[ot] request / suggestion
please have the list server put the list name in the subject, example: [Tomcat-User] SSL Mode Re: [Tomcat-User] SSL Mode -jason pyeron -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron http://www.pyerotechnics.com - - Owner Lead Pyerotechnics Development, Inc. - - +1 410 808 6646 (c) 500 West University Parkway #1S - - +1 410 467 2266 (f) Baltimore, Maryland 21210-3253 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, purge the message from your system and notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: request / suggestion
I disagree...Please *DO NOT* mangle Subject to include any extra garbage. Screen real-estate is valuable, and there are other ways to filter messages. -- Jim McMaster mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jas on Pyeron said: please have the list server put the list name in the subject, example: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: request / suggestion
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jason Pyeron said: please have the list server put the list name in the subject, example: I'm opposed to this idea. It's already possible to filter on the To or Cc addresses, so adding something like this to enable filtering on the Subject is redundant. Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: request / suggestion
As I have a big screen... And I dont like to filter my messages... I guess it could be done in procmail. I will work on it and post my solution for those who would like it. this will just leave the Outlook users on there own? can the list server be configured per user? -jp On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, James C. McMaster (Jim) wrote: I disagree...Please *DO NOT* mangle Subject to include any extra garbage. Screen real-estate is valuable, and there are other ways to filter messages. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron http://www.pyerotechnics.com - - Owner Lead Pyerotechnics Development, Inc. - - +1 410 808 6646 (c) 500 West University Parkway #1S - - +1 410 467 2266 (f) Baltimore, Maryland 21210-3253 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, purge the message from your system and notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: request / suggestion
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Jason Pyeron wrote: Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 15:35:03 -0500 (EST) From: Jason Pyeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: request / suggestion As I have a big screen... And I dont like to filter my messages... I guess it could be done in procmail. I will work on it and post my solution for those who would like it. Procmail would work. So do the filters in any reasonable email reader. My default practice is to filter each mailling list into a separate folder that I can then peruse when I'm interested in that particular area. this will just leave the Outlook users on there own? Why? Outlook has filters as well. (Not that I'd ever incur the security risks of running Outlook on *my* computer ...). can the list server be configured per user? Nope. Even if the software would allow it, nobody would want to afford the extra hardware it would take to send almost 2400 individualized copies of every TOMCAT-USER posting, versus one copy to 2400 destinations. -jp Craig On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, James C. McMaster (Jim) wrote: I disagree...Please *DO NOT* mangle Subject to include any extra garbage. Screen real-estate is valuable, and there are other ways to filter messages. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron http://www.pyerotechnics.com - - Owner Lead Pyerotechnics Development, Inc. - - +1 410 808 6646 (c) 500 West University Parkway #1S - - +1 410 467 2266 (f) Baltimore, Maryland 21210-3253 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, purge the message from your system and notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
