Topband: On FT8, noise bandwidths, filters, and signal vs noise.

2018-12-20 Thread DXer
Tim, I'm a QLF CW operator. Yes, that bad. :^) What you described below is exactly what I go through during a contest. Unless I switch back and forth between narrow and wide, I cannot listen for very long on narrow. For the wider Topband audience: Set the BW to 3 kHz, this is how wide the

Re: Topband: On FT8, noise bandwidths, filters, and signal vs noise.

2018-12-20 Thread JC
Hi Tim You wrote < In VHF/UHF and EME weak-signal CW work, a lot of operators also liked listening with wider RX filters too, often preferring Gaussian filter shapes, and letting their ear pull the signal out of the noise.> I may be just normal because my experience on EME CW is very different.

Re: Topband: On FT8, noise bandwidths, filters, and signal vs noise.

2018-12-20 Thread Gary Smith
Speaking to the narrowness of filters for CW; I recently had an issue with my K3s which has the dual Rx and a full compliment of filters with 200Hz the most narrow in the main & Sub Rx receivers. I sent it for repair and used my backup K3 which has been upgraded to essentially a K3s with

Topband: On FT8, noise bandwidths, filters, and signal vs noise.

2018-12-20 Thread Tim Shoppa
I broadly enjoy the digital modes, especially RTTY, and have been using some FT8 outside of contests. A signal power that FT8 reports as being at -15dB, is easily heard and copied by ear by any decent CW operator. I think a really good CW operator could pull (maybe with a few repeats) callsigns