On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.de wrote:
Magnus Manske schrieb:
I agree about Semantic MediaWiki, which is a different beast (and
might one day be used on Wikipedia).
That's really the question. Should we work *now* on making it usable for
wikipedia, or
Magnus Manske schrieb:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.de wrote:
Magnus Manske schrieb:
I agree about Semantic MediaWiki, which is a different beast (and
might one day be used on Wikipedia).
That's really the question. Should we work *now* on making it
Hi all
I have finally updated the toolserver.wiki and toolserver.namespace table. I'll
look into automating this process for the future.
I have also added a new table to the toolserver database:
toolserver.namespacename. This is similar to the toolserver.namespace table, but
includesd *all*
IMHO we should try to harvest the data that is already in
Wikipedia first.
That's what DBpedia does. Currently, we concentrate on
infoboxes. We extract data from infobox templates and
store the data as RDF. Queries against the data are
usually done with SPARQL, e.g. at http://dbpedia.org/sparql
Christopher Sahnwaldt schrieb:
I'm pretty new to MediaWiki and I'm not sure if I understand
this correctly... Here's my attempt at spelling it out in a bit
more detail:
When a user edits a page and sends the new text to the
server, the server / the RDF extension parses the text, extracts
Hi all,
Magnus wrote: ...Like TemplateTiger...
Thanks for this honor. :-)
If someone don't know this project, see here:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProjekt_Vorlagenauswertung/en
In the next time we want support more languages. The same languages as
in
