Re: Performance proxy_ajp vs. mod_jk when TOMCAT integration with Apache
Hi, Can somebody tell me what the difference between the proxy_ajp and mod_jk is. thanks, Christine --- Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Xuekun Hu wrote: Hi, From performance point, which connector will be used for TOMCAT intergration with Apache? proxy_ajp or mod_jk? I read some docs which said mod_jk should have better performance than proxying. While proxy_ajp in Apache2.1 is an addition to the mod_proxy and uses Tomcat's AJP protocol stack. So I ask the upper question. Right, both mod_jk and proxy_ajp have almost the same performance, and they are up to twice as fast compared with http mostly because of constant connection pool. AJP protocol gives it's share too by transferring less data across the wire. If you are using Apache 2.1+ there is no need to use mod_jk and maintain additional module. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Performance proxy_ajp vs. mod_jk when TOMCAT integration with Apache
proxy_ajp is mod_jk successor in Apache2.1/2.2 core. You can find more info: http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.1/mod/mod_proxy.html http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.1/mod/mod_proxy_ajp.html http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.1/mod/mod_proxy_balancer.html Thx, Xuekun On 8/17/05, Christine Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Can somebody tell me what the difference between the proxy_ajp and mod_jk is. thanks, Christine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Performance proxy_ajp vs. mod_jk when TOMCAT integration with Apache
Xuekun Hu wrote: Hi, From performance point, which connector will be used for TOMCAT intergration with Apache? proxy_ajp or mod_jk? I read some docs which said mod_jk should have better performance than proxying. While proxy_ajp in Apache2.1 is an addition to the mod_proxy and uses Tomcat's AJP protocol stack. So I ask the upper question. Right, both mod_jk and proxy_ajp have almost the same performance, and they are up to twice as fast compared with http mostly because of constant connection pool. AJP protocol gives it's share too by transferring less data across the wire. If you are using Apache 2.1+ there is no need to use mod_jk and maintain additional module. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
