Hi, Richard,
A bit of errata to correct my previous post: The difference in
current will not be as large as I stated in my last post, because for
the pair of 1/16 radials I did not divide the source current between
the two 1/16 radials, and therefore the difference is not nearly as
large. This
Moxon, G6XN once proposed using elevated radials that wereless than ¼
wavelength long, tied together and fed through a commoninductor.His idea was it
would beeasier to achieve current and phase balance between the radials if they
weren’tphysically resonant.I believe this waswritten up in one of
Hi, Carl,
I repeat, a folded counterpoise is NO substitute for a dense and
uniform system, which is what you had in the end.
My question for you is if you had a 70 x 10 foot strip of that rocky
stuff to construct a counterpoise, and that was all the space you had,
period, and your neighbors
Tom,
I only have about 491 ft of window line and thats what I am using for the two
direction beverage. Placement is in part dictated by the hill but mostly the
rationalle
for the 300 or so feet from the inverted L is that it has a lot of noise. It
is terrible actually
much of which
Ya... Camouflage works...
Hi, Carl,
I repeat, a folded counterpoise is NO substitute for a dense and uniform
system, which is what you had in the end.
My question for you is if you had a 70 x 10 foot strip of that rocky stuff
to construct a counterpoise, and that was all the space you had,
You sort of lost me a day or so Guy as the posts were getting way too long
and boring (-; that I deleted after the first page.
It appears that the FCP sort of took over the radial discussion somewhere
along the way when I was sleeping and the subject line changed..
How about we leave the FCP to
I haven't been following this thread real close, but I folded the two 10'
high elevated 1/4λ radials on my own 3/8λ inverted-L --per Guy's suggestion
to me a two or three years ago-- as follows:
Radial # 1: North about half-way (a little less than 1/8λ), then east 10',
then south the rest of the
See http://www.w0uce.net/K2AVantennas.html
On 2011-11-16 12:22 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
On 11/16/2011 12:10 AM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
We are testing N3ND's new 160 antenna tonight (Monday local time) 1818 @
0005Z. This is another antenna based on RBN validated untraditional design.
73,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Tom McAlee t...@klient.com wrote:
1. Why the need to keep it 300' from the inverted L? ... My E/W
Beverage, which runs within 100' of my 160m TX vertical ... It is worth
noting that this antenna merely passes by one or more TX verticals within
100'; the
I am curious why you specify #18 Teflon wire for the BOG wire you list
about 1/2 way down the page. Black polyethylene insulated wire would
hold up a lot better over time and would be far cheaper, so I'm curious
if there is some specific reason you would specify Teflon? The only
thing I can think
The BFS-1's are sold pending funds.
Thanks,
Julius
Julius Fazekas
N2WN
Tennessee Contest Group
http://k4tcg.org/
http://groups.google.com/group/tcg1?hl=en
Tennessee QSO Party
http://www.tnqp.org/
Elecraft K2 #4455
Elecraft K3/100 #366
Elecraft K3/100 #
Ive had a single wire 600' BOG for a bit over a year and I must say Im
impressed. Its partially on the ground and rises to 6-8 on ground hugging
shrubs. It doesnt require a preamp, likely due to the poor ground here not
bleeding off signal. Its quiet and less susceptible to crud from a
12 matches
Mail list logo
