One of the problems i've run into with open source servers on
Windows is
getting binaries for many of the common tools, servers and
dlls required
for Win32, such as connectors for Tomcat, OpenSSL for SSL on
Apache, etc.
snip
If you can complile the binaries yourself, your OK.. but
with this topic I guess...
Mvgr,
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Cressatti, Dominique [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 18:31
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: IIS or Apache
Ever heard of managers ;)
yes and what do they pay you for?
tell you how to do your job
Apache definetly has all of the features mentioned below, and one very
important one that you did not mention, Security! Apache has had a much
better security record than IIS has, and considering that there is a
larger installation base of Apache than IIS (www.netcraft.com) , that
says a lot.
From stability/bugs/security point of view the choice is easy,
use apache.
Why on earth anyone would run IIS? given it track record (code red, nimba, etc...).
apache is portable, try to replicate a config on another platform using IIS,
even on another MS platform it's not that easy.
With Apache
Ever heard of managers ;)
-Original Message-
From: Cressatti, Dominique [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 18:08
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: IIS or Apache
From stability/bugs/security point of view the choice is easy,
use apache.
Why on earth
or Apache
Ever heard of managers ;)
-Original Message-
From: Cressatti, Dominique [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 18:08
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: IIS or Apache
From stability/bugs/security point of view the choice is easy,
use apache.
Why on earth
Hi all,
We have a problem with segmentation fault when running tomcat using the WARP
Connector / Provider.
It is Working fine as standalone.
We have apache 1.3.22 and tomcat 4.0.1 installed on Solaris 8 with JDK
1.3.1_02
The following is what we get when requesting the host/examples/.
List
Subject: RE: IIS or Apache
Ever heard of managers ;)
yes and what do they pay you for?
tell you how to do your job or letting
you do your job ie finding the best web server.
If he willing to put his butt on the line for
deploying the worth web server and take full
One of the problems i've run into with open source servers on Windows is
getting binaries for many of the common tools, servers and dlls required
for Win32, such as connectors for Tomcat, OpenSSL for SSL on Apache, etc.
We don't have Visual Studio here, which i'm finding is quite important
if
statement has
made me think... Please elaborate your point.
Sumit.
-Original Message-
From: Randy Layman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: IIS or Apache
Not that I necessarily believe that IIS is the best choice
]
Subject: RE: IIS or Apache
Randy Can you please give me some data / info in support of
your statement.
Because I am using Apache right now. It just occured to me
that, 'Does IIS
fit better on windows than Apache ?' and i posted the
question. Before your
reply I thought i was doing
You need to have them listen on different ports. The default for http is
port 80. I know that this is selectable for apache. I have no idea about
IIS.
- Original Message -
From: "Joar Vatnaland" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 8:51 AM
Subject: IIS
Your web server uses port 80 to serve pages as default, so when you type in
http://localhost/ it is the same as typing in http://localhost:80.
You cannot run any two servers on the same port so you must choose another
port to run one of the servers on.
Here is an example that will get them both
Have them listening on different ports.
You can change the port for IIS via the MMC (Microsoft Management Console).
And you can change the port for Apache in the httpd.conf file in the conf
directory.
Anuj.
Joar Vatnaland wrote:
I installed Apache on my Win2000 machine, which also
has
14 matches
Mail list logo
