On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Nick Sharples wrote:
Shapira, Yoav writes:
Hi,
I don't know the direct answer to your question.
But I'm curious as to the use-case that's requiring you to subclass
HttpSession. As opposed to, for example, binding your (Serializable)
objects to the
Hi,
I don't know the direct answer to your question.
But I'm curious as to the use-case that's requiring you to subclass
HttpSession. As opposed to, for example, binding your (Serializable)
objects to the session? Thanks,
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
Milt Epstein writes:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Nick Sharples wrote:
Shapira, Yoav writes:
Hi,
I don't know the direct answer to your question.
But I'm curious as to the use-case that's requiring you to subclass
HttpSession. As opposed to, for example, binding your
Shapira, Yoav writes:
Hi,
I don't know the direct answer to your question.
But I'm curious as to the use-case that's requiring you to subclass
HttpSession. As opposed to, for example, binding your (Serializable)
objects to the session? Thanks,
We have a clustered environment and
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Nick Sharples wrote:
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:45:32 +0100
From: Nick Sharples [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Subclassing the Session object
Milt Epstein
