GM Herb,
The DXCC Card Checkers do not have to have 160m DXCC
anymorebut they do have to allow their work to be
vetted by HQ. Some field checkers may be unaware of this change; I have
personally run into this problem. I do know that Don Search, W3AZD, checks
160m cards
Hi Topbanders
Guy K2AV - Lots of philosophy ...
ARRL has a program:
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20190624-A4.pdf#page=1=auto,-12,848
ARRL is obliged to protect this program!
But ARRL does not do this ...
This rating has lost its value today.
Unfortunately...
---
Nick,
I concur. I wonder if someone could adopt their logs post operation and
provide LOTW as a surrogate? Also, the stations who require green stamps
could learn the OQRS procedure and probably net more income and quicker to
support their operation.
Herb, KV4FZ
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 8:30 AM Tim
Would not a 100% LOTW be the ultimate answer to card frauds? There is, in
fact, is no card checker in the VI for 160 meter QSO's causing me countless
mailings to the DXCC desk. This all could be avoided in the future if the
ARRL went to 100% LOTW. Most rare DX stations would want their
It does seem, at the moment not being entirely wrapped up in ham
radio, that there certainly is the analogue of OK1YQ in just about
every realm of life. I can think of a few names that I personally
found intensely irritating in the particular circumstances. So I DO
understand the pique. When will
Several months ago I was asked by the League for a segment of one of
my DX-pedition logs. I assume it was for this, but I don't know that
for a fact.
Times are changing. There are more ways than ever for someone who
wants to game the game. Fake cards seem rather old fashion.
73
Ken K4ZW
Il 22/06/2019 19:34, Wayne n7ng wrote:
That fact is that there isn't much [Topband] expertise left in
Newington. I asked a casual question a month or so ago about OK1RD,
etc., and was assured that an investigation was conducted.
I asked yesterday K5UR at Ham Fair in Friedrichshafen. Rick
Time to take action on this one please
Thanks to all who find the time to do so.
73 JEFF
From: k...@aol.com
To: n...@n4is.com
Sent: 11/17/2018 3:56:25 PM Coordinated Universal Time
Subject: Re: Topband: Fwd: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters OK1YQ (OK1RD) Legitimacy???!!!
JC and other 160m ops
PLEASE
t.michaels...@telia.com writes:
Good idea Jeff! Thanks Peter for digging in this mudd!
73
Len/BIC
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Topband För k1zm--- via Topband
Skickat: den 17 november 2018 11:43
Till: topband@contesting.com
Ämne: Topband: Fwd: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters OK1YQ (OK1RD)
writes:
Good idea Jeff! Thanks Peter for digging in this mudd!
73
Len/BIC
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Topband För k1zm--- via Topband
Skickat: den 17 november 2018 11:43
Till: topband@contesting.com
Ämne: Topband: Fwd: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters OK1YQ (OK1RD) Legitimacy???!!!
From: k
From: k...@aol.com
To: sm2...@telia.com
Cc: d...@arrl.org
Sent: 11/17/2018 10:33:41 AM Coordinated Universal Time
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters OK1YQ (OK1RD) Legitimacy???!!!
Hmmm again
Okay - now I remember this guy and his shenanigans from way back. OK1RD (now
masquerading
11 matches
Mail list logo
