Re: Topband: FT-8 gentleman's agreement for 160?

2019-01-25 Thread K9FD
FB Prasad, I worked a VU2 on 1840  on DEC 23 2018  so I assume that was just before the new rulings. Thanks for the new info. 73 Merv  K9FD/KH6 Merv and all, We had 1820-1860 kHz in VU but a newly released National Frequency Allocation Plan has changed it to 1800-1825 kHz. Talks are under

Re: Topband: FT-8 gentleman's agreement for 160?

2019-01-25 Thread Manoj Ramawarrier
Hello All, As stated by Prasad already, the new allocation has limited our allocation to 1800-1825 kHZ. We were hoping to get a clarification from our licensing authority and were told in December last week that the new allocation plan would be followed. You would have seen me QRV on FT8

Re: Topband: FT-8 gentleman's agreement for 160?

2019-01-25 Thread Prasad VU2PTT
Merv and all, We had 1820-1860 kHz in VU but a newly released National Frequency Allocation Plan has changed it to 1800-1825 kHz. Talks are under way to try and get back the old frequency allocation but until then we will have to go low and work split on FT8 or other digital modes. Couple of

Re: Topband: FT-8 gentleman's agreement for 160?

2019-01-25 Thread K9FD
I have worked VU2 on FT-8 on 1840 and see them calling cq quite often, JA work split,  there is no reason to work down at 1826 or there abouts unless your just trying to irritate others. Merv K9FD Peter, Not all countries allow FT-8 ops on 1840. JA's work split on 11908. Last night attempts

Re: Topband: FT-8 gentleman's agreement for 160?

2019-01-25 Thread Herbert Schoenbohm
Peter, Not all countries allow FT-8 ops on 1840. JA's work split on 11908. Last night attempts to work a VU2 he was only able to legally TX around 1816 with my FT-8 being on 1844. The agreement came way before FT-8 or other digital modes. They also don't take in consideration for some

Re: Topband: ARRL on 1802.5 Tuesday PM

2019-01-25 Thread F Z_Bruce
The ARRL took a survey and found that 1.802.5 MHZ would be the least problem to DX, and USA users. Many countries can only use the lower part of the band, that goes all the way up to 2 MHZ. for the USA. Hope we can all give each other a little space to enjoy the gentleman's band. Thanks, 73

Re: Topband: ARRL on 1802.5 Tuesday PM

2019-01-25 Thread Mark K3MSB
Eh? Details? On Fri, Jan 25, 2019, 1:09 PM Charles Yahrling And how about the ARRL encouraging AM ops to expand their use of top band > in the latest ARRL promotional email? > _ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Topband: ARRL on 1802.5 Tuesday PM

2019-01-25 Thread Charles Yahrling
I've been chided for having early morning cw rag chews on 1826.5, yet I heard ARRL code practice sessions Tuesday evening from 7PM and later on, while waiting for a top band sprint to start. Seems to me more egregious than having to work around ops trying to make some WAS or DX contacts using

Re: Topband: FT-8 gentleman's agreement for 160?

2019-01-25 Thread Ed Muns
FT8 is at 1840, with the corresponding signals spread between 1840-1842, very contained. No fear of "squeezing CW". Ed W0YK -Original Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Peter Bertini Sent: 25 January, 2019 08:49 To: topband@contesting.com

Topband: FT-8 gentleman's agreement for 160?

2019-01-25 Thread Peter Bertini
I recall hearing FT8 activity on 1830 kHz last evening ... isn't a bit low in the band for digital modes? I hope FT-8 activity doesn't squeeze all of the CW activity down into the DX portion before the dust settles. Pete k1zjh _ Searchable Archives: