RE: Tomcat 3.2 or 4.0 standalone, which is better to use now?

[Michael Weissenbacher]

if it's for stability then coose a apache/tomcat combination. it's
definately more stable and also faster than using tomcat standalone.
i know this wasn't your question, but i definately didn't have good
experiences with tomcat standalone. i think it's main purpose is for
testing.

-Original Message-
From: Laurens Fridael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:33 PM
To: Tomcat mailing list
Subject: Tomcat 3.2 or 4.0 standalone, which is better to use now?


Hi,


Which is better for standalone usage? Tomcat 3.2 or 4.0 beta6 ? Stability is
my most important consideration.

I know Tomcat 4 is still beta but I read that it already performs well. I'm
currently experimenting with a Apache/Tomcat 3.2 combination but I find the
Apache URL mapping configuration too much work.


Regards
-Laurens

Re: Tomcat 3.2 or 4.0 standalone, which is better to use now?

[Pier P. Fumagalli]

Laurens Fridael at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Which is better for standalone usage? Tomcat 3.2 or 4.0 beta6 ? Stability is
 my most important consideration.
 I know Tomcat 4 is still beta but I read that it already performs well.

Without ANY whatsoever doubt... 4.0.

 I'm currently experimenting with a Apache/Tomcat 3.2 combination but I find
 the Apache URL mapping configuration too much work.

Try mod_webapp... It's a one-line configuration solution...

Pier