GM Herb,
The DXCC Card Checkers do not have to have 160m DXCC
anymorebut they do have to allow their work to be
vetted by HQ. Some field checkers may be unaware of this change; I have
personally run into this problem. I do know that Don Search, W3AZD, checks
160m cards
Hi Topbanders
Guy K2AV - Lots of philosophy ...
ARRL has a program:
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20190624-A4.pdf#page=1=auto,-12,848
ARRL is obliged to protect this program!
But ARRL does not do this ...
This rating has lost its value today.
Unfortunately...
---
Nick
I concur. I wonder if someone could adopt their logs post operation and
provide LOTW as a surrogate? Also, the stations who require green stamps
could learn the OQRS procedure and probably net more income and quicker to
support their operation.
Herb, KV4FZ
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 8:30 AM Tim
Would not a 100% LOTW be the ultimate answer to card frauds? There is, in
fact, is no card checker in the VI for 160 meter QSO's causing me countless
mailings to the DXCC desk. This all could be avoided in the future if the
ARRL went to 100% LOTW. Most rare DX stations would want their
