Re: Topband: antenna analyzers

2018-10-15 Thread Wes Stewart
I can now verify that the FA-VA5 does just fine on my 160 meter inverted-L. As an aside, we've had some rain here in Tucson lately and I've observed a decrease in the feedpoint Z of about 5 ohm due to increased ground conductivity.  Welcome, but I know it's temporary. Wes  N7WS On

Re: Topband: antenna analyzers

2018-10-12 Thread Jeff Blaine
At this location, the VNWA is a bit squirly near the BC band but with a single L/C notch added at the device input (within the cal plane), it works fine. The AA-55 Zoom I have is immune and is the my go-to instrument for field work.  Recommended. MFJ-259 is too easily disturbed and is not

Re: Topband: antenna analyzers

2018-10-12 Thread Wes Stewart
I can vouch for the AA-55 Zoom, although it is not without flaws. I live 5.9 miles from a 50KW BC station on 1550 kHz.  On my 160-meter inverted-L they are 70 dB over S9 on a calibrated K3, that's 70 dB above -73 dBm or -3dBm. As long as I don't sweep through that frequency, the analyzer is

Re: Topband: antenna analyzers

2018-10-12 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist
On 10/12/2018 12:02 PM, AC0RL via Topband wrote: I have found that antenna analyzers can get screwed up on long antennas if there are nearby transmitters; AM stations or any other transmitter that can swamp out the input to the analyzer. I live 1/4 mile from a 1kw am station and I cannot use