Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-06 Thread Jim Brown
On Fri,12/5/2014 12:29 PM, Charles Yahrling wrote: Just getting started modelling and looking for answers to questions not found in manual so far. For example, what exactly is included in the Return Loss figure shown in the SWR window? Just ground reflection loss, total system loss, something

Topband: EZNEC 5.0 + return loss and another question

2014-12-06 Thread Charles Yahrling
Thanks for your explanations Charlie es Tom. I guess return loss is the opposite of what it sounded like to me. At any rate, you've explained why it varies inversely with SWR. Next question: in the manual the ALT IMPEDANCE explantion uses a 4:1 transformer example, which I get. I've been

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-06 Thread Tom W8JI
We can have 67% reflected power and still have nearly 100% of transmitter power getting into the antenna and being radiated. Then could someone please explain why the manufacturers of ham, broadcast AM/FM/TV, and other transmitters specify the maximum SWR (e.g., minimum return loss) for

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 + return loss and another question

2014-12-06 Thread Tom W8JI
Chuck, Next question: in the manual the ALT IMPEDANCE explantion uses a 4:1 transformer example, which I get. I've been toggling between RG213 50 ohm and rg6/u 75 ohm to observe differences, reasoning that if I use a 75 ohm feeder and get 2:0:1 or lower SWR values, the 50 ohm system would

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-06 Thread Paul Christensen
Not sure that I can picture just what you are describing, Paul. Even though, I wasn't born until 1944, I've explored just about every type of antenna and I've modeled an awful lot of them. See the image in the link below: After rotating the image in your browser, note that the feed to the

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-06 Thread Charlie Cunningham
Thanks, Carl I suppose all those wires helped to increase bandwidth. Charlie K4OTV -Original Message- From: Carl [mailto:k...@jeremy.qozzy.com] Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2014 10:20 AM To: Charlie Cunningham; 'Paul Christensen'; 'topband' Subject: Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 + Charlie

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-06 Thread k8bhz
-Original Message- From: Charlie Cunningham Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2014 9:49 PM To: 'Paul Christensen' ; topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 + Thanks for all the info and the memories, Paul!! 73, Charlie, K4OTV -Original Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun

Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Charles Yahrling
Just getting started modelling and looking for answers to questions not found in manual so far. For example, what exactly is included in the Return Loss figure shown in the SWR window? Just ground reflection loss, total system loss, something else? Trying to understand why Return Loss is

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Mike Waters
Chuck, SWR and return loss are related. Check these out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_loss http://www.minicircuits.com/app/DG03-111.pdf What are you modeling? 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Charles Yahrling cfytech2...@gmail.com wrote: Just getting started

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Tom W8JI
...@gmail.com To: topband@contesting.com Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 3:29 PM Subject: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 + Just getting started modelling and looking for answers to questions not found in manual so far. For example, what exactly is included in the Return Loss figure shown in the SWR window? Just

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Charlie Cunningham
] On Behalf Of Charles Yahrling Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 3:29 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 + Just getting started modelling and looking for answers to questions not found in manual so far. For example, what exactly is included in the Return Loss figure shown

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Richard Fry
We can have 67% reflected power and still have nearly 100% of transmitter power getting into the antenna and being radiated. Then could someone please explain why the manufacturers of ham, broadcast AM/FM/TV, and other transmitters specify the maximum SWR (e.g., minimum return loss) for the

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Charlie Cunningham
W8JI Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 4:40 PM To: Charles Yahrling; topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 + Return loss is just another misleading confusing way to express SWR. Return loss, like percentage reflected power, does not indicate any type of loss. It just expresses SWR

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Paul Christensen
@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 + We can have 67% reflected power and still have nearly 100% of transmitter power getting into the antenna and being radiated. Then could someone please explain why the manufacturers of ham, broadcast AM/FM/TV, and other transmitters specify the maximum

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Lloyd Berg - N9LB
: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Charlie Cunningham Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 6:30 PM To: 'Tom W8JI'; 'Charles Yahrling'; topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 + Well, I would respectfully disagree with Tom, that Return Loss is confusing

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Richard Fry
Hello Paul, RE: Typically a transmitter will fold-back delivered power when its output Z is fixed (e.g., 50 or 70-ohm) and SWR exceeds some predetermined amount set by the manufacturer. This is typical of broadbanded solid-state amplifiers with a fixed output Z that use no output matching

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Paul Christensen
What did they call the teens to 20's antenna that had multiple feeds coming down from one end of the flatop to the other? Both the T and the fanned inverted L were popular on 200m in 1910-1920 just as the single-wire Inverted L is today on 160m. Back then, ops were obsessed with maximum

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Charlie Cunningham
that you are describing, because I can't quite picture it. 73, Charlie, K4OTV -Original Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Paul Christensen Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 11:23 PM To: topband Subject: Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 + What did they call