Re: Using the request object and EL
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 07:14:19AM -0400, John Trollinger wrote:
:
: I have a jsp page that has the following code
: [snip]
: request as EL: ${request.contextPath} br/
: request using page context as EL:
: ${pageContext.request.contextPath} br/
You're using JSTL EL, but you're not closing those expressions in JSTL
tags. That's the only way the page is going to know what you've
included is meant to be JSTL-style dynamic content.
btw, change request to requestScope inside JSTL EL.
-QM
--
software -- http://www.brandxdev.net
tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using the request object and EL
QM,
But the ${pageContext.request.contextPath} prints fine its only the
${request.contextPath} that does not display
And if I do a c:if ${empty request} it returns true but a c:if
${empty pageContext.request} returns false.
It is like I can get to the request through the page context just not
directly
john
-Original Message-
From: QM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 9:44 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Using the request object and EL
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 07:14:19AM -0400, John Trollinger wrote:
:
: I have a jsp page that has the following code
: [snip]
: request as EL: ${request.contextPath} br/
: request using page context as EL:
: ${pageContext.request.contextPath} br/
You're using JSTL EL, but you're not closing those expressions in JSTL
tags. That's the only way the page is going to know what you've
included is meant to be JSTL-style dynamic content.
btw, change request to requestScope inside JSTL EL.
-QM
--
software -- http://www.brandxdev.net
tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using the request object and EL
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 10:03:09AM -0400, John Trollinger wrote:
: But the ${pageContext.request.contextPath} prints fine its only the
: ${request.contextPath} that does not display
Fair cup -- I can't tell you what you've seen; I can only tell you what
(I thought) shouldn't work ;)
You're using one of the new JSP 2.0 JSP file tags, I take it?
: And if I do a c:if ${empty request} it returns true but a c:if
: ${empty pageContext.request} returns false.
What about the other info I gave you? Changing request to
requestScope w/in JSTL EL?
-QM
--
software -- http://www.brandxdev.net
tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using the request object and EL
Problem solved. I was mixing up 2 parts of the spec and therefor made
the wrong assumption.
Thanks,
John
-Original Message-
From: QM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 10:13 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Using the request object and EL
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 10:03:09AM -0400, John Trollinger wrote:
: But the ${pageContext.request.contextPath} prints fine its only the
: ${request.contextPath} that does not display
Fair cup -- I can't tell you what you've seen; I can only tell you what
(I thought) shouldn't work ;)
You're using one of the new JSP 2.0 JSP file tags, I take it?
: And if I do a c:if ${empty request} it returns true but a c:if
: ${empty pageContext.request} returns false.
What about the other info I gave you? Changing request to
requestScope w/in JSTL EL?
-QM
--
software -- http://www.brandxdev.net
tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
