Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-04-02 Thread Steve Ireland
Hi Jim The omission of the words ‘inverted vee’ in front of ‘dipole’ for Tom W8JI’s antenna up 300 feet high was a slip of the keyboard at my end! I used to work Tom regularly back when he had the antenna up and helped him with comparative signal reports. When he was doing signal

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-04-01 Thread Jim Thomson
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2018 00:23:15 -0400 (EDT) From: donov...@starpower.net To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles www.arrl.org/news/storm-takes-down-amateur-radio-contest-club-towers-in-northern-europe ## Per the OH8X current website, they still

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-03-31 Thread donovanf
gt; >> >> Bill K4XS/KH7XS >> >> >> >> -Original Message----- >> From: Greg - ZL3IX <zl...@inet.net.nz> >> To: topband <topband@contesting.com> >> Sent: Fri, Mar 30, 2018 7:34 pm >> Subject: Re: Topband: 160m polarizat

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-03-31 Thread Merv Schweigert via Topband
Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles Hi Carl, OH8X was active for some months when I was making Qs with Eu, in particular OH. I never heard them at all, although I have no idea of exactly when they were QRV. My guess is that if their monster antenna had produced results, they wou

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-03-31 Thread Pete
ly much better. > > > Bill K4XS/KH7XS > > > > -Original Message- > From: Greg - ZL3IX <zl...@inet.net.nz> > To: topband <topband@contesting.com> > Sent: Fri, Mar 30, 2018 7:34 pm > Subject: Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles > > Hi Ca

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-03-31 Thread Lee STRAHAN
, 2018 10:15 AM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 23:15:00 +0800 From: "Steve Ireland" <vk...@arach.net.au> To: <topband@contesting.com> Subject: Re: Topband: 160m polarisation and e

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-03-31 Thread Jim Thomson
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 23:15:00 +0800 From: "Steve Ireland" To: Subject: Re: Topband: 160m polarisation and elevation angles http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-03-30 Thread GEORGE WALLNER
Greg, In concert with HA7RY (Tomi), one night I was monitoring OH8X while the monster Yagi was still up. At Tomi's QTH (in Hungary) it was very loud. I could barely copy it in FL. I worked EU stations that were much stronger. I think the antenna was too low and there was too much high-angle

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-03-30 Thread cqtestk4xs--- via Topband
-Original Message- From: Greg - ZL3IX <zl...@inet.net.nz> To: topband <topband@contesting.com> Sent: Fri, Mar 30, 2018 7:34 pm Subject: Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles Hi Carl, OH8X was active for some months when I was making Qs with Eu, in particular

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-03-30 Thread Greg - ZL3IX
Hi Carl, OH8X was active for some months when I was making Qs with Eu, in particular OH. I never heard them at all, although I have no idea of exactly when they were QRV. My guess is that if their monster antenna had produced results, they would have been a lot more active. We can certainly

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-03-30 Thread donovanf
VK3HJ" <vk3hj_l...@barefoothorse.com.au> To: "topBand List" <topband@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 5:04:13 AM Subject: Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles -Original Message- From: donov...@starpower.net "160 meter l

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-03-29 Thread VK3HJ
-Original Message- From: donov...@starpower.net "160 meter long distance propagation is much more efficient to the south " Do you mean "between higher latitudes and lower latitudes"? To my south there are only penguins, and Tasmanians. Luke VK3HJ _ Topband

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-03-29 Thread donovanf
Message - From: "Mark K3MSB" <mark.k3...@gmail.com> To: "Carl Luetzelschwab" <carlluetzelsch...@gmail.com> Cc: "topBand List" <topband@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 10:20:11 PM Subject: Re: Topband: 160m polarization and eleva

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-03-29 Thread Carl Luetzelschwab
Mark, > I learned that polarization is not predictable after the first ionospheric bounce. Theoretically, polarization is well-defined as an electromagnetic wave progresses thru the ionosphere. What's important is the "limiting" polarization at the entry and exit points of the ionosphere, and

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-03-29 Thread Mark K3MSB
Carl I learned that polarization is not predictable after the first ionospheric bounce. 73 Mark K3MSB On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Carl Luetzelschwab < carlluetzelsch...@gmail.com> wrote: > Polarization - As Jerry K4SAV stated, the electron gyro-frequency plays an > important role on 160m

Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

2018-03-29 Thread Carl Luetzelschwab
Polarization - As Jerry K4SAV stated, the electron gyro-frequency plays an important role on 160m since our ionosphere is immersed in a magnetic field - it also affects ionospheric absorption and refraction. For those of us at mid to high latitudes, vertical polarization on 160m is *theoretically*