Re: volunteering to enhance docs for mod_jk local_worker_only (server quiescence)

2005-02-21 Thread Michael Greer
Mladen, Built new jk from CVS. How to I access the lovely status page? /jkstatus as in jk2? Do have to enable it? Docs do not seem to be updated yet. Looking forward to playing with it! thanks, -Michael Greer On Feb 19, 2005, at 2:44 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: Michael Greer wrote: Mladen , That

Re: volunteering to enhance docs for mod_jk local_worker_only (server quiescence)

2005-02-21 Thread Michael Greer
Ah, I extrapolated from the jk2 docs: workers.properties: worker.status.type=status httpd.conf: JkMount /jkstatus/* status Nice! -Michael Greer On Feb 22, 2005, at 1:01 AM, Michael Greer wrote: Mladen, Built new jk from CVS. How to I access the lovely status page? /jkstatus as in

volunteering to enhance docs for mod_jk local_worker_only (server quiescence)

2005-02-19 Thread Michael Greer
I have been looking around the web to figure out how to implement server quiescence (starving sessions from server in balanced set to take it down for maintenance). The documentation on the jakarta site confused me, and it looks like I am not alone. More people have questions than answers. I

Re: volunteering to enhance docs for mod_jk local_worker_only (server quiescence)

2005-02-19 Thread Mladen Turk
Michael Greer wrote: Should I take the trouble? local_worker and local_worker_only flags will be deprecated. (already are with the current 1.2.9-dev) There has been more powerful mechanism implemented, that is IMO more clearer and acts like it should. 1.2.9 has shared memory and status page that

Re: volunteering to enhance docs for mod_jk local_worker_only (server quiescence)

2005-02-19 Thread Michael Greer
Mladen , That sounds like the right solution! I think I remember the status page from jk2, and it is a good idea. -Michael Greer On Feb 19, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: Michael Greer wrote: Should I take the trouble? local_worker and local_worker_only flags will be deprecated. (already

Re: volunteering to enhance docs for mod_jk local_worker_only (server quiescence)

2005-02-19 Thread Mladen Turk
Michael Greer wrote: Mladen , That sounds like the right solution! I think I remember the status page from jk2, and it is a good idea. Yes, we are trying to backport all goodies from jk2 now that is deprecated and no longer maintained. Not only that. It will have options to fully edit properties,