Topband: My take on ARRL 160

2011-12-04 Thread N1BUG
I've decided to put my oar in the water regarding the comments on ARRL 160. I didn't operate this year but it is my favorite 160 contest and the only one I would seriously enter. Why? Because mostly it does end up being a domestic contest and I have some chance of being competitive with my

Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160

2011-12-04 Thread James Rodenkirch
I figured that QRM was a HUGE problem on the east side of the country, Paul, and the major reason why they couldn't hear my peanut whistle signal!! I agree that the Top Band contests during December are a bit much BUT I'm in them 'cuz I need about 10 states for QRP WAS on 160 - mostly east

Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160

2011-12-04 Thread Mike Fatchett W0MU
I didn't realize that 160 and all its challenges to get on this band with a decent xmit and receive antennas was the birthplace of new contesters. On 12/4/11 8:39 AM, Herb Schoenbohm wrote: On 12/4/2011 11:09 AM, Eddy Swynar wrote: Rather than decry the format of the event, why not celebrate

Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160

2011-12-04 Thread Michael G. Carper
On the point of being zero-beat with the station you're calling... you almost need to run CW Skimmer for that here. I called a station - exactly zero beat... and a station just below me was answering back. -Original Message- From: topband-boun...@contesting.com

Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160

2011-12-04 Thread Eddy Swynar
On 2011-12-04, at 10:51 AM, Mike Fatchett W0MU wrote: I didn't realize that 160 and all its challenges to get on this band with a decent xmit and receive antennas was the birthplace of new contesters. hi Mike, Well it certainly was for me! Topband and---believe it, or not---Field Day

Topband: My Take on ARRL 160

2011-12-04 Thread Eddy Swynar
On 4 December Mike wrote: MAR section includes NB (VE9), NS (VE1) and VY2 (PEI).sometimes MAR even included VO1 and VO2 !!! We have to compete against hams in three provinces for most ARRL contests. Does RI get lumped in with EMA and CT? - Nope! Does Montana get lumped in with Wyoming and

Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160 (MAR)

2011-12-04 Thread ZR
Low ham population and a small geographical area Mike. You, or anyone else aint gonna change the ARRL for any reason...its a dictatorship. Carl KM1H - Original Message - From: Mike Coreen Smith ve...@nbnet.nb.ca To: Topband Topband@contesting.com Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011

Topband: ARRL 160 conditions

2011-12-04 Thread Brian_ve7jkz
Very disappointing indeed, although always nice to work the east coast, ME, WNY, VA, MAR (PEI) etc from the wet coast. And CE3 was a nice one. For the propagation experts out there did the poor conditions reflect the increasing solar flux as the new cycle gets going? Or is it just one of those

Topband: ARRL 160

2011-12-04 Thread Charles W. Shaw
Yes, But, From southeast New Mexico, on my Saturday AM, I found that JA stations were the loudest I have ever heard any of them in any contest for the past 24 years. I was CQing and they answered me--loud. Sunday morning, fewer JA's and not quite as loud. Best DX to the NE was a

Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160 (MAR)

2011-12-04 Thread Mike Coreen Smith
You may be partially right, but we have 35 members in the Maritime Contest Club and another 4 or 5 active or semi active stations that contest, that are NOT part of the club. Granted , not everyone is on for every contest, but as I said before, for any of the popular contests, we are much more

Re: Topband: ARRL 160 conditions

2011-12-04 Thread Wayne Mills
Bang on zero beat IS a problem. I am noticing more and more of that as (I guess) more and more guys rely on SPOTTING SOFTWARE! Agh! It doesn't make any sense to call exactly zero beat. As I mentioned in an earlier post, using directional receive only antennas seems to be a problem. Maybe I

Topband: ARRL 160 viewed from EU

2011-12-04 Thread Dr. Wolf Ostwald
hi reflectees ! This years ARRL160 did not yield the propagation we had last year. There was an unpenetrable curtain from VE2 thru the great plains down to the rocky mountain division. At least true from my 50deg north location. No w7 or w6 stns heard, no western W0s either. The westernmost

Re: Topband: ARRL 160 conditions

2011-12-04 Thread Roger D Johnson
Many of the stations had very clicky signals making it almost impossible to hear anything between them. As this prevents someone getting close to them and not having any reason to generate a clean signal, this problem will persist. 73, Roger On 12/4/2011 12:02 PM, Brian_ve7jkz wrote: I was

Re: Topband: ARRL 160 conditions

2011-12-04 Thread N1BUG
Bang on zero beat IS a problem. I am noticing more and more of that as (Iguess) more and more guys rely on SPOTTING SOFTWARE! Agh! It doesn't make any sense to call exactly zero beat. Huh? As I stated earlier, out here with the QRM and crowding if you are not darn close to zero beat

Re: Topband: ARRL 160 conditions

2011-12-04 Thread W5JR - Mike
Dead on Zero Beat is OK if there is only one station ZB. Same is true is there is only one station up or down X number of hertz. The problem with newer transceivers and the skimmers is that several answer ZB and that last filter, the old ear, can't separate them when the signals are similar in

Re: Topband: ARRL 160 conditions

2011-12-04 Thread w7...@juno.com
How about W7IJ who was 10 kc up and I had a drifty 519 signal off freq both days...Mark W7MEM -- Original Message -- From: Roger D Johnson n...@roadrunner.com To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL 160 conditions Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:36:21 -0500 Many of the

Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160 (MAR)

2011-12-04 Thread W2RU - Bud Hippisley
On Dec 4, 2011, at 11:52 AM, KM1H wrote: Low ham population and a small geographical area Mike. You, or anyone else aint gonna change the ARRL for any reason...its a dictatorship. The origin of the multipliers for the ARRL 160 contest is in the ARRL Field Organization structure at the

Re: Topband: ARRL 160 Conditions, Key Clicks

2011-12-04 Thread Preston Smith
Concur with Roger, N1RJ. Saturday morning a zero a few hundred miles away in Colorado started CQing less than 250 Hz above my run QRG. I use a K3 and this is normally no problem but his sig had severe clicks. I told him he had bad clicks and asked him to go from full to semi-breakin. I've found

Topband: ARRL 160 and zero beat

2011-12-04 Thread VE2TZT
I must admit that I have given up understanding how and why so many are calling so far from the zero beat. During this 160 ARRL and more generally all CW contests, at several instances I answered to the guy two times without knowing exactly which one was for me and which one for my running

Topband: email change

2011-12-04 Thread Jim and Ella
Please change my email address from wb5oxq@ to wb5ox...@grandecom.net ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

Topband: Rain gutter redeux

2011-12-04 Thread jon jones
I got on early Sunday morning around 1000 utc after getting home from work. Added another 28 QSOs using the gutter antenna. Conditions better to the east coast with K8PO ME and VE2OJ PQ worked. Numerous W2s and 3s loud around 1100 utc. Noise level high on it and probably more potential

Re: Topband: An observation about Topband contesting technique

2011-12-04 Thread Steven Raas
I agree 100%, I run alot.. but im FAR FAR from big.. my rule of thumbs is... Calling CQ TEST.. leave enough room between CQ's to hear your own call 2x in a row 10wpm LESS that your CQ'ing at.. I generally cq @ 28 WPM as it says on the N1MM program.. and I had the delay @ about 8 Seconds. Here is

Re: Topband: An observation about Topband contesting technique

2011-12-04 Thread Sam Morgan
since I have a very weak signal (24w ERP from a 7' tall vertical) when I get ask for a repeat of my call I send it again at the original speed but 90% of the time I end up having to repeat more than once and them may even have to reduce my speed to ~13wpm then I finally have my call copied