Re: Topband: New Subject: 160M array feedline question

2021-03-22 Thread Adrian
Interesting page on the subject here ; https://ham.stackexchange.com/questions/3675/what-is-the-effect-of-using-different-number-of-radials-with-ground-plane-antenn On 23/3/21 1:55 pm, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: A counterpoise is what we do when the full size of a double-ended antenna, dipole,

Re: Topband: New Subject: 160M array feedline question

2021-03-22 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
A counterpoise is what we do when the full size of a double-ended antenna, dipole, OCF, etc is too large for us to build, maintain, etc. Very simply, we want to jam the energy from the shield of our coax into the counterpoise, and the energy from the center conductor into the radiating element,

Re: Topband: New Subject: 160M array feedline question

2021-03-22 Thread Adrian
Recycling signals at the feedpoint sounds more like a mismatch swr situation. The ground radials form half of the antenna, and that radiation from ground, in phase with the vertical radiation determines the field strength and take off angle. vk4tux On 23/3/21 11:31 am, Charles Moizeau

Re: Topband: New Subject: 160M array feedline question

2021-03-22 Thread Charles Moizeau
I feel it more appropriate to say that the function of ground-mounted radials is to harvest the radiation from a vertical antenna that splashes on the ground and return it to the feed point for recycling. 72/73, Charles, W2SH From: Topband on behalf of Jim

Re: Topband: New Subject: 160M array feedline question

2021-03-22 Thread Jim Brown
On 3/22/2021 2:41 PM, Carl Braun wrote: Some brought up the idea of my ground mounted radials becoming submerged in fresh water...however, that would only take place for a week or less during the spring here and, it would only happen if we had a slow snow pack melt and rain at the same time.

Re: Topband: New Subject: 160M array feedline question

2021-03-22 Thread Carl Braun
Topbanders Thanks to all who responded I received a lot of good advice and will be taking it. Specifically, the advice to bury the hardline rather than elevate it. Some brought up the idea of my ground mounted radials becoming submerged in fresh water...however, that would only take place

Topband: Skip zone on different bands

2021-03-22 Thread Ignacy Misztal
Now for 2 weeks my QTH hears a static-like S9+ noise on 160m, 80, and to a less extent, 40m. No static heard on 30-10m. Makes 160/80m bands useless. Beverages and 4 sq point to the East. Seems the static is just within the ground wave of 40m but beyond that of 30m. Does anyone know the extent of

Re: Topband: New Subject: 160M array feedline question

2021-03-22 Thread Mpridesti via Topband
If the radials have a good chance be being submerged in fresh water, I would consider elevating the radials. Had an experience here where my 40 radials on each of my 4 square verticals were often times below the water level and radiation efficiency dropped like a rock. Great receive

Re: Topband: New Subject: 160M array feedline question

2021-03-22 Thread Wes
What's the perceived problem with the cable being submerged? Wes  N7WS On 3/21/2021 1:25 PM, Carl Braun wrote: Hello Topbanders I am currently awaiting the snow to melt here in the Northwoods of Wisconsin before starting the construction of my low band vertical array. My verticals will be

Topband: Good Conditions, Little Activity

2021-03-22 Thread Roger Kennedy
Yes, conditions seemed good on Saturday night . . . I didn't realise there was a Contest. I popped on for about an hour . . . didn't put out any CQ calls, as I didn't want loads of EU stations calling me. But I did work a few DX stations I heard, a few NA stations, Caribbean, plus the guy in