When I get home tomorrow, I will sweep a few of cable splitters and see
what they look like. I have used them or spitting receivers in HF and VHF
many times.
Mike va3mw
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 9:23 AM Peter Bertini
wrote:
> I'd avoid the TV splitters, quality is all over the place and the
I'd avoid the TV splitters, quality is all over the place and the lower
frequency limit varies. You would really want to measure the loss at 1.8
MHz before committing to use one.
I've been playing around with satellite TV splitters (most specifically
DirecTV splitters (
Ok Stan that's a great tip.I have several at home and will
investigate. Am in ve3 land for Xmas returning dec 28.
73 Frank vo1hp
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018, 07:00 Stan Stockton Frank,
>
> If too much trouble to make a proper splitter, a $2.00 TV splitter will
> work fine. The specs say they
Frank,
If too much trouble to make a proper splitter, a $2.00 TV splitter will work
fine. The specs say they are good for 5-1000 MHz. but I've used them in years
past on 160m and seriously doubt that, without test equipment that most people
don't even have available, you would ever know the
Corrected the autotransformer turns/tap on the 2-way splitter examples...
http://no3m.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/splitters.png
On 12/24/18 1:57 PM, Eric NO3M wrote:
Frank
If you really want a 3-port splitter, see here:
http://no3m.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/splitter-3.png
Two more
Frank
If you really want a 3-port splitter, see here:
http://no3m.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/splitter-3.png
Two more common alternatives using 2-port splitters:
http://no3m.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/splitters.png
73 Eric NO3M
On 12/24/18 8:00 AM, Frank VO1HP wrote:
Does anyone
Hi Frank,
I don't know anything about 3-way splitters, but if I were in your
situation I think I would sacrifice 1 dB and make a 4-way splitter using
3x 2-way splitters. 2-way is much more commonly used and documented, and
quite probably easier to achieve than 3-way. The 4th port is simply
