Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?

2013-01-21 Thread Tom W8JI
Could that not be said of any inline protection then? Almost, anything but a disconnect. Also, while we sometimes go wild with grounds, nearly ALL of the protection (or lack of protection) comes from how things are bonded and common grounded going into the protected area. I can't stress

Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?

2013-01-20 Thread cx7tt
On Sun Jan 20 01:58:14 2013, Cecil wrote: The polyphasers are good protectors but be aware that they rely on gas tubes for protection and their failure mode is one that leaves you unknowingly unprotected. After so many ionizations the gas tube will fail and won't clamp on the next strike.

Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?

2013-01-20 Thread Jim Brown
On 1/20/2013 1:40 AM, cx...@4email.net wrote: I started replacing all items along the path and discovered the PP on the grounded copper board at the base of the tower had gone 'south'... Several points here. First, there is no value to lightning suppression at the base of a tower unless that

Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?

2013-01-20 Thread Tom W8JI
The polyphasers are good protectors but be aware that they rely on gas tubes for protection and their failure mode is one that leaves you unknowingly unprotected. After so many ionizations the gas tube will fail and won't clamp on the next strike. For a time Polyphaser made a test set to

Re: Topband: Polyphaser IS-50UX-CO vs ICE Model 303?

2013-01-19 Thread HAROLD SMITH JR
Hello Tom,   I have Polyphaser and I.C.E. units on all my cables ( Antenna and all Control ). I installed them in 1991 after several strikes damaged my Tranceivers. Since then, I have had no problems. The most important is a good Grounding System. A couple of ground rods won't do the trick.