Re: mod_jk: download speed problem

2005-03-09 Thread Mikhail Kruk
No one responded to my previous question, so let me try again. Is anyone here running Tomcat 5.0.x + mod_jk + Apache and downloading large files through it with normal a throughput? On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Mikhail Kruk wrote: apache 2.0.53 tomcat 5.0.29 mod_jk 1.2.8, worker configured to do

RE: mod_jk: download speed problem

2005-03-09 Thread Phillip Qin
Why don't you JkUnMount /download_dir your_worker? -Original Message- From: Mikhail Kruk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March 9, 2005 4:46 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk: download speed problem No one responded to my previous question, so let me try again. Is anyone here

Re: mod_jk: download speed problem

2005-03-09 Thread Mladen Turk
Mikhail Kruk wrote: No one responded to my previous question, so let me try again. Is anyone here running Tomcat 5.0.x + mod_jk + Apache and downloading large files through it with normal a throughput? Server Software:Apache/2.0.53 Server Hostname:localhost Server Port:

RE: mod_jk: download speed problem

2005-03-09 Thread Mikhail Kruk
: March 9, 2005 4:46 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk: download speed problem No one responded to my previous question, so let me try again. Is anyone here running Tomcat 5.0.x + mod_jk + Apache and downloading large files through it with normal a throughput? On Tue, 8 Mar 2005

Re: mod_jk: download speed problem

2005-03-09 Thread Mikhail Kruk
Document Path: /servlets-examples/test.jpg And this goes through mod_jk, right? Document Length:1513456 bytes This is on WIN32, also localhost. I've tried on RH9, SLES8.2 and FreeBSD 4.11 and found no slowdown. Can you post your config files? What did you use to get this

Re: mod_jk: download speed problem

2005-03-09 Thread Mikhail Kruk
workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/tomcat workers.java_home=/usr/local/j2sdk ps=/ worker.list=worker1 worker.worker1.type=ajp13 worker.worker1.host=localhost worker.worker1.port=8009 #worker.worker1.lbfactor=50 #worker.worker1.cachesize=10 #worker.worker1.cache_timeout=600