Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-15 Thread MICHAEL ST ANGELO
Mark, I hear you. As an engineer I basically worked a sedentary office job during the day and operated at night. When I retired I figured I would have more time but I make it a point of being active. My wife and I take a hike very day. When out of the house I try to operate portable therefore

Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-15 Thread Mark Lunday
I agree with you, Mike. It would be interesting to survey the average age of our top-band subscribers (Tree, was this done already and I missed it?) I started on top band in 2007, and really started chasing DX in 2009-2010 season (it was a good one!) But that was 10 years ago. Between

Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-15 Thread Mike Waters
Interesting. After reading that Spaceweather article, I had my radiation detector app running on my tablet two days ago, and there was no doubt that it was picking up significantly more counts per minute than I've ever seen! However, the background count last night had dropped to almost normal,

Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-15 Thread MICHAEL ST ANGELO
I attribute the decline in participation to the raising noise floor and the aging population of ham radio operators. I been operating 160 since I moved to the present location form a city lot in 1998 and have noticed the noise level constantly raising. I've been successful in noise sources in

Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-15 Thread Carl Luetzelschwab
Hi to everyone, >From ionization rates in the scientific literature, galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) result in more electrons down low in the ionosphere (from collisional ionization) - where ionospheric absorption occurs. So one would think that the more cosmic rays, the more absorption - which is

Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-15 Thread Chortek, Robert L.
On Dec 15, 2019, at 3:32 AM, Bill Tippett wrote: > > ”... the great conditions of 2009 were > actually SLIGHTLY AFTER the cycle 24 minimum in December 2008. If the new > minimum is as forecast in April 2020, it could be that the best conditions > will be slightly past that minimum (i.e. during

Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-15 Thread Bill Tippett
e beverages) > > hope that it gets better soon. it has been a very bad winter. > > larry > n7dd > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Tippett > To: Nicholas Hall-Patch > CC: topband > Sent: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 3:28 > Subject: Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

Topband: cosmic ray update

2019-12-14 Thread Larry via Topband
well that came out unreadable! try again. scores over the past years:  2009   618,000,   2010    752,000(83 countries),    2011   600,000,   2012   324,000,  2013   367,000. 2014   312,000,    2015   319,000,    2016   278,000,   2017   372,000,   2018     384,000. 2009-2011 were very good years

Topband: cosmic ray update

2019-12-14 Thread Larry via Topband
for what it's worth here are my scores from past years:2007   247,0002009    618,0002010   752,000   (83 countries)2011   600,0002012   324,0002013    367,0002014   312,0002015   319,0002016   278,0002017   372,0002018   384,000 certainly scores were dependent on conditions that weekend but no

Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-14 Thread Bill Tippett
Could be that good conditions are just ahead but they better hurry up. The 6 years of >100k scores in the last cycle versus none so far in this one seems to indicate something is very different about this cycle compared to the last one. If this cycle is 11 years, we should have seen much better

Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-14 Thread Nicholas Hall-Patch
But doesn't the graph referenced in your link https://spaceweather.com/repeat_images/crinfo2.png indicate that the greatest strength from cosmic rays was 2009-2010, when trans polar conditions were at their best, Bill? I'd defer to K9LA's comments in a heartbeat, but isn't the one (the primary?)

Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-14 Thread Bill Tippett
Not bad but definitely not great either. Nobody (USA SOHP/160) has broken 100k so far in CQWWCW for this cycle low. There were 6 consecutive years over 100k (2005-2010) for the previous cycle low. K9LA may comment but I understand cosmic rays cause increased absorption just as high solar

Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-14 Thread Michael Tope
During the last minimum, there were times when high northern latitude stations in zone 17 and 18 would be very strong for long periods of time here in southern California. Last Sunday morning during the ARRL 160 contest there was an opening that had that very low absorption characteristic

Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-14 Thread Chortek, Robert L.
Please don’t laugh at my puny numbers. This season I have worked 5 European stations from my noise challenged postage stamp lot in San Jose. The last time I was able to hear and work a European station at my QTH was 2009. I’ve worked more DXCC entities on 160 this year than I have in any

Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-14 Thread K9FD
This morning conditions were close to, not quite as good as 2008 era. A5 was a good signal drawing a big crowd,  4S7 good signal even after sunrise, lot of Asian Russians,  EU Russians,  EU from north to G, F, SV, etc copyable, EA8ZT called me with 599 plus signals just after my sunrise,  lot

Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-14 Thread Tree
This morning - I put 21 Europeans in the log. Guess conditions are not that bad. Tree N6TR On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 10:24 AM Bill Tippett wrote: > This could account for relatively poor conditions on 160 despite the low SF > and K indices: > > *COSMIC RAY UPDATE:* Something ironic is

Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE

2019-12-14 Thread Bill Tippett
This could account for relatively poor conditions on 160 despite the low SF and K indices: *COSMIC RAY UPDATE:* Something ironic is happening in Earth’s atmosphere. Solar activity is low–very low. Yet atmospheric radiation is heading in the opposite direction. Cosmic rays percolating through the