Yes, changing one's log after the fact to cover up a violation is scienter
or guilty knowledge, meaning fraud. DQ is the only appropriate action.
Lee, AA4GA
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021, 1:11 PM W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
> If you have violated the terms of your license that should be a DQ.
> Changing
If you have violated the terms of your license that should be a DQ.
Changing the frequency makes it even worse as it was an attempt to cover
up the action. If USA makes contacts out of band in CQ WW or ARRL DX
what happens to them? Are the QSO's simply removed and the op
admonished for the
My 2 cents
It makes sense to me to have the contest rules mirror the regulations
regarding frequency allocations.
No one is asking the contest sponsors to regulate anything.
Enforcing a frequency rule in a contest is no different than enforcing
any other contest rule. If the rules are
Full and final details on the recent spurious signal and how it was located can
be found on the following website.
http://sites.google.com/site/wgymsignal/
73's
Rick K2XT Don WD8DSB
___
Remember the PreStew coming on October 20th.
Very interesting and well done.
Was it ever discovered what was actually causing the spurious signal?
In other words, what did the station engineer do that caused the signal
to disappear?
Rudy is awesome too!
On 10/17/2012 7:00 PM, Don Kirk wrote:
Full and final details on the recent
It seems to be back. Or perhaps it's another one. On 1813 now.
73, Roger
--
Remember the Liberty (AGTR-5)
http://www.usslibertyveterans.org/
http://www.gtr5.com/
___
Remember the PreStew coming on October 20th. http://www.kkn.net/stew for more
I seem to remember that an AM BCB transmitter with a high efficiency modulator
can produce this type of crud when it's not working properly. My money is on a
BC
station in the NYC/Phila area.
73, Roger
On 10/3/2012 8:59 PM, ZR wrote:
Has anyone listened down around 452 KHz for a sick sounding
On 2012-10-03, at 8:04 AM, Rick Stealey wrote:
One thing I would suggest - standardize on receiver settings. I used CW, 400
Hz bandwidth on my K3,
no preamp of course.
Hi Guys,
Not to sound rude or demeaning, but do you know what I would suggest...?
STAY OFF OF 1810-KHz.
There's
It was loud by the ocean here in NJ, grid square FN20xj, at 1100UTC this
morning.
I'm going to dig out my Palomar Loop and see if I can DF the signal.
Mike N2MS
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 08:23 -0400, N1BUG wrote:
---snip--
There's never any DX way down in that part of the band anyway...
Au contraire! I have personally worked several JA stations between
1810 and 1811. If I had the patience to investigate my log I am
certain I would find European and
The only thing that is useful at this point is:
1.) location of someone with a signal that does not change very much day or
night
2.) direction with some absolute certainly within a reasonable range of
headings. This would require a known good small loop or multiple direction
antenna system
Currently @ 1430 UTC, location FN20ee Chester County, PA, the
offending signal on or about 1810.6 is fluctuating between S8 and
S9, occasionally dropping to S7. Radio is set to CW@500 hz.
Don't have any directional capabilities - antenna is a 160 meter
OCF windom at 50 ft. broadside basically
If someone here could take a map and plot all of the the data points, thearea
from which the signal originates will become clear.
I did that this morning using Google Earth, and while the data is noisy (some
stray data points), so far it appears the signal is originating from the half
of New
I have it at about 210 on a loop, measured last night after work
(~2300z).
Mike N1TA
Original Message
Subject: Re: Topband: 1810 kHz signal
From: Don Kirk wd8...@aol.com
Date: Wed, October 03, 2012 10:38 am
To: telegraph...@gmail.com, topband@contesting.com
If someone here
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Don Kirk wd8...@aol.com wrote:
I did that this morning using Google Earth, and while the data is noisy
(some stray data points), so far it appears the signal is originating
from the
half of New Jersey State that's south of New York State (somewhere
between
New
On 2012-10-03, at 8:35 AM, James Rodenkirch wrote:
Oh, so now it's all about DX and not about the little guy?
Did you forget that 1810 is listed as the QRP frequency?
I've heard Jon, AA1K, down around there calling CQ DX several times in the
morningand I recall making lots of Qs
This is why we don't want to ignore this stuff.
__
I'm coming to the realization after spending the better part of the last 24
hours working on my Beverages
that we can't get meaningful data this way.
Tom - do you think portable loops, say 2 ft on a side, would provide enough
signal
Has anyone listened down around 452 KHz for a sick sounding NDB and up thru
the BC band for its harmonics or something else?
Carl
KM1H
- Original Message -
From: Tom W8JI w...@w8ji.com
To: Topband@contesting.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 5:56 PM
Subject: Topband: 1810-1813
18 matches
Mail list logo
