Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary

2018-11-21 Thread kolson
And this is easy to say when you have 5 acres in a semi-rural area, hi hi. As it happens, I do not use a remote RX (it shows!). But at my QTH I can barely fit a K9AY (though it's compromised by masts and other antennas that are necessarily close). I really dig working what DX I can on 160 but

Topband: Announcing the 22ed Edition of The Stew Perry TopBand DX Challenge

2018-11-21 Thread Lew Sayre
Greetings TopBand Tenants, Renters and Occasional Campers, The Boring Amateur Radio Club wants you to know that you should reserve December 29 and 30 so that you may participate in the most unique 160M contest available, namely The Stew Perry TopBand DX Challenge. Yes, we understand this is

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary

2018-11-21 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
On 2018-11-21 2:39 PM, Bill Cromwell wrote: > > Maintaining a club project "remote" receiver is something I would > support with some money and some work. It's a lot more worthwhile than > yet another two meter FM repeater. I don't really care about using it > for 160 meter DXCC but I would

Topband: Unusual Prop comments for George

2018-11-21 Thread Scott Meister via Topband
Very interesting George. I was seeing very interesting Prop at my extremely north MN QTH a week ago. 48.250 north. This time of year the sun is very low in the ski all day. I could hear EU on all low bands most of the day! Sort of a bit north of you but still interesting similarity. 73 and

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary

2018-11-21 Thread Bill Cromwell
Hi Joe, I live in a small village. Even so, 500 meters isn't going to buy anything. If we were overwhelmed by noise we would still be overwhelmed by exactly the same noise. So this is going to be yet another thread about whose ox is being gored. All those noises don't bother anybody's

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary

2018-11-21 Thread Charlie Young
A DXCC rule change to allow shared use of a low band RX site that is located within a specified distance of the main station makes sense to me. My station hears OK, not top tier by any means, but we work our share when the local power lines behave. For the last month, I have had a single

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary

2018-11-21 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
I think a more practical "Station Location and Boundary, would be to have the RX and TX located in either "in the same grid square" or "within 100 KM" and of course within the same DXCC Entity. I think 500 meters is more than enough of a "circle" to contain both transmit and receive

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary

2018-11-21 Thread David Cutter via Topband
A few UK clubs are doing this or have it in mind, including my own. I think it is the best thing a club can do for its members. David G3UNA/G6CP " I also think that building and maintaining a shared Community Low Noise RX Receiver Site would make a great DX Club project and service."

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary

2018-11-21 Thread Lloyd - N9LB
I'd like to see the ARRL change part mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Thomson Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:57 AM To: TopBand List Subject: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:32:20 -0600 From: "Mike Cizek W0VTT" To: "'Jean-Paul Albert'" ,

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters

2018-11-21 Thread n4cc
The rules say "transmitters and receivers".  They don't refer to antennas being spread over acreage.   73, Greg-N4CCSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Jim Thomson Date: 11/21/18 9:57 AM (GMT-07:00) To: TopBand List Subject: Topband: ARRL

Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters

2018-11-21 Thread Jim Thomson
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:32:20 -0600 From: "Mike Cizek W0VTT" To: "'Jean-Paul Albert'" , Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters <9. Station Location and Boundary: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters

2018-11-21 Thread Jean-Paul Albert via Topband
Thanks Mike for your prompt answer. Rules are very clear about that situation. Thanks to all of YouTube for the great job you do checking QSO’s. See u on top band. Jean-Paul Envoyé de mon iPad > Le 21 nov. 2018 à 16:32, Mike Cizek W0VTT a écrit : > > Hello Jean-Paul, > > From the

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters

2018-11-21 Thread Mike Cizek W0VTT
Hello Jean-Paul, >From the current DXCC Rules: 9. Station Location and Boundary: a) All stations used to make contacts for a specific DXCC award must be located within the same DXCC entity. b) All transmitters and receivers comprising a station used for a specific contact must be

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters

2018-11-21 Thread Jean-Paul Albert via Topband
Hi guys, What about remote stations (to transmit, to receive or both) for any awards ? Is any recommandations for checkers ? Best 73 Jean-Paul F6FYA / TM4Q Envoyé de mon iPad > Le 20 nov. 2018 à 18:55, a écrit : > > Hi Guys > > Here what I think is the problem. DXCC records and link

Topband: Daytime on 160 and Conditions

2018-11-21 Thread GEORGE WALLNER
I am out at C6AGU (FL14) with good 160 m TX and RX antennas. Last night, around 05:00 UTC, I heard a ZS station calling me. I thought no way, I must have copied the call wrong: the gray-line window showed full daylight there. Well, not really: I just got an e-mail from him that he was calling