: Jerry Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Tomcat Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Yes!!! It works!!! (was: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer)
Justin, I owe you a beer...
I removed the two listener statements that you
Message-
From: Jerry Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 5:31 PM
To: Justin L. Spies
Cc: 'Tomcat Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Yes!!! It works!!! (was: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting
closer)
Justin, I owe you a beer...
I removed the two listener
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Yes!!! It works!!! (was: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting
closer)
This was a message I thought I had sent to the list, but I somehow managed
to send it to Jerry directly...
Congratulations Jerry! Glad to hear that you've got a working system now!
Just
-Original Message-
From: Denise Mangano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 10:09 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Yes!!! It works!!! (was: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting
closer)
Justin -
Any thoughts on why that did the trick? As I mentioned, those
was
expecting.
John
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 12:07 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Yes!!! It works!!! (was: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting
closer)
Just to clarify one point for the benefit of the list:
Justin L. Spies
Users List'
Subject: RE: Yes!!! It works!!! (was: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting
closer)
This was a message I thought I had sent to the list, but I somehow
managed to send it to Jerry directly...
Congratulations Jerry! Glad to hear that you've got a working system
now!
Just for the benefit
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
John:
Sorry, I had changed ajp13 to worker1 in trying to emulate Denise's
working setup, but that didn't do any good so I changed it back and
inadvertently put the dot in. But it doesn't matter, it doesn't work
either way.
As noted in earlier e
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Jerry Ford wrote:
John:
Sorry, I had changed ajp13 to worker1 in trying to emulate Denise's
working setup, but that didn't do any good so I changed it back and
inadvertently put the dot in. But it doesn't matter, it doesn't work
either way.
One things I don't
: Thursday, December 26, 2002 12:32 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
John:
Sorry, I had changed ajp13 to worker1 in trying to emulate Denise's
working setup, but that didn't do any good so I changed it back and
inadvertently put the dot in. But it doesn't
I use the mod_jk binary obtained from John Turner's how-to page, and the
httpd.conf and server.xml statements are the same as the statements in
the configurations several other people here have provided as examples,
I think. I have also tried to follow John Turner's suggested
confuguration
and log
directories
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
Yes. Same results.
PELOQUIN,JEFFREY (HP-Boise,ex1) wrote:
Your http.conf shows
, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
I use the mod_jk binary obtained from John Turner's how-to page, and the
httpd.conf and server.xml statements are the same as the statements in
the configurations several other people here have provided
-
From: Jerry Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
I use the mod_jk binary obtained from John Turner's how-to page, and the
httpd.conf and server.xml statements are the same as the statements
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
I use the mod_jk binary obtained from John Turner's how-to page, and the
httpd.conf and server.xml statements are the same as the statements in
the configurations
26, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
Yes. Same results.
PELOQUIN,JEFFREY (HP-Boise,ex1) wrote:
Your http.conf shows that apache is running as nobody
have you tried changing that so it runs as the owner of the apache and
tomcat directory
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
I use the mod_jk binary obtained from John Turner's how-to page, and the
httpd.conf and server.xml statements are the same as the statements in
the configurations several
: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
I use the mod_jk binary obtained from John Turner's how-to page, and the
httpd.conf and server.xml statements are the same as the statements in
the configurations several other people here have provided as examples,
I think. I have also tried to follow
..
Denise
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 4:31 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
Yes, good idea about the symbolic links. I have done now so---sym links
for both apache and tomcat.
I
..
Denise
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 4:31 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
Yes, good idea about the symbolic links. I have done now so---sym links
for both apache
to that directory. Also makes testing and
moving between 1.3.27 and 2.0.x a piece of cake.
John
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 3:13 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
Ooops, sorry
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 6:22 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
Denise:
Other than path names, the major differences between your set up and
mine is that you use SSL, and I don't, and you have a lot more modules
loaded than I
/some.jsp
Are those what you are trying?
John
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 6:22 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
Denise:
Other than path names, the major differences between your
Thanks to some examples of working configs provided by several people
here, I am making progress in getting Apache 1.3.27 and Tomcat 4.1.12 to
work together through mod_jk, but it still isn't working yet.
Tomcat and Apache run fine independently:
http://localhost opens Apache's index.html
/workers.properties
config=/usr/local/webserver/tomcat/conf/jk2.properties
Not sure where those are set in the server.xml as I hard code my http.conf
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 10:42 AM
To: tomcat-user
Subject: mod_jk---still trying
Justin L. Spies
URI: http://www.pantek.com
Ph 440.519.1802
Fax 440.248.5274
Cell 440.336.3317
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:42 PM
To: tomcat-user
Subject: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
Thanks to some examples
: http://www.pantek.com
Ph 440.519.1802
Fax 440.248.5274
Cell 440.336.3317
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:42 PM
To: tomcat-user
Subject: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
Thanks to some examples of working configs
Incorporated
Justin L. Spies
URI: http://www.pantek.com
Ph 440.519.1802
Fax 440.248.5274
Cell 440.336.3317
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:42 PM
To: tomcat-user
Subject: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
Thanks to some
, December 24, 2002 12:49 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
Justin:
My bad. I didn't copy and paste, I retyped the JkLogFile reference. In
the config, it correctly says mod_jk.log.
I don't understand what would be accomplished by changing
jakarta-tomcat
, 2002 12:49 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
Justin:
My bad. I didn't copy and paste, I retyped the JkLogFile reference. In
the config, it correctly says mod_jk.log.
I don't understand what would be accomplished by changing
jakarta-tomcat
there is
a mismatch of names
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:49 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk---still trying, getting closer
Justin:
My bad. I didn't copy and paste, I retyped the JkLogFile reference
30 matches
Mail list logo
