
 to help, the
   question is, can something be done to move to a 
 coordinated effort and
 who
   will do it.  I submit that it must be controlled and 
 reviewed by the
   developers themselves.  They have access to the 
 resources, we don't,
 and,
   they are the authorities on tomcat, they have to be the reviewing
   authority.
  
   I know it will take no small effort to set this up but 
 allot could be
   cloned from the good example of the Apache Documentation Project.
  
   So, are there any developer types lurking out there.  We got some
   documentation help for you, do ya want it?
  
 
  Sure!
 
  From the perspective of the developers, suggested changes to the
  documentation (or proposed new documents) are treated 
 exactly the same as
  proposed bug fixes or enhancements to the code itself.  
 Therefore, the
  best way to submit proposed changes is to create a bug report (or
  enhancement request) in the bug tracking system:
 
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
 
  and then create a patch to the existing documentation files 
 that reflects
  the change you propose.  Details for how to create the 
 diff files for
  patches is available online starting at:
 
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html
 
  The existing Tomcat documentation can be found in the
  webapps/tomcat-docs subdirectory of the jakarta-tomcat-4.0 CVS
  repository.  Nearly all of it is in the form of XML files that are
  post-processed through an XSLT stylesheet to produce the 
 HTML that is
  ultimately included in the tomcat-docs webapp, as well as 
 posted online:
 
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/
 
  Changes to the menu bar on the left hand side would be made to the
  webapps/tomcat-docs/project.html file.
 
  General whines about how the documentation sucks will go to 
 /dev/null.
  Specific patches to add to (or fix) the existing 
 documentation pages are
  MUCH more likely to be effective :-).
 
   rls
  
 
  Craig
 
 
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Documentation

2002-10-02 Thread Turner, John


Thanks!

John


 -Original Message-
 From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:03 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Documentation
 
 
 
 
 On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Robert L Sowders wrote:
 
  Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 22:18:48 -0700
  From: Robert L Sowders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: Documentation
 
  I feel your pain John, frustration with poor documentation 
 is always a big
  sore spot.  But let's not line them all up and shoot them 
 just yet, ok.
  They still need to get Tomcat 5 out the door.  ,-)
 
  We can only hope that Tomcat-dev (who is reading this list, 
 I hope) will
  set up some sort of method where people can at least submit 
 changes or
  updates or something better than what we have now.
 
  I've received at least 10 emails off-line and around 5 or 
 so from the
  list, of people who have things to contribute.  We want to help, the
  question is, can something be done to move to a coordinated 
 effort and who
  will do it.  I submit that it must be controlled and reviewed by the
  developers themselves.  They have access to the resources, 
 we don't, and,
  they are the authorities on tomcat, they have to be the reviewing
  authority.
 
  I know it will take no small effort to set this up but 
 allot could be
  cloned from the good example of the Apache Documentation Project.
 
  So, are there any developer types lurking out there.  We got some
  documentation help for you, do ya want it?
 
 
 Sure!
 
 From the perspective of the developers, suggested changes to the
 documentation (or proposed new documents) are treated exactly 
 the same as
 proposed bug fixes or enhancements to the code itself.  Therefore, the
 best way to submit proposed changes is to create a bug report (or
 enhancement request) in the bug tracking system:
 
   http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
 
 and then create a patch to the existing documentation files 
 that reflects
 the change you propose.  Details for how to create the diff 
 files for
 patches is available online starting at:
 
   http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html
 
 The existing Tomcat documentation can be found in the
 webapps/tomcat-docs subdirectory of the jakarta-tomcat-4.0 CVS
 repository.  Nearly all of it is in the form of XML files that are
 post-processed through an XSLT stylesheet to produce the HTML that is
 ultimately included in the tomcat-docs webapp, as well as 
 posted online:
 
   http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/
 
 Changes to the menu bar on the left hand side would be made to the
 webapps/tomcat-docs/project.html file.
 
 General whines about how the documentation sucks will go to /dev/null.
 Specific patches to add to (or fix) the existing 
 documentation pages are
 MUCH more likely to be effective :-).
 
  rls
 
 
 Craig
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation

2002-10-02 Thread Kenny G. Dubuisson, Jr.

John:

I found JFreeChart from a post on this list and it's pretty darn good from
what I can tell.  Go to
http://www.object-refinery.com/jfreechart/index.html.  The library is free
but the documentation costs $30.  I bought the docs and am going through it
right now.

My main task is getting graphing up and going from data in an Oracle
database.  I did get graphs up and going on my own using Java's Advanced
Imaging library from Sun but JFreeChart has most of the hard work already
done.

Hope this helps,
Kenny

- Original Message -
From: Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:09 AM
Subject: RE: Documentation



 We're looking for a Java charting solution.  I'd be very interested in
 seeing a doc on how to use JFreeChart, I've never heard of it before.

 John


  -Original Message-
  From: Kenny G. Dubuisson, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:08 PM
  To: Tomcat Users List
  Subject: Re: Documentation
 
 
  I would also like to help on the docs.  Tomcat is a
  technology that we are
  betting our software engineering future on right now so I'll
  be in it for
  the long haul.  I've already written a step-by-step document
  on how to get
  Apache, Tomcat, SSL for Apache, JDBC for Oracle, Oracle 9i
  client, and the
  Java charting library JFreeChart all installed and working on
  Red Hat Linux
  7.3.  Though the document is extremely informal (more like me
  taking notes
  during the install), I would not mind turning it into a
  HOW-TO or something.
 
  Just let me know if I can help,
  Kenny
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:03 AM
  Subject: RE: Documentation
 
 
  
  
   On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Robert L Sowders wrote:
  
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 22:18:48 -0700
From: Robert L Sowders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Documentation
   
I feel your pain John, frustration with poor
  documentation is always a
  big
sore spot.  But let's not line them all up and shoot them
  just yet, ok.
They still need to get Tomcat 5 out the door.  ,-)
   
We can only hope that Tomcat-dev (who is reading this
  list, I hope) will
set up some sort of method where people can at least
  submit changes or
updates or something better than what we have now.
   
I've received at least 10 emails off-line and around 5 or
  so from the
list, of people who have things to contribute.  We want
  to help, the
question is, can something be done to move to a
  coordinated effort and
  who
will do it.  I submit that it must be controlled and
  reviewed by the
developers themselves.  They have access to the
  resources, we don't,
  and,
they are the authorities on tomcat, they have to be the reviewing
authority.
   
I know it will take no small effort to set this up but
  allot could be
cloned from the good example of the Apache Documentation Project.
   
So, are there any developer types lurking out there.  We got some
documentation help for you, do ya want it?
   
  
   Sure!
  
   From the perspective of the developers, suggested changes to the
   documentation (or proposed new documents) are treated
  exactly the same as
   proposed bug fixes or enhancements to the code itself.
  Therefore, the
   best way to submit proposed changes is to create a bug report (or
   enhancement request) in the bug tracking system:
  
 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
  
   and then create a patch to the existing documentation files
  that reflects
   the change you propose.  Details for how to create the
  diff files for
   patches is available online starting at:
  
 http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html
  
   The existing Tomcat documentation can be found in the
   webapps/tomcat-docs subdirectory of the jakarta-tomcat-4.0 CVS
   repository.  Nearly all of it is in the form of XML files that are
   post-processed through an XSLT stylesheet to produce the
  HTML that is
   ultimately included in the tomcat-docs webapp, as well as
  posted online:
  
 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/
  
   Changes to the menu bar on the left hand side would be made to the
   webapps/tomcat-docs/project.html file.
  
   General whines about how the documentation sucks will go to
  /dev/null.
   Specific patches to add to (or fix) the existing
  documentation pages are
   MUCH more likely to be effective :-).
  
rls
   
  
   Craig
  
  
   --
   To unsubscribe, e-mail:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Documentation

2002-10-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan



On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Robert L Sowders wrote:

 Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 22:18:48 -0700
 From: Robert L Sowders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Documentation

 I feel your pain John, frustration with poor documentation is always a big
 sore spot.  But let's not line them all up and shoot them just yet, ok.
 They still need to get Tomcat 5 out the door.  ,-)

 We can only hope that Tomcat-dev (who is reading this list, I hope) will
 set up some sort of method where people can at least submit changes or
 updates or something better than what we have now.

 I've received at least 10 emails off-line and around 5 or so from the
 list, of people who have things to contribute.  We want to help, the
 question is, can something be done to move to a coordinated effort and who
 will do it.  I submit that it must be controlled and reviewed by the
 developers themselves.  They have access to the resources, we don't, and,
 they are the authorities on tomcat, they have to be the reviewing
 authority.

 I know it will take no small effort to set this up but allot could be
 cloned from the good example of the Apache Documentation Project.

 So, are there any developer types lurking out there.  We got some
 documentation help for you, do ya want it?


Sure!

From the perspective of the developers, suggested changes to the
documentation (or proposed new documents) are treated exactly the same as
proposed bug fixes or enhancements to the code itself.  Therefore, the
best way to submit proposed changes is to create a bug report (or
enhancement request) in the bug tracking system:

  http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/

and then create a patch to the existing documentation files that reflects
the change you propose.  Details for how to create the diff files for
patches is available online starting at:

  http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html

The existing Tomcat documentation can be found in the
webapps/tomcat-docs subdirectory of the jakarta-tomcat-4.0 CVS
repository.  Nearly all of it is in the form of XML files that are
post-processed through an XSLT stylesheet to produce the HTML that is
ultimately included in the tomcat-docs webapp, as well as posted online:

  http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/

Changes to the menu bar on the left hand side would be made to the
webapps/tomcat-docs/project.html file.

General whines about how the documentation sucks will go to /dev/null.
Specific patches to add to (or fix) the existing documentation pages are
MUCH more likely to be effective :-).

 rls


Craig


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Documentation

2002-10-02 Thread Turner, John


Thanks!

John


 -Original Message-
 From: Kenny G. Dubuisson, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:16 PM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Documentation
 
 
 John:
 
 I found JFreeChart from a post on this list and it's pretty 
 darn good from
 what I can tell.  Go to
 http://www.object-refinery.com/jfreechart/index.html.  The 
 library is free
 but the documentation costs $30.  I bought the docs and am 
 going through it
 right now.
 
 My main task is getting graphing up and going from data in an Oracle
 database.  I did get graphs up and going on my own using 
 Java's Advanced
 Imaging library from Sun but JFreeChart has most of the hard 
 work already
 done.
 
 Hope this helps,
 Kenny
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:09 AM
 Subject: RE: Documentation
 
 
 
  We're looking for a Java charting solution.  I'd be very 
 interested in
  seeing a doc on how to use JFreeChart, I've never heard of 
 it before.
 
  John
 
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Kenny G. Dubuisson, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:08 PM
   To: Tomcat Users List
   Subject: Re: Documentation
  
  
   I would also like to help on the docs.  Tomcat is a
   technology that we are
   betting our software engineering future on right now so I'll
   be in it for
   the long haul.  I've already written a step-by-step document
   on how to get
   Apache, Tomcat, SSL for Apache, JDBC for Oracle, Oracle 9i
   client, and the
   Java charting library JFreeChart all installed and working on
   Red Hat Linux
   7.3.  Though the document is extremely informal (more like me
   taking notes
   during the install), I would not mind turning it into a
   HOW-TO or something.
  
   Just let me know if I can help,
   Kenny
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:03 AM
   Subject: RE: Documentation
  
  
   
   
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Robert L Sowders wrote:
   
 Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 22:18:48 -0700
 From: Robert L Sowders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Documentation

 I feel your pain John, frustration with poor
   documentation is always a
   big
 sore spot.  But let's not line them all up and shoot them
   just yet, ok.
 They still need to get Tomcat 5 out the door.  ,-)

 We can only hope that Tomcat-dev (who is reading this
   list, I hope) will
 set up some sort of method where people can at least
   submit changes or
 updates or something better than what we have now.

 I've received at least 10 emails off-line and around 5 or
   so from the
 list, of people who have things to contribute.  We want
   to help, the
 question is, can something be done to move to a
   coordinated effort and
   who
 will do it.  I submit that it must be controlled and
   reviewed by the
 developers themselves.  They have access to the
   resources, we don't,
   and,
 they are the authorities on tomcat, they have to be 
 the reviewing
 authority.

 I know it will take no small effort to set this up but
   allot could be
 cloned from the good example of the Apache 
 Documentation Project.

 So, are there any developer types lurking out there.  
 We got some
 documentation help for you, do ya want it?

   
Sure!
   
From the perspective of the developers, suggested 
 changes to the
documentation (or proposed new documents) are treated
   exactly the same as
proposed bug fixes or enhancements to the code itself.
   Therefore, the
best way to submit proposed changes is to create a bug 
 report (or
enhancement request) in the bug tracking system:
   
  http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
   
and then create a patch to the existing documentation files
   that reflects
the change you propose.  Details for how to create the
   diff files for
patches is available online starting at:
   
  http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html
   
The existing Tomcat documentation can be found in the
webapps/tomcat-docs subdirectory of the 
 jakarta-tomcat-4.0 CVS
repository.  Nearly all of it is in the form of XML 
 files that are
post-processed through an XSLT stylesheet to produce the
   HTML that is
ultimately included in the tomcat-docs webapp, as well as
   posted online:
   
  http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/
   
Changes to the menu bar on the left hand side would be 
 made to the
webapps/tomcat-docs/project.html file.
   
General whines about how the documentation sucks will go to
   /dev/null.
Specific patches to add to (or fix) the existing
   documentation

RE: Documentation

2002-10-02 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega

 De: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Enviado el: 1 de octubre de 2002 14:12

 they should cover.  If they did, this list wouldn't get 
 100-150 messages
 every night.

:-), Please count how many messages of this 100 or 150 are from simply
not reading ANY docs... good or bad.. 

Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation

2002-10-02 Thread Jeff Wishnie

A pretty high percentage seem to be becuase the docs really are lousy.

Wouldn't it be nice to answer 'RTFM' to most of them?

When my time frees up on this project I plan on submitting several documentation 
changes.

- Jeff

- Original Message - 
From: Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:57 PM
Subject: RE: Documentation


  De: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Enviado el: 1 de octubre de 2002 14:12
 
  they should cover.  If they did, this list wouldn't get 
  100-150 messages
  every night.
 
 :-), Please count how many messages of this 100 or 150 are from simply
 not reading ANY docs... good or bad.. 
 
 Saludos ,
 Ignacio J. Ortega
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation

2002-10-02 Thread Gustavo Vegas

I agree with Jeff. The Tomcat documentation reminds me of the old times 
when I had to compile TeX. A lot of the information for things I have 
needed to configure in my installation have come from the docs from 
version 3.3, although I am using 4.0.5. This also makes me worry that 
some of the things I am using may be deprecated.

Cheers,

-- Gustavo Vegas.

Jeff Wishnie wrote:

A pretty high percentage seem to be becuase the docs really are lousy.

Wouldn't it be nice to answer 'RTFM' to most of them?

When my time frees up on this project I plan on submitting several documentation 
changes.

- Jeff

  




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation

2002-10-02 Thread Jon Eaves

Hiya Gustavo (and others)

I'm going to disagree.  The Tomcat docs for the most part are very good.
I was able to read them and setup Tomcat to do all the normal things.
I can create different contexts, map servlets, create database pools,
custom error pages etc.  The 4.1.x documentation is updated from the 3.x
and 4.0.x documentation and I can't remember it being broken in any
real way due to bitrot.  Some of the newer features are a little terse,
but you have to expect that, then again, there aren't that many How do
I configure and create Filters type questions.

I haven't tried to use mod_jk yet, but there seems to be a lot of questions
about that, but I suspect it's because people haven't read that
documentation to start with.

Frankly, my rule of mailing lists are that people would rather ask a
question because they are too lazy to find the answer themselves.  Most
of the questions that are asked do exist in the Tomcat documentation, and
those that aren't there have generally been answered very clearly by
list members.  The list is searchable, and Google (www.google.com) is
_always_ your friend.

This list is certainly one of the most friendly and helpful that I've been
on.  Sadly that tends to be to it's detriment as people abuse that help.

There are definitely areas of the documentation that need work, and
potentially others that need cleaning up, but in general they are pretty
damn good.

Cheers,
-- jon

Gustavo Vegas wrote:
 I agree with Jeff. The Tomcat documentation reminds me of the old times 
 when I had to compile TeX. A lot of the information for things I have 
 needed to configure in my installation have come from the docs from 
 version 3.3, although I am using 4.0.5. This also makes me worry that 
 some of the things I am using may be deprecated.
 
 Cheers,
 
 -- Gustavo Vegas.
 
 Jeff Wishnie wrote:
 
 A pretty high percentage seem to be becuase the docs really are lousy.

 Wouldn't it be nice to answer 'RTFM' to most of them?

 When my time frees up on this project I plan on submitting several 
 documentation changes.

 - Jeff


-- 
Jon Eaves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.eaves.org/jon/


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Documentation

2002-10-01 Thread Turner, John


 -Original Message-
 From: Glenn Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:18 PM
 
 I would tend to agree with the above, those writing the code 
 either don't
 have the inclination or time to write up good documentation.

In my mind, these developers should be shot.  Or at least confined to a tiny
little box for an extended period of time.  Or maybe just put in charge of a
large data center running their software, and their email and cell phones
the only contact info on the 24/7/365 call list.  Not to rant, but any
developer, open source or not, that writes code but fails to provide good or
better documentation at the same time is a poor developer, regardless of
their technical skill, and regardless of their commitment or uncompensated
participation.  I'm no developer, but even I know that documentation is
key...I probably spend 60% of my sys-admin time writing recipes and docs for
other people to descibe what and how I did the things I did in the other
40%. 

I think that the argument that the developers don't have time is a
cop-out, especially under the Apache style of development and release
schedules.  There's no pressure to meet release dates in that mode of
development, so time is technically unlimited.  I would say it's more don't
have the inclination because documentation isn't as cool as code and my ego
gets more of a boost from writing the latest whiz-bang feature or finding a
bug in some other guy's code than it does writing a doc that explains how to
perform an installation.  Which is a shame.

Besides, isn't Java self-documenting? ;)

 Have you looked at the latest docs for Tomcat 4.1?  Much 
 better jk documentation,
 existing docs updated, and even some new documents at:
 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/index.html
 

I've been all through them, they're pretty much just a rehash of 4.0 docs
with a new design template.  The new design is pretty, granted, but that's a
far cry from where the docs should be.  The connector docs are a little
better, but in my opinion they don't cover nearly the amount of information
they should cover.  If they did, this list wouldn't get 100-150 messages
every night.

That said, I would gladly participate in any documentation project that is
started.  I could contribute several hours ( 3  time  10 ) each week.

 
 Glenn
 

John


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation

2002-10-01 Thread Thad Humphries

I'll throw in what I can.  Most of my TC docs consist of URLs and
hardcopy that I've collected here and there from the web, along with my
notes.  Put me on your list...

If nothing else, it will help me to learn more aobut Tomcat...

On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 17:01, Robert L Sowders wrote:
 Since most of the questions to tomcat-users list concern installation and 
 configuration issues it demonstrates that there is a real need for Tomcat 
 to have a documentation project that it's users can contribute to. Right 
 now most of the documentation consists of the xdocs which are pretty good, 
 but can be so much more.  The developers obviously have little time to 
 maintain the present documentation and there is such an apparent need that 
 I wonder why a project for the documentation has not been started.
 
 There are many doc-projects out there to emulate.  I especially like the 
 one that the apache folks have running, the new xml documentation for 
 Apache 2.0 is probably the best I've seen. 
 
 I'm sure that many people would be willing to devote some time to 
 organizing and maintaining input from the community into a resource that 
 would benefit everyone.  I for one would be willing to contribute, but 
 right now there is nothing an nowhere to submit to.
 
 Should the developers of Tomcat initiate a project for the documentation? 
 Or should we?  The Apache folks seem to have solved this issue, it remains 
 to be solved for Tomcat.
  
 Have a look at some examples of opensouce projects which have solved their 
 documentation problems:
 
 http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/
 http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/
 http://www.debian.org/doc/ddp
 http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gdp/
 http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dsssldoc/index.html
 http://pm-doc.sourceforge.net/
 http://zdp.zope.org/
 http://www.tldp.org/
 
 rls
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
-- 

Thad Humphries  ...no religious test shall ever be required
Web Development Manager  as a qualification to any office or public
Phone: 540/675-3015, x225trust under the United States. -Article VI


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation

2002-10-01 Thread peter lin


I'm still cleaning up my old document on configuring
servletcontextlistener, and servlets, but I'd like to help also.  I also
think documentation is critical and would like to assist in that effort.

peter lin


Turner, John wrote:
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Glenn Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:18 PM
 
  I would tend to agree with the above, those writing the code
  either don't
  have the inclination or time to write up good documentation.
 
 In my mind, these developers should be shot.  Or at least confined to a tiny
 little box for an extended period of time.  Or maybe just put in charge of a
 large data center running their software, and their email and cell phones
 the only contact info on the 24/7/365 call list.  Not to rant, but any
 developer, open source or not, that writes code but fails to provide good or
 better documentation at the same time is a poor developer, regardless of
 their technical skill, and regardless of their commitment or uncompensated
 participation.  I'm no developer, but even I know that documentation is
 key...I probably spend 60% of my sys-admin time writing recipes and docs for
 other people to descibe what and how I did the things I did in the other
 40%.
 
 I think that the argument that the developers don't have time is a
 cop-out, especially under the Apache style of development and release
 schedules.  There's no pressure to meet release dates in that mode of
 development, so time is technically unlimited.  I would say it's more don't
 have the inclination because documentation isn't as cool as code and my ego
 gets more of a boost from writing the latest whiz-bang feature or finding a
 bug in some other guy's code than it does writing a doc that explains how to
 perform an installation.  Which is a shame.
 
 Besides, isn't Java self-documenting? ;)
 
  Have you looked at the latest docs for Tomcat 4.1?  Much
  better jk documentation,
  existing docs updated, and even some new documents at:
 
  http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/index.html
 
 
 I've been all through them, they're pretty much just a rehash of 4.0 docs
 with a new design template.  The new design is pretty, granted, but that's a
 far cry from where the docs should be.  The connector docs are a little
 better, but in my opinion they don't cover nearly the amount of information
 they should cover.  If they did, this list wouldn't get 100-150 messages
 every night.
 
 That said, I would gladly participate in any documentation project that is
 started.  I could contribute several hours ( 3  time  10 ) each week.
 
 
  Glenn
 
 
 John
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Documentation

2002-10-01 Thread Anthony Milbourne

Hi

-1 for shooting developers :-)

I can see your point John, but in the real world people are slack and miss
bits.  Also, as has been pointed out, writing technical notes for technical
people is a very different skill to writing a user manual for lay-people.  I
would rather have the best developers doing the development and the best
authors writing the docs.  Also a lot of minor patches and fixes are
submitted by people other than the core developers - often without updates
to the docs (if they are needed).

I think the doc project is a good idea.  I don't feel I know enough about
Tomcat to contribute source (I doubt they would take it :-), but I do feel I
have used Tomcat enough to comment on, and maybe even contribute, docs.

I am certainly willing to contribute to a project - although I suspect there
are people more qualified who have already volunteered.

Anthony.

 -Original Message-
 From: Turner, John [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 01 October 2002 13:12
 To:   'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject:  RE: Documentation
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Glenn Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:18 PM
  
  I would tend to agree with the above, those writing the code 
  either don't
  have the inclination or time to write up good documentation.
 
 In my mind, these developers should be shot.  Or at least confined to a
 tiny
 little box for an extended period of time.  Or maybe just put in charge of
 a
 large data center running their software, and their email and cell phones
 the only contact info on the 24/7/365 call list.  Not to rant, but any
 developer, open source or not, that writes code but fails to provide good
 or
 better documentation at the same time is a poor developer, regardless of
 their technical skill, and regardless of their commitment or uncompensated
 participation.  I'm no developer, but even I know that documentation is
 key...I probably spend 60% of my sys-admin time writing recipes and docs
 for
 other people to descibe what and how I did the things I did in the other
 40%. 
 
 I think that the argument that the developers don't have time is a
 cop-out, especially under the Apache style of development and release
 schedules.  There's no pressure to meet release dates in that mode of
 development, so time is technically unlimited.  I would say it's more
 don't
 have the inclination because documentation isn't as cool as code and my
 ego
 gets more of a boost from writing the latest whiz-bang feature or finding
 a
 bug in some other guy's code than it does writing a doc that explains how
 to
 perform an installation.  Which is a shame.
 
 Besides, isn't Java self-documenting? ;)
 
  Have you looked at the latest docs for Tomcat 4.1?  Much 
  better jk documentation,
  existing docs updated, and even some new documents at:
  
  http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/index.html
  
 
 I've been all through them, they're pretty much just a rehash of 4.0 docs
 with a new design template.  The new design is pretty, granted, but that's
 a
 far cry from where the docs should be.  The connector docs are a little
 better, but in my opinion they don't cover nearly the amount of
 information
 they should cover.  If they did, this list wouldn't get 100-150 messages
 every night.
 
 That said, I would gladly participate in any documentation project that is
 started.  I could contribute several hours ( 3  time  10 ) each week.
 
 


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Documentation

2002-10-01 Thread Bruce Williams



 -Original Message-
 From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 8:12 AM
 To: 'Tomcat Users List'
 Subject: RE: Documentation



  -Original Message-
  From: Glenn Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:18 PM
 
  I would tend to agree with the above, those writing the code
  either don't
  have the inclination or time to write up good documentation.

 In my mind, these developers should be shot.  Or at least
 confined to a tiny
 little box for an extended period of time.  Or maybe just put
 in charge of a
 large data center running their software, and their email and
 cell phones
 the only contact info on the 24/7/365 call list.  Not to rant, but any
 developer, open source or not, that writes code but fails to
 provide good or
 better documentation at the same time is a poor developer,
 regardless of
 their technical skill, and regardless of their commitment or
 uncompensated
 participation.  I'm no developer, but even I know that
 documentation is
 key...I probably spend 60% of my sys-admin time writing
 recipes and docs for
 other people to descibe what and how I did the things I did
 in the other
 40%.

There is a big difference between writing policy and administrative doc,
and writing product documentation on a product that has a short release
cycle. I suppose you could have yearly releases with more polished
documentation, but the world is just moving faster than that so lighten
up? :-)

Bye,
Bruce Williams
 A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a
simple system that worked.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[OFF TOPIC] RE: Documentation

2002-10-01 Thread Turner, John



 -Original Message-
 From: Bruce Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:56 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Documentation
 
 There is a big difference between writing policy and 
 administrative doc,
 and writing product documentation on a product that has a 
 short release
 cycle. I suppose you could have yearly releases with more polished
 documentation, but the world is just moving faster than that 
 so lighten
 up? :-)

As I pointed out, there is no release cycle in the Apache mode, and there is
no release cycle in open source.  You release when you feel the product is
ready for release, and no sooner.  You're also under no threat of liability
for providing something sub-standard, so there is no incentive to do so
other than laziness or a desire to be the first with the coolest instead
of second with the best.  No time is an invalid and illogical
argument...open source developers have nothing but time.  Maybe I'm in the
minority, but on the rare occasions I get to write applications, I'm much
more satisfied taking an extra day or week and delivering 100% of the
package instead of skipping that extra day or week and delivering 70%.

It's a very simple matter to include good documentation as a criteria for
judging when something should be released.  Problem solved.  The problem
users of open source experience is that a large portion of open source
developers typically use it works, there's no docs, but what do they expect
for free? as a release criteria.  Let's face it...many open source
developers get a kick out of saying my app had a certain feature before the
app from some-big-company instead of getting a kick out of I delivered the
best damn application package anyone has ever seen.  some-big-company
typically equals Microsoft, IBM, or Oracle.

Regarding my own docs, I can assure you they're not policy and
administrative docs.  Quite the opposite, and in my opinion a recipe for
building and deploying a production server, performing a security lock down
procdure, or any number of other procedures and processes, is usually much
more comprehensive than a document that says this function does X and takes
these 3 parameters as arguments.  There's a difference between an
explanatory document and a step-by-step guide for implementing a solution.

I'm not knocking open source developers themselves, only their tendency to
avoid providing comprehensive documentation at the same time as providing
the application they developed.  I honestly can't think of a single logical
argument to support not releasing acceptable documentation.  What good is
spending your own time and effort for free to produce something for people
to use if they don't know how to use it and you won't tell them?  It makes
much more sense to have as big a user-base as you can possibly have, and it
gives you a much better return on your time and effort.  One of the best
ways to increase your user-base is not to decrease (or eliminate) the price,
but to help more people understand how to use what you gave them or what is
available to them.

John



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Documentation

2002-10-01 Thread Robert L Sowders

I feel your pain John, frustration with poor documentation is always a big 
sore spot.  But let's not line them all up and shoot them just yet, ok. 
They still need to get Tomcat 5 out the door.  ,-)

We can only hope that Tomcat-dev (who is reading this list, I hope) will 
set up some sort of method where people can at least submit changes or 
updates or something better than what we have now. 

I've received at least 10 emails off-line and around 5 or so from the 
list, of people who have things to contribute.  We want to help, the 
question is, can something be done to move to a coordinated effort and who 
will do it.  I submit that it must be controlled and reviewed by the 
developers themselves.  They have access to the resources, we don't, and, 
they are the authorities on tomcat, they have to be the reviewing 
authority.

I know it will take no small effort to set this up but allot could be 
cloned from the good example of the Apache Documentation Project.

So, are there any developer types lurking out there.  We got some 
documentation help for you, do ya want it? 

rls





Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/01/2002 05:11 AM
Please respond to Tomcat Users List

 
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:RE: Documentation


 -Original Message-
 From: Glenn Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:18 PM
 
 I would tend to agree with the above, those writing the code 
 either don't
 have the inclination or time to write up good documentation.

In my mind, these developers should be shot.  Or at least confined to a 
tiny
little box for an extended period of time.  Or maybe just put in charge of 
a
large data center running their software, and their email and cell phones
the only contact info on the 24/7/365 call list.  Not to rant, but any
developer, open source or not, that writes code but fails to provide good 
or
better documentation at the same time is a poor developer, regardless of
their technical skill, and regardless of their commitment or uncompensated
participation.  I'm no developer, but even I know that documentation is
key...I probably spend 60% of my sys-admin time writing recipes and docs 
for
other people to descibe what and how I did the things I did in the other
40%. 

I think that the argument that the developers don't have time is a
cop-out, especially under the Apache style of development and release
schedules.  There's no pressure to meet release dates in that mode of
development, so time is technically unlimited.  I would say it's more 
don't
have the inclination because documentation isn't as cool as code and my 
ego
gets more of a boost from writing the latest whiz-bang feature or finding 
a
bug in some other guy's code than it does writing a doc that explains how 
to
perform an installation.  Which is a shame.

Besides, isn't Java self-documenting? ;)

 Have you looked at the latest docs for Tomcat 4.1?  Much 
 better jk documentation,
 existing docs updated, and even some new documents at:
 
 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/index.html
 

I've been all through them, they're pretty much just a rehash of 4.0 docs
with a new design template.  The new design is pretty, granted, but that's 
a
far cry from where the docs should be.  The connector docs are a little
better, but in my opinion they don't cover nearly the amount of 
information
they should cover.  If they did, this list wouldn't get 100-150 messages
every night.

That said, I would gladly participate in any documentation project that is
started.  I could contribute several hours ( 3  time  10 ) each week.

 
 Glenn
 

John


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Documentation

2002-09-30 Thread Bryant, William

Great idea.  It has been attempted before, in the form of the Hitch-hiker's
Guide to Tomcat, http://sourceforge.net/projects/tomcatbook.   That project
is essentially dead, however.  I completely agree with you that something
like this would be a wonderful asset to the Tomcat community.

... Mike



-Original Message-
From: Robert L Sowders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:01 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Documentation


Since most of the questions to tomcat-users list concern installation and 
configuration issues it demonstrates that there is a real need for Tomcat 
to have a documentation project that it's users can contribute to. Right 
now most of the documentation consists of the xdocs which are pretty good, 
but can be so much more.  The developers obviously have little time to 
maintain the present documentation and there is such an apparent need that 
I wonder why a project for the documentation has not been started.

There are many doc-projects out there to emulate.  I especially like the 
one that the apache folks have running, the new xml documentation for 
Apache 2.0 is probably the best I've seen. 

I'm sure that many people would be willing to devote some time to 
organizing and maintaining input from the community into a resource that 
would benefit everyone.  I for one would be willing to contribute, but 
right now there is nothing an nowhere to submit to.

Should the developers of Tomcat initiate a project for the documentation? 
Or should we?  The Apache folks seem to have solved this issue, it remains 
to be solved for Tomcat.
 
Have a look at some examples of opensouce projects which have solved their 
documentation problems:

http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/
http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/
http://www.debian.org/doc/ddp http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gdp/
http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dsssldoc/index.html
http://pm-doc.sourceforge.net/
http://zdp.zope.org/
http://www.tldp.org/

rls

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation

2002-09-30 Thread Glenn Nielsen

Robert L Sowders wrote:
 Since most of the questions to tomcat-users list concern installation and 
 configuration issues it demonstrates that there is a real need for Tomcat 
 to have a documentation project that it's users can contribute to. Right 
 now most of the documentation consists of the xdocs which are pretty good, 
 but can be so much more.  The developers obviously have little time to 
 maintain the present documentation and there is such an apparent need that 
 I wonder why a project for the documentation has not been started.
 

I would tend to agree with the above, those writing the code either don't
have the inclination or time to write up good documentation.

Have you looked at the latest docs for Tomcat 4.1?  Much better jk documentation,
existing docs updated, and even some new documents at:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/index.html

Regards,

Glenn


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation

2002-09-30 Thread TOMITA_ALEX_NONLILLY

It would be great to have a website with all the documentation and I 
would love to help building this website...

regards,
Alex






Robert L Sowders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
30/09/2002 04:01 p.m.
Please respond to Tomcat Users List

 
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Documentation


Since most of the questions to tomcat-users list concern installation and 
configuration issues it demonstrates that there is a real need for Tomcat 
to have a documentation project that it's users can contribute to. Right 

now most of the documentation consists of the xdocs which are pretty good, 

but can be so much more.  The developers obviously have little time to 
maintain the present documentation and there is such an apparent need that 

I wonder why a project for the documentation has not been started.

There are many doc-projects out there to emulate.  I especially like the 

one that the apache folks have running, the new xml documentation for 
Apache 2.0 is probably the best I've seen. 

I'm sure that many people would be willing to devote some time to 
organizing and maintaining input from the community into a resource that 
would benefit everyone.  I for one would be willing to contribute, but 
right now there is nothing an nowhere to submit to.

Should the developers of Tomcat initiate a project for the documentation? 
Or should we?  The Apache folks seem to have solved this issue, it remains 

to be solved for Tomcat.
 
Have a look at some examples of opensouce projects which have solved their 

documentation problems:

http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/
http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/
http://www.debian.org/doc/ddp
http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gdp/
http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dsssldoc/index.html
http://pm-doc.sourceforge.net/
http://zdp.zope.org/
http://www.tldp.org/

rls

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation

2002-09-30 Thread Robert L Sowders

Yes, I've seen the new docs, and it looks like they're making an good 
effort there.  The trouble comes with trying to maintain them.  By that I 
mean, when new features are added to Tomcat the docs should reflect them. 
I don't expect developers to be expert at technical writing, that is 
another career field all in itself.  When documentation becomes stale or 
is not clear to most you have a problem that requires time to correct.

Complicated opensource products require that developers spend more and 
more time with just developing.  Tomcat has reached the plateau where it 
is just not cost effective for the developers to maintain the 
documentation any longer.  Their time is better spent developing the code, 
and informing a documentation effort of the new procedures, configuration, 
or capability.  The documentation project then takes care of all the nit 
picking details required of a good documentation project.   The issues of 
DTD's, CSS, style, third person vs 1st, formal vs informal, and language 
translation, to name of few, are coordinated by the project to come up 
with a coherent body of knowledge that mirrors the project itself. 

Right now if you want to learn the inner workings of Tomcat you have to 
read the source, pick up clues from various good hearted souls around the 
net, experiment through trial and error, make buddies with someone who's 
done it for years, or pay for instructions. 

For a documentation project to get off the ground the developers have to 
push for it.  They have to be in control of it.  Resources for it have to 
be allocated. (CVS)  A single point of authority has to be instituted, an 
authoritive reference (website) has to initiated, a peer review has to be 
established.  After all this is done then How To's, FAQ's, basic 
explanations of terms, procedures, and advise, all from one authoritive 
source will go a long way toward clearing the air and removing the voodoo 
from Tomcat. 

One of the big reasons for why commercial outfits tend to go with a 
commercial container is because of the technical climate surrounding the 
installation, configuration, and maintenance of Tomcat.  If this was 
simplified or if there was one dependable point of reference that answers 
could easily be drawn from, it would remove one of the biggest bullets 
from the gun that decision makers use to shoot down the use of Tomcat. 
When was the last time that you heard of Apache being disregarded as a 
viable alternative because it was too hard to install, configure or 
maintain?  I submit that one of the biggest reasons that Apache enjoys the 
percentage of internet installs that it does is because of it's ease of 
access to clearly understood documentation. 

Ok, ok, I know, I'm long winded, so I'll shut up now.

I'm really just saying that it's time for it to happen with Tomcat.  I'm 
willing to contribute toward it, I'm sure others will too. 

rls
 




Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/30/2002 03:18 PM
Please respond to Tomcat Users List

 
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Re: Documentation

Robert L Sowders wrote:
 Since most of the questions to tomcat-users list concern installation 
and 
 configuration issues it demonstrates that there is a real need for 
Tomcat 
 to have a documentation project that it's users can contribute to. 
Right 
 now most of the documentation consists of the xdocs which are pretty 
good, 
 but can be so much more.  The developers obviously have little time to 
 maintain the present documentation and there is such an apparent need 
that 
 I wonder why a project for the documentation has not been started.
 

I would tend to agree with the above, those writing the code either don't
have the inclination or time to write up good documentation.

Have you looked at the latest docs for Tomcat 4.1?  Much better jk 
documentation,
existing docs updated, and even some new documents at:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/index.html

Regards,

Glenn


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: documentation on mod_jk

2002-07-12 Thread Nikolas A. Rathert

Ukiah,
there are several places where you could find information. The most 
detailed one could be found here:

http://atlassw1.phy.bnl.gov/jakarta-tomcat/mod_jk-howto.html

If there still are questions go to

http://www.galatea.com/flashguides/index

Cheers and good luck,

Nick

Ukiah Smith wrote:
 I am looking for a how-to or other documentation on configuring
 mod_jk. I have installed it, and it serves the basic dynamic pages
 from tomcat. I want information that explains how to configure so that
 I can create my own custom configs instead of copying the examples
 without really understanding them.
 
 thanks //Ukiah Smith
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-- 
Nikolas A. Rathert
Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics
e-Learning  Knowledge Management

Fraunhoferstrasse 5
D-64283 Darmstadt
Germany
Fon +49 6151 155 552
Fax +49 6151 155 569
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.igd.fhg.de


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: documentation location

2002-04-22 Thread Me

Google is your friend!

http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.2.1/techdocs/api/javax/mail/package-summary.h
tml


EG

- Original Message -
From: Øyvind Vestavik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:36 PM
Subject: documentation location



Where can i find javadoc for this package??
package javax.mail.*

Øyvind

Øyvind Vestavik
Øvre Møllenberggt 44b
7014 Trondheim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
41422911




--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation - Class Loader Info

2002-01-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan



On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:36:12 -0500
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Documentation - Class Loader Info


 All,

 My apologies if this email is not appropriate for this list.  While going
 through the documentation for configuring Tomcat 4.0.1, I came across a couple
 of discrepancies:

 In the document for Class Loader Info, I noticed that under Class Loader
 Definitions - System section mentions the CLASSPATH environment variable is
 initialized using two jars, namely $CATALINA_HOME/lib/bootstrap.jar and
 $JAVA_HOME/lib/tools.jar.  On the standard installation of Tomcat 4.0.1, the
 bootstrap.jar file is present in the $CATALINA_HOME/bin directory rather than
 the $CATALINA_HOME/lib directory.

 I presume this was probably an oversight.  If this was not the case then perhaps
 do we need to copy the file from the $CATALINA_HOME/bin directory to the
 $CATALINA_HOME/lib directory.


Nope ... that is typo in the docs.  The files are in the right place.


 The other is also in the same document in the section discussing the order in
 which the class or resource loader looks for the various classes.
 $CATALINA_HOME/common/classes or $CATALINA_HOME/common do not contain any jar
 files, but the jars are present in $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib.  I was wondering
 if we need to copy all the files from the $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib directory to
 either the $CATALINA_HOME/common/classes directory or to the
 $CATALINA_HOME/common directory.


That's another typo -- that entry should really be:

  $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib/*.jar

 I found this out when I was trying to compile the HelloWorld servlet example
 and kept on getting the class not found error again and again.

 Any pointers on this will be helpful.

 Thanks in advance,

 Samarth


I will check in the documentation fixes today.  Thanks!

Craig


--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation for VM crash under Linux

2001-12-06 Thread Weiqi Gao

On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 04:55, Renato wrote:
 
 I saw people telling about documentation of VM crashes under Linux and that 
 there are some workarounds on the release notes. It doesn't seem to be 
 there. Could anyone point me out where I could find this docs ?

The release notes are available from the J2SE download page.  For J2SE
1.3.1_01, it's at http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/relnotes.html.  The
Vertual Machine section mentions several problems with various
versions of Linux.

-- 
Weiqi Gao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation for VM crash under Linux

2001-12-06 Thread Renato

Thanks !!


What about IBM's ? Any issues we shold be aware of ?


 On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 04:55, Renato wrote:
  
  I saw people telling about documentation of VM crashes under Linux and 
that 
  there are some workarounds on the release notes. It doesn't seem to be 
  there. Could anyone point me out where I could find this docs ?
 
 The release notes are available from the J2SE download page.  For J2SE
 1.3.1_01, it's at http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/relnotes.html.  The
 Vertual Machine section mentions several problems with various
 versions of Linux.
 
 -- 
 Weiqi Gao
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 

--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Documentation for Tomcat 4.0

2001-07-27 Thread Barry Draper

Steven-
I am running Tomcat 3.2.1, so I don't know if this will be true for 
Tomcat 4.x. I would expect it to be true, though.
The Tomcat user guide describes server.xml, web.xml and user.xml.
Find it in
TOMCAT_HOME\doc\uguide\tomcat_ug.html
where TOMCAT_HOME is the Tomcat top-level installation directory.

Example:
E:\Jakarta\jakarta-tomcat-3.2.1\doc\uguide\tomcat_ug.html

I don't think it's accessible via links from the Tomcat server home page.
You have to explicitly enter the URL or open the file from your browser
through the File/Open browser menu item.

Barry Draper
IBM Informix
Oakland, CA

-Original Message-
From: Steven Elliott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 8:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Documentation for Tomcat 4.0


I have gone over the server.xml.
I have gone over the web.xml.
I have gone over the user.xml.

I have been through both the Developer and Developing Applications With
Tomcat documentation.

Unless I've missed some documentation somewhere I've gone over all of it at
least once if not at least twice.  Nowhere did I come across the Alias /
XML tag for the server.xml but I did find it mentioned in the email archives
as I was searching for Virtual Host information.

Please if someone could point me in the direction of where I might find the
documentation for the server, user and web xml files (Tomcat v.4) I would
really, really appreciate it.

TIA

Steven Elliott   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Integrator
Interactive Tecnologia, Lda.
LisbonPortugal

tel: +351 21 440 8090
fax: +351 21 441 7242
-- 




Re: Documentation for Tomcat 4.0

2001-07-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan

On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Steven Elliott wrote:

 I have gone over the server.xml.
 I have gone over the web.xml.
 I have gone over the user.xml.
 
 I have been through both the Developer and Developing Applications With
 Tomcat documentation.
 
 Unless I've missed some documentation somewhere I've gone over all of it at
 least once if not at least twice.  Nowhere did I come across the Alias /
 XML tag for the server.xml but I did find it mentioned in the email archives
 as I was searching for Virtual Host information.
 

The server.xml docs are not 100% complete yet, but this one is in fact
mentioned.  Start up Tomcat, and browse to:

  http://localhost:8080/docs/config/index.html

and select the Host element in the navigation menu.  Down near the
bottom (in the Special Features section), you will find documentation on
Host Name Aliases, which covers the nested Alias element.

(From the Tomcat default home page, follow the General Tomcat User
Documentation link, followed by Server Configuration).

 Please if someone could point me in the direction of where I might find the
 documentation for the server, user and web xml files (Tomcat v.4) I would
 really, really appreciate it.
 

For server.xml stuff, see the link above.  For web.xml, that is defined in
the Servlet Specification, which you can download from:

  http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/download.html

Tomcat 4 conforms to the most recent Proposed Final Draft of the Servlet
2.3 and JSP 1.2 specifications.

 TIA
 
 Steven Elliott   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Systems Integrator
 Interactive Tecnologia, Lda.
 LisbonPortugal
 
 tel: +351 21 440 8090
 fax: +351 21 441 7242
 -- 
 
 
 
Craig McClanahan






RE: documentation about cvs

2001-03-09 Thread Winters, Jason

http://www.cvshome.org/docs/index.html

Jason

-Original Message-
From: Pedro Henrique Ponchio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 3:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: documentation about cvs


Please, anyone can send me an url about CVS documentation?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: documentation about cvs

2001-03-09 Thread Weining Qi

http://www.cvshome.org/docs/manual/index.html

- Original Message - 
From: "Pedro Henrique Ponchio" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 9:45 PM
Subject: documentation about cvs


Please, anyone can send me an url about CVS documentation?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation for web.xml, server.xml updated

2001-03-09 Thread Mike Slinn

I've re-uploaded the javadocs.  FTP burped last time, I guess it missed a
bunch of files.  That has been corrected.

I'm adding examples now.

Mike


Very, very nice!!!  That's a lot of good stuff in one place.

One note however, in clicking around the 3.2.x internal Javadocs, I got
a number of 404 not found errors.

-- Rob

--On Thursday, March 08, 2001 02:29:16 PM -0800 Mike Slinn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've put more time into the Tomcat documentation at
 http://www.mslinn.com/sites/tomcat

 Any comments and suggestions would be appreciated.

 Mike Slinn


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Documentation for web.xml, server.xml updated

2001-03-08 Thread mikhail malamud

Looks like a great job. Adding some examples would make it perfect.

-Original Message-
From: Mike Slinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 5:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Documentation for web.xml, server.xml updated


I've put more time into the Tomcat documentation at
http://www.mslinn.com/sites/tomcat

Any comments and suggestions would be appreciated.

Mike Slinn


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Documentation for web.xml, server.xml updated

2001-03-08 Thread Rob Tanner

Very, very nice!!!  That's a lot of good stuff in one place.

One note however, in clicking around the 3.2.x internal Javadocs, I got 
a number of 404 not found errors.

-- Rob


--On Thursday, March 08, 2001 02:29:16 PM -0800 Mike Slinn 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've put more time into the Tomcat documentation at
 http://www.mslinn.com/sites/tomcat

 Any comments and suggestions would be appreciated.

 Mike Slinn


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





   _ _ _ _   __ _ _ _ _
  /\_\_\_\_\/\_\ /\_\_\_\_\_\
 /\/_/_/_/_/   /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/  QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT,
/\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/  PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
   /\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\  /\/_//\/_/
  /\/_/ \/_/  /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin
  \/_/  \/_/  \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/  appears profound)

  Rob Tanner
  McMinnville, Oregon
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: documentation for jk_nt_service.exe

2000-12-11 Thread Susmitha Vuyyuru



Hi 
Betty,

Link to 
jk_nt_service.exe documentation:

http://jakarta.apache.org/cvsweb/index.cgi/jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/NT-Service-howto.html
and select the 
hyperlinkRevision 1.2/ (as text)

-- 
Susmitha 
Vuyyuru 
Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
1.650.314.0936
Portal Wave, Inc.The Fastest Track to 
Integrated e-Businesswww.portalwave.com 

  -Original Message-From: Betty Chang 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 10:52 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
  documentation for jk_nt_service.exe
  Hi -- where in the apache.org site is the documentation for 
  how to use jk_nt_service.exe?
  
  Thanks
  


Re: documentation for jk_nt_service.exe

2000-12-09 Thread Yong Boone



http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/NT-Service-howto.html

try this site


Re: documentation for jk_nt_service.exe

2000-12-08 Thread Kazuhiro Sakai
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/NT-Service-howto.html

It's a bit difficult to find the documentation for Tomcat on apache.org...

At 22:52 00/12/08 -0800, you wrote:
Hi -- where in the apache.org site is the documentation for how to use 
jk_nt_service.exe?

Thanks