A 180 or 190 degree vertical radiator presents a few different
problems compared to one 90 degrees long, due to the high voltage at
the feedpoint. You can have ground loss there, but since it is more
of a coupling problem than a return current problem, the earth shield
is usually a copper mesh
it
to the feedpoint.
Charles, W2SH
From: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 7:40 PM
To: Charles Moizeau
Cc: Mike Waters; Roger Kennedy; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: 1/2 wave inv L
I've read that the minimum lengths for ground radials is no s
om>
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:31 PM
> To: Roger Kennedy
> Cc: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: 1/2 wave inv L
>
> Yup! The lack of a radial system explains why the 1/2w vertical worked
> better. :-)
>
> 73, Mike
> https://nam
f Mike Waters
<mikew...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:31 PM
To: Roger Kennedy
Cc: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: 1/2 wave inv L
Yup! The lack of a radial system explains why the 1/2w vertical worked
better. :-)
73, Mike
https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outl
Save yourself some wire, and either search back through the Topband
archives or model your very tall vertical. :-)
Basically, it'll waste a lot of RF at unwanted high angles.
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Feb 18, 2018 5:42 PM, "Charles Moizeau" wrote:
... Now, years later, with a
Years ago I tried a a weather balloon filled with hydrogen from a hired
canister. The balloon's spherical shape made it highly susceptible to being
disturbed by even a fairly mild breeze. In my case the vertical wire was
tilted well away from being vertical. Fairly soon the balloon met the
Yup! The lack of a radial system explains why the 1/2w vertical worked
better. :-)
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Feb 18, 2018 4:55 PM, "Roger Kennedy"
wrote:
Many years ago, a friend of mine used to operate on 160m with vertical
antennas suspended on a big Weather
If one is not talking about ham implementations of the commercial AM
BC paradigm and their big verticals over very well done dense radial
fields, the models can do quite poorly. Go ask W7EL. But then again,
what other tools do we have to go with.
It's a little dangerous extrapolating between 80
On 2/15/2015 2:35 PM, Art Snapper wrote:
I have been researching the inverted L for 160, and have received much
helpful information. - Thanks!
Today I stumbled across a document regarding the 1/2 wave inverted L.
Has anyone done a side-by-side comparison?
Art NK8X
_
I have