://balance.sourceforge.net on unix only
Filip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 6:09 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: WAS: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Ok here is what is going on.
Seams like the problem is not with the
: WAS: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Ok here is what is going on.
Seams like the problem is not with the tomcat replication but with the
damned JK balancer. :(
When the 2nd tomcat node is shutdown, the balancer resend all the
request pending to the other node. (BUT, without the parameter.)
I sent 50
Ok here is what is going on.
Seams like the problem is not with the tomcat replication but with the
damned JK balancer. :(
When the 2nd tomcat node is shutdown, the balancer resend all the
request pending to the other node. (BUT, without the parameter.)
I sent 50 request to each node (or so) whe
if you have a test case for me I can take a look and see what happens
Filip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 11:12 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: WAS: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
That's the catch. Everything
o: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: WAS: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
I've tried to replicate the problem with a simple servlet. outside of
our MVC architecture (controller). and seams like I can't.
I've put traces
TED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: WAS: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
I've tried to replicate the problem with a simple servlet. outside of
our MVC architecture (controller). and seams like I can't.
I
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:56 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: WAS: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
I understand that. Here more info...
I make a servlet request that does this:
while ( i < 25 ) {
if ( request.getParameters("xxx&
Well then... Sorry about misunderstanding.
I'll try to remove my thousand of quotes now! :P and keep only the last one
Jean-Philippe Bélanger
CGI
Ralph Einfeldt wrote:
He didn't critique that you posted, just how.
He doesn't like posts with quotes that are not
needed. (That's the attitude of man
PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:42 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: WAS: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
>
> And your reply is better?
> I'm trying to get that replication thing working with Filip.
>
--
And your reply is better?
I'm trying to get that replication thing working with Filip. If there is
something imcompatible with his code that make this behavior happens. I
will try and find it before giving him the job. He's not the only one
that has to work with this. I'm offering my help. I'm
This is the kind of behaviour that I really
cannot understand. Makes archiving a pain and is
totally inconsiderate.
At 8:23 am -0500 2004/01/13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still checking to make sure it ain't on my side (MVC or such)
Jean-Philippe Bélanger
CGI
[25kB of inessential quote]
---
r me to do
reproduce this.
do you by any chance have the test program you have and would email it to
me?
Filip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:56 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: WAS: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
I
Filip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:56 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: WAS: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
I understand that. Here more info...
I make a servlet request that does this:
while ( i < 25 )
rmance a lot. Try it out, and let me know how it works for
you
You will notice the improvement under load.
of course, get latest from cvs first
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:05 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subjec
can you check the logs, if there is an uncaught exception, the ACK will
never get sent
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:39 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: WAS: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
I had a
replicated, I am working on that right now
Filip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:29 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: WAS: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Been working on testing the new modules and came across something weird
1:29 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: WAS: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Been working on testing the new modules and came across something weird.
Wondering if you got any idea on the cause/problem while I continue
investigating
Scenario:
- one web page login in a user. receive 3 parameters
let me know how it works for
you
You will notice the improvement under load.
of course, get latest from cvs first
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:05 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Repli
me know how it
works for
you
You will notice the improvement under load.
of course, get latest from cvs first
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:05 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replicati
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:05 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Hrmmm, perhaps I should reboot using the non-SMP kernel and try it. I'll
have to do that when I get back to the servers.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[E
D]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:05 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Hrmmm, perhaps I should reboot using the non-SMP kernel and try it. I'll
have to do that when I get back to the servers.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:
Hrmmm, perhaps I should reboot using the non-SMP kernel and try it. I'll
have to do that when I get back to the servers.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:04 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0
rd Edition (build 1.4.2_03-b02)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_03-b02, mixed mode)
same on both
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:56 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]
b02, mixed mode)
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:05 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
sun JDK 1.4.2 for Linux
Kernel 2.4.20-8smp
Tomcat 5.0.16 with catalina-cluster.jar from CVS head
ECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:59 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Now that's really very strange. I am running RH9 and everything seems to go
through just fine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
interesting, mine doesn't work at all unless I set the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL
what VM (version and name) are you using?
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:59
interesting, mine doesn't work at all unless I set the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL
what VM (version and name) are you using?
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:59 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0
Now that's really very strange. I am running RH9 and everything seems to go
through just fine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:56 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
The replic
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Just tried the CVS head and everything works with any CPU going crazy!
only if ld_assume_kernel is set to 2.4
One more question fo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:33 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Just tried the CVS head and everything works with any CPU going crazy!
only if ld_assume_kernel is set to 2.4
One more question for
I don't seem to need the ld_assume_kernel thing. What are the symptoms when
it is required?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Just tried the CVS
ut after a long time.
>>
>> I set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 and it started to work
>>
>> Filip
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:43 PM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: RE:
I will be implementing some performance improvements today.
I'll let you know how it goes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 4:33 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Hurray for Fillip! :)
Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
ok guys,
good news. The 100% cpu is totally my fault. I messed up on that one.
I was registering OP_WRITE as an interest
this is not good :)
checking in the working
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
ok guys,
good news. The 100% cpu is totally my fault. I messed up on that one.
I was registering OP_WRITE as an interest
this is not good :)
checking in the working code in 15 min, some more r
work
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
ok guys,
good news. The 100% cpu is totally my fault. I messed up on that one.
I was registering OP_WRITE as an int
: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:54 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
another code change was, that I am now accepting keys for OP_READ and
OP_WRITE. before it was only OP_READ,
but for synchronous replication I need both.
this is good info, I just got RH9 installed. will be
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 11:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
The only changes in the ReplicationListener class is the try catch that
was added.
the code logic is the same. Weird enough. So it's probably elsewhere
that some
004 12:25 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
More content for you Filip.
I've checked and followed the code of the listen event in
ReplicationListener.java
Here's what happening:
selector.select(timeout) -> return immediatly with one SelectorKey availabl
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:25 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
More content for you Filip.
I've checked and followed the code of the listen event in
ReplicationListener.java
Here's what happening:
selector.select(timeout) -> ret
g today. Will let you know how it goes
also, try asynchronous replication, does it still go to 100%?
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:08 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Oka
oing today. Will let you know how it goes
also, try asynchronous replication, does it still go to 100%?
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:08 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Ends up doing the same thing.
The variable was set. I checked it with an echo.
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:05 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
you should do
export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL
you should do
export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1
not
export set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1
in regular bash shell
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 1:38 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:03 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Okay, I reverted back to the 5.0.16 version and now I don't have the high
CPU ute.
But it takes almost 60 seconds for the Manager to requ
stem level as opposed the the java executable. Sounds
like
alot of the load may be in system calls.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 2:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
I'll try
e the java executable. Sounds
like
alot of the load may be in system calls.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 2:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
I'll try to get an instance going toda
27;
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Okay, did that got this
BEGIN TO RECEIVE
SENT:Default 1
RECEIVED:Default 1 FROM /10.0.0.110:
SENT:Default 2
BEGIN TO RECEIVE
RECEIVED:Default 2 FROM /10.0.0.110:
SENT:Default 3
BEGIN TO RECEIVE
RECEIVED:Default 3 FROM /10.0.0.110:
SENT:Default 4
B
Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 1:58 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
100% cpu can mean that you have a multicast problem, try to run
java -cp tomcat-replication.jar MCaster
download the jar from http://cvs.apache.org/~f
EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
I was having random problems with clustering when starting up. Mostly it had
to do with Timing out
when the manager was starting up. I built the CVS version and it solved that
problem. But it has caused
some serious performance problems.
Firs
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Currently running tomcat 5.0.16 with the CVS HEAD of the replication module.
This is under redhat 9. So far so good.
What kind of problem did you encounter under rh9?
Jean-Philippe
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 1:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Currently running tomcat 5.0.16 with the CVS HEAD of the replication module.
This is under redhat 9. So far so good.
What kind of
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
Currently running tomcat 5.0.16 with the CVS HEAD of the replication module.
This is under redhat 9. So far so good.
What kind of problem did you encounter under rh9?
Jean-Philippe Bélanger
e not successfully ran tomcat clustering on RH9, I use RH8.
I also don't have a RH9 machine at home yet, so I can't develop for it
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 6:51 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 6:51 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
I was having random problems with clustering when starting up. Mostly it had
to do with Timing out
when the manager was starting up. I built the CVS version and it solved that
p
I was having random problems with clustering when starting up. Mostly it had
to do with Timing out
when the manager was starting up. I built the CVS version and it solved that
problem. But it has caused
some serious performance problems.
First a little background.
I have 2 servers, dual 300m
t: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
I built the latest CVS branch for the clustering module and replaced my
catalina-cluster.jar.
Seams like everything is synchronous as stated.
I had another unrelated problem with a IFRAME that IE seams to load before
the server (tomcat) ends the request. So ev
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 8:07 PM
To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
it will come out in the next release.
Filip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 9:41 AM
To: Tomcat
it will come out in the next release.
Filip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 9:41 AM
To: Tomcat-user
Subject: tomcat 5.0.16 Replication
The new tomcat 5.0.16 replication seams to work odly.
>From what I'
The new tomcat 5.0.16 replication seams to work odly.
From what I've read from the documentation and the mailing list, the clustering is
supposed to be done synchronously.
Right?
Well that's not what's happening on my end, the client receives the response before
the whole repli
61 matches
Mail list logo