Hi,
Richard Earnshaw would be the right person to answer this.
Regards
Deepak Bhatia
-Original Message-
From: michael.s.walker at gmail.com [mailto:michael.s.wal...@gmail.com]on
Behalf Of Michael Walker
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:21 PM
To: Deepak Bhatia
Cc: tools-linking at op
Hi Michael,
I see that you have written the TLS related stuff for Sparc and i386. Does
the ARM
has the same implications for various TLS models like General Dynamic, Local
Dynamic,
, Initial Exec and local-exec.
Regards
Deepak Bhatia
-Original Message-
From: tools-linking-boun...@openso
This is not an answer - perhaps just an intermediate step, and only for SPARC.
http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=43fb4c75
(gcc front end, command line options, and ABI (differs in the case of C++)
combined with Studio code generator for generally better performance)
This message pos
I have a large customer looking for tips/tricks and documents that help
with migrating from GCC to the Studio tools. Are there any papers out
there that can be referenced or distributed?
Thanks,
bk
I'm not familiar with the ARM processor - so I can't say definitively one
way or the other. But I would assume so - yes.
Have TLS instruction sequences been defined for the ARM processor? That would
answer your question I think.
_Mike_
On 2/22/07, Deepak Bhatia wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I see
Here's a quick example:
collage0021# elfdump -c data.so
collage0021# more data.c
static int local_var = 0;
int *global_data = &local_var;
collage0021# gcc -fpic -shared data.c -o data.so
collage0021# elfdump -r data.so | grep RELATIVE
R_386_RELATIVE 0x105cc .rel.data.rel